Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 09:04:15 -0800
Subject: TIME MAGAZINE – Ecstasy- Have YOU Written a Letter this Week?
***************************************************************************
DrugSense FOCUS Alert # 164 Sunday March 12, 2000
Time Magazine Exposes The Futility Of Ecstasy Ban
***************************************************************************
PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE
NOTE: Time Magazine has a circulation of more than 4 MILLION READERS. A 5
inch letter published in this magazine is equivalent to buying an ad on
behalf of drug policy reform worth MORE THAN $12,000!!
***************************************************************************
DrugSense FOCUS Alert # 164 Sunday March 12, 2000
In a recent article, Time Magazine exposes that the US has encountered a
striking upsurge in popularity of the rave drug ecstasy, despite its
15-year old worldwide ban instigated by the DEA in 1985. This provides yet
another case study for the utter futility of the efforts to contain
recreational drug use with prohibitionist measures.
Please use this opportunity to point out to the editors and readers of Time
Magazine the necessity to find less harmful approaches to addressing the
drug problem.
Here are some arguments that may serve as departure points for your letter
to the editors:
(1) Even though ecstasy was banned in the US in 1985 and in the consecutive
year, under US influence, in most European countries, this did not curb the
growth of the drug’s popularity which peaked in Europe in the 1990s and
now, with a delay of about ten years, in North America. This shows that
drug usage patterns are largely independent of interdiction and law
enforcement.
(2) The article mentions that the drug marketing efforts of racketeers have
helped popularize the drug. This suggests that criminalization is not just
fruitless but actually counterproductive. There are many more indications
for the ill effects of drug prohibition. For example, emergency room
admissions associated with intoxications from GHB, a club drug also
mentioned in the article, were never reported before the FDA banned its
sale in 1991 but have skyrocketed since then.
(3) The article mentions that the purity and potency of ecstasy pills vary
widely and that the drug is often mixed with other ingredients. The
potential harm to the drug user who cannot judge what is inside the pill
is, again, the result of criminalization.
(4) Ecstasy is almost as cheap and exactly as easy to produce as meth (the
process is the same, only the precursor chemicals are harder to come by).
If setting up a drug lab costs nearly nothing and every kitchen chemist can
synthesize the drug, ever so many lab busts will not put a lid on the
supply side. To cut the demand, on the other hand, police would have to
purge every campus in the US of ravers, which is as scary and ludicrous as
it is impossible.
(5) The article mentions the scientific dispute about possible brain damage
due to MDMA use and says that the ban issued by the DEA resulted from the
initial findings. In fact, in 1985, the year of the ban, appeared the first
report about the destruction of brain nerve terminals in rats exposed to
ecstasy. In comparison, some anti-obesity drugs, such as Meridia and Redux,
have been known from the early 1990s to effect similar kinds of brain cell
alterations, but this never resulted in the revocation of these drugs
(Redux was pulled from the market in 1997 only after reports of heart valve
damage). Similarly, antidepressants such as Prozac and Zoloft are known to
alter the function of the very same brain nerve terminals that are
allegedly damaged by MDMA. A recent study by Jefferson Medical College in
Philadelphia found that the changes effected by these antidepressants are
similar to those observed with MDMA. How can the eagerness to ban MDMA be
justified in comparison with the lack of concern with regard to
prescription drugs?
Thanks for your effort and support.
WRITE A LETTER TODAY
It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do
***************************************************************************
PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID
( Letter, Phone, fax etc.)
Please post a copy your letter or report your action to the sent letter
list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by E-mailing a copy
directly to [email protected] Your letter will then be forwarded to the
list with so others can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow
suit
This is VERY IMPORTANT as it is the only way we have of gauging our impact
and effectiveness.
**************************************************************************
CONTACT INFO
Source: Time Magazine (US)
Contact: [email protected]
Note: Always include your address and telephone number.
***************************************************************************
ARTICLE
US: It’s All The Rave
Newshawk: Tom O’Connell
Pubdate: Mon, 13 Mar 2000
Source: Time Magazine (US)
Copyright: 2000 Time Inc.
Contact: [email protected]
Address: Time Magazine Letters, Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, NY,
NY 10020
Fax: (212) 522-8949
Website: http://www.time.com/
Author: John Cloud
Bookmarks: For ecstasy items http://www.mapinc.org/mdma.htm
For: rave items http://www.mapinc.org/raves.htm
IT’S ALL THE RAVE
SUDDENLY PEOPLE ALL OVER THE country are talking about “ecstasy” as if it
were something other than what an eight-year-old feels at Disney
World. Occasionally the trickle from the fringe to the heartland turns
into a slipstream, and that seems to have happened with the heart-pulsing,
mildly psychedelic drug called ecstasy.
To get a sense of just how far and fast “e” has moved into American
communities in the past year or so, talk to Mark Bradford, a junior at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
“I came to college in the fall of ’97,” says Bradford, 21, “and I didn’t
even know the word had another meaning.” It’s not shocking that young Mark
moved from suburban St. Louis to find drugs on a big campus. But it’s a
little surprising where he encountered ecstasy, a drug first used in the
1970s by a small group of avant-garde psychotherapists — at frat houses.
As president of the university’s Interfraternity Council, Bradford has
found himself in meetings with police to discuss frat boys’ growing
appetite for a drug today usually associated with teen ravers, gay men and
what’s left of America’s aging hippies, “It’s everywhere now,” says
Bradford, who doesn’t touch the stuff.
Law enforcers are coming across gigantic stashes of ecstasy in places where
it was rarely seen. E comes as tablets or capsules, and since December,
Ohio authorities have seized 25,000 pills in Columbus and 200 more in rural
Lorain County. In January some 30 people were arrested in New Orleans for
distributing the drug. Two weeks ago in Providence, R.I., a seven-month
investigation into ecstasy dealing ended with the arrest of 23. In bigger
cities, the trade has exploded. In December the U.S. Customs Service
discovered 100 lbs. of ecstasy shipped from France to the FedEx
headquarters in Memphis. The agents followed the drug’s intended trail to
L.A. and found a staggering 1.2 million tablets, worth $30 million.
And in an elaborate sting last summer, customs agents and the Drug
Enforcement Administration helped dismantle a far-flung ecstasy empire run
by a Canadian based in Amsterdam who allegedly claimed he could sell
100,000 hits of ecstasy in Miami – in 48 hours.
The mastermind was using pious looking Hasidic Jews as couriers. (Israeli
organized crime dominates the global trade, according to the
U.S. government.)
The busts have had little effect.
Nationwide, customs officers have already seized more ecstasy this fiscal
year (nearly 3.3 million hits) than in all of last year; in 1997, they
seized just 400,000 hits. In a 1998 survey, 8% of high school seniors said
they had tried e, up from 5.8% the year before.
In New York City, according to another survey, 1 in 4 adolescents has tried
ecstasy. So much e is coming into the U.S. that the Customs Service has
created a special ecstasy command center and is training 13 more dogs to
sniff out the drug.
But it took a seizure in Phoenix two weeks ago to generate e’s first big
press coverage in years.
That bust snared Salvatore Gravano, the notorious Mob hit man turned
government snitch.
Like the Hasidim, Gravano is a rather curious newcomer to the ecstasy
culture.
You wouldn’t think someone nicknamed “Sammy the Bull” would be peddling the
so-called hug drug. But simple reasons lie behind the drug’s popularity
among sellers and users.
E is cheap to make, easy to distribute and consume–no dirty syringes or
passe coke spoons needed, thanks–and it has a reputation for being
fun. E’s euphoria may be chemically manufactured, but it feels no less
real to users.
It’s called the hug drug because it engenders gooey, rather gauche
expressions of empathy from users.
Last week students at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff reminisced
about melting into “cuddle puddles,” groups of students who massage and
embrace on the dance floor. The skin feels tremblingly alive when
caressed. “Feathers, toys, lotions, anything,” gurgles “Katrina,” 23, a
student at N.A.U. “A guy touching your skin with a cold drink. It’s
delicious.”
Though often cut with other drugs, ecstasy pills are at least intended to
be a substance called MDMA (and known only to chemists as
methylenedioxymethamphetamine). MDMA is pharmacologically related to
amphetamine and mescaline, but it doesn’t produce the nervy, wired feeling
that typically accompanies speed or the confusion of a purer psychedelic
like LSD. It doesn’t generate addictive cravings. Treatment admissions
for drugs of its type still account for less than 1% of the total,
according to Dr. Blanche Frank of the New York State office of alcohol and
substance abuse.
In fact, e’s popularity is largely due to its lack of noticeable downsides.
It’s possible to overdose on ecstasy, but even police agree that the drug
isn’t like heroin or crack in terms of short-term dangers.
Most problems are attributable to dehydration among novices who don’t drink
water.
However, another club drug, GHB – which is also known as “Liquid X” though
it’s chemically unrelated to ecstasy – can easily cause coma and death.
MDMA was first synthesized in 1912, but the big experiments with it didn’t
begin until the 1970s, when a group of psychologists rediscovered it as a
tool for therapy.
By the early ’80s, the drug – still perfectly legal – was sold openly in
bars and clubs.
But at the time a scientific debate had begun – and continues today about
whether MDMA can cause long-term brain damage.
In 1985, on the basis of preliminary data about its harmfulness, the DEA
used its discretionary power to outlaw MDMA. A group of therapists sued,
but after a three-year court battle, the DEA won the right to ban the drug
permanently.
So why is it upon us again?
Partly because the debate about MDMA’s harmfulness has never been resolved.
Johns Hopkins neurologist George Ricaurte has concluded in several animal
studies and one human study that MDMA can damage a particular group of the
brain’s nerve cells. But he wants more research.
Last week Ricaurte said his work has never shown that the damage to the
affected cells has any visible effect on “the vast majority of people who
have experimented with MDMA.” The debate has now found its way onto the
Web, where the old therapist crowd behind MDMA has become active.
The sites are populated mostly by young users, however, kids who blindly
praise the drug (“Sammy the Bull rules,” wrote one last week).
But the most important reason for e’s quick and recent spread into places
like Denver and Sacramento is that professional criminals have almost
completely assumed control of its trade.
The life of a typical tablet found in the U.S. begins somewhere along the
Dutch-Belgian border, a quiet region of pig farmers.
The setting is rural but not far from the Brussels airport.
Manufacturers convert abandoned barns or garden sheds into e factories,
which can be filthy. “They’ve been mixing chemicals in dirty cans I
wouldn’t even use for garbage,” says Charles De Winter, director of the
drug section of Belgium’s national police force.
These mills aren’t mom-and-pop setups, at least not anymore.
“We’re seeing more and more hardened criminals,” says Cees van Doorn, a
Dutch organized-crime specialist. They are drawn by the profits. After
setup the marginal cost of each pill is maybe 10 cents . It’s sold in New
York City clubs for $30,
U.S. Customs commissioner Raymond Kelly says professional criminals in
this country have brought better management and marketing to the ecstasy
trade.
Mobsters have the distribution networks to move millions of pills.
And most pills now come with a catchy brand name-like the “Candy Canes”
taken in Flagstaff (red and white capsules) or tablets stamped with
corporate logos.
Users can ask dealers for a good brand by name. Last year’s “Mitsubishis,”
for instance, were hugely popular because they seemed to have an extra kick
of speed.
This winter’s “AOLS,” however, were duds.
What is the future of ecstasy?
Officials in the Low Countries are cracking down on e factories but warn
that production is cropping up in central Europe and Spain. For good
reason: Americans are in love with ecstasy. “New York used to be a meat
and-potatoes drug town – heroin, coke and pot,” says John Silbering, a
former narcotics prosecutor who works for the Tunnel, a big New York City
nightclub. “Today we no longer find coke or heroin among the young. It’s
always ecstasy.”
******************************************************************************
SAMPLE LETTER (sent)
To the Editors of Time Magazine:
In “It’s all the Rave” (March 13 issue) John Cloud addressed the recent
upsurge of MDMA (ecstasy) use in the US.
Ecstasy was banned in the North America and in Europe in the mid-80s, just
at around the time that the rave movement started in Britain. The
rave/ecstasy rage then spilled over to continental Europe where it had its
heyday in the early 1990s. That the US and Canada now experience the same
mania with ten years delay, calls into question the effectiveness of
criminalizing ecstasy, as the phenomenon spread regardless and
independently of the almost simultaneous worldwide ban of the drug.
The article notes that criminal organizations attracted by the illicit drug
trade have assumed control of the distribution and marketing of ecstasy. As
a consequence and to no surprise, teenagers nowadays can generally obtain
ecstasy and other illegal drugs easier than alcohol. This means that
criminalization is not only vain but rather achieves the exact opposite of
protecting young people from the exposure to drugs.
When alcohol prohibition ended in 1933, this did not create a nation of
deranged alcoholics, but it helped to tear down crime syndicates and to
establish effective controls such as age limits on alcohol sales. It is in
society’s interest that young people get not exposed to drugs of
uncontrolled origin and quality. The popular wisdom of combining law
enforcement with drug treatment will hardly help to achieve this. For law
enforcement only tends to aggravate problems and treatment is both
fruitless and ethically questionable where it is not requested by the drug
user.
Eric Ernst
IMPORTANT: Always include your address and telephone number
Please note: If you choose to use this letter as a model please modify it
at least somewhat so that the paper does not receive numerous copies of the
same letter and so that the original author receives credit for his/her
work.
—————————————————————————-
TO SUBSCRIBE, DONATE, VOLUNTEER TO HELP, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL SEE
http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm
TO UNSUBSCRIBE SEE
http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm
ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts
3 Tips for Letter Writers http://www.mapinc.org/3tips.htm
Letter Writers Style Guide http://www.mapinc.org/style.htm
****************************************************************************
Prepared by Eric Ernst
Focus Alert Specialist