• Cannabis & Hemp

    Judge Rejects Effort to Keep Pot Sites Open

    Pubdate: Tue, 4 May 2010
    Source: Orange County Register, The (CA)
    Copyright: 2010 The Orange County Register
    Contact: [email protected]
    Authors: Erika I. Ritchie and Ellyn Pak
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Orange+County
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?253 (Cannabis – Medicinal – U.S.)

    JUDGE REJECTS EFFORT TO KEEP POT SITES OPEN

    SANTA ANA – A federal judge has rejected a request by four Orange County medical marijuana patients for a temporary injunction preventing Lake Forest and Costa Mesa from shutting down marijuana dispensaries in their cities.

    The four patients – Marla James, Wayne Washington, James Armatrout and Charles Daniel – argued through their attorney Matthew Pappas that the Americans with Disabilities Act gave disabled people a federally protected right to use medical marijuana if such use is legal under state law and done with appropriate supervision.

    The four were asking the court to temporarily prevent the cities from taking any further action against medical marijuana collectives; bar the cities from violating the rights of qualified people under the ADA; award damages for past actions in violation of the ADA; and award attorneys’ fees.

    Pappas argued his clients would suffer irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction against the cities.

    U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Guilford’s, however, ruled in favor of the cities.

    In his judgment filed Friday, he concluded: “At this stage, the court agrees with defendants. Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, and under that Act, it currently has no medical purpose.”

    Pappas said he is reviewing the ruling and considering options. “We’ll certainly consider appealing the to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,” he said.

    Continued:  http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10.n338.a02.html

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    D.C. Set to Vote on Legalizing Marijuana, Already a Widely Used Drug

    Newshawk: Please Write a LTE www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides
    Pubdate: Tue, 4 May 2010
    Source: Washington Post (DC)
    Page: A01, Front Page
    Copyright: 2010 The Washington Post Company
    Contact: http://mapinc.org/url/mUgeOPdZ
    Authors: Paul Schwartzman and Annys Shin, Washington Post Staff Writer
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?420 (Cannabis – Popular)
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?253 (Cannabis – Medicinal – U.S.)

    D.C. SET TO VOTE ON LEGALIZING MARIJUANA, ALREADY A WIDELY USED DRUG

    Just after 11 one morning last week, two men and two women, all in their early 20s, sat on a basketball court behind Dunbar High School in Northwest Washington and filled an empty cigar with marijuana — their first hit of the day.

    Also that day, at a picnic table by the Oxon Run stream, east of the Anacostia River, five men played dominoes and passed a joint.

    And at an Adams Morgan park, as dog walkers and bicyclists wandered by, a 23-year-old man in a Pittsburgh Pirates cap rolled a thick joint using cherry-flavored paper. “This is hitting nice,” he said moments later, forecasting that he would smoke five or six more before day’s end.

    The D.C. Council is set to vote Tuesday on legalizing medical marijuana, thereby allowing the chronically ill — including those with HIV, glaucoma or cancer — to buy pot from dispensaries in Washington.

    Yet marijuana is already ubiquitous in many parts of the city, as demonstrated by federal surveys showing that Washingtonians’ fondness for weed is among the strongest in the country — and growing.

    The popular image of the nation’s capital leans toward the straight and narrow, a town of over-achieving, button-down bureaucrats, lawyers and lobbyists. But meander through any neighborhood from Congress Heights to Friendship Heights, and Washingtonians across race and class lines can be found lighting up.

    Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n337/a09.html

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    US CA: ACLU Attacks Draft Pot-Dispensary Ordinance

    Pubdate: Mon, 3 May 2010
    Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA)
    Webpage: http://mapinc.org/url/G1Dn3nUX
    Copyright: 2010 North County Times
    Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/app/forms/letters/index.php
    Website: http://www.nctimes.com
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080
    Author: Edward Sifuentes
    Cited: Americans for Safe Access http://www.americansforsafeaccess.org/
    Cited: Drug Policy Alliance http://www.drugpolicy.org/
    Cited: American Civil Liberties Union in San Diego http://www.aclusandiego.org/issues.php?sub_cat_sel=000066
    Cited: San Diego County Board of Supervisors http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/general/bos.html
    Referenced: The draft ordinance http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/POD_09-007_Medical_Marijuana.pdf
    Referenced: The ACLU letter to the County http://mapinc.org/url/gReM0Nkx
    Referenced: Conant v. Walters http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/conantvwalters.pdf
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/San+Diego+County+supervisors

    ACLU ATTACKS DRAFT POT-DISPENSARY ORDINANCE

    Proposal Would Violate Patient Privacy Rules, Activists Say

    The county’s proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance would violate patient privacy laws because it opens patient lists and other records to law enforcement, medical marijuana advocates and civil rights groups say.

    County officials released a draft of the document in March. It was heavily criticized by patient advocacy groups and others, including Americans for Safe Access, the Drug Policy Alliance and the American Civil Liberties Union in San Diego.

    Since the criticisms started to pour in, county officials have refused to answer questions about the ordinance, including whether any medical professionals helped draft it.

    Critics, including medical marijuana activist Rudy Reyes, say the county’s refusal to work cooperatively with patients and advocacy groups led to a poorly written document.

    The ACLU, which last year won a lawsuit against the county forcing it to implement the state’s medical marijuana ID program, said in a letter criticizing the proposed ordinance that county leaders once again were trying to deter patients’ right to access the drug.

    “The county is trying to do indirectly what it couldn’t do directly, which is ban collectives in the county,” said David Blair-Loy, legal director for the ACLU in San Diego.

    Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n334/a03.html

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    US CA: OPED: It’s Time to Legalize and Regulate Pot

    Pubdate: Sat, 1 May 2010
    Source: Sacramento Bee (CA)
    Page: 13A
    Webpage: http://mapinc.org/url/JiVvKvjJ
    Copyright: 2010 The Sacramento Bee
    Contact: http://www.sacbee.com/2006/09/07/19629/submit-letters-to-the-editor.html
    Website: http://www.sacbee.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/376
    Author: John Russo
    Cited: Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act http://www.taxcannabis.org/
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Tax+Cannabis+Act
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis – California)

    IT’S TIME TO LEGALIZE AND REGULATE POT

    When it comes to marijuana policy, California has been stuck in a fairy tale for decades.

    This particular fairy tale is like “The Emperor’s New Clothes.”

    Everybody can see that marijuana prohibition has done nothing to prevent its use, and that arresting tens of thousands Californians every year for misdemeanor possession diverts police resources away from violent felonies.

    And nobody is blind to the fact that marijuana has funded and empowered the sociopathic drug cartels responsible for untold suffering and violence on both sides of the border.

    It’s time for Californians to acknowledge the truth about the war on marijuana. Not only is it ineffective, it directly compromises public safety in our state.

    In November, California can become the first state to recognize this reality by passing the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010.

    This smart initiative would legalize personal cultivation and possession of small amounts of marijuana for adults over the age of 21. Individual cities and counties could strictly regulate distribution and sales as they see fit. It would increase the penalty for providing marijuana to minors, and sales by unlicensed dealers those now funding the cartels and wreaking havoc in our cities would still be illegal.

    California banned cannabis almost a century ago based on sensational and unscientific notions about the plant. Modern prohibition, based on some of the same anachronistic ideas, has failed to control widespread availability and use. Like the 18th Amendment’s prohibition against alcohol, it is routinely overlooked by millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens.

    Others have made common-sense arguments about the economic benefits of taxing this major industry. Cannabis is by far the largest cash crop in the state, with an estimated value of about $14 billion. Estimated tax revenue from sales alone would be $1.4 billion money that could go to police, public schools and other critical services now being gutted by California’s budget crisis.

    As the city attorney of Oakland a city where dozens of people are killed in drug-related murders every year my primary concern is the war on marijuana’s collateral damage to public safety.

    Black-market marijuana is a main source of fuel powering the vast criminal enterprises that threaten peace on our streets and weaken national security on our borders. According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, the Mexican drug cartels get more than 60 percent of their revenue from selling marijuana in the United States.

    Money is the oxygen of these organizations. For decades, our approach to fighting violent drug gangs has been like trying to put out a house fire with a watering can. Why not try shutting off the fire’s main oxygen supply?

    The actual costs of enforcing prohibition are hard to estimate. We spend hundreds of millions of dollars and countless law enforcement hours arresting people for low-level marijuana crimes, further overburdening courts and prisons. Jail beds needed for marijuana offenders could be “used for other criminals who are now being released early because of a lack of jail space,” the state Legislative Analyst’s Office wrote.

    More than 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor marijuana possession in 2008. That same year, about 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved statewide. The reality is that resources tied up fighting marijuana would be better spent solving and preventing violent felonies and other major crimes.

    Regulating and controlling marijuana is really a law-and-order measure. It takes marijuana off street corners and out of the hands of children. It cuts off a huge source of revenue to the violent gangsters who now control the market. And it gives law enforcement more capacity to focus on what really matters to Californians making our communities safer.

    It’s time we call marijuana prohibition what it is an outdated and costly approach that has failed to benefit our society. In November, we will finally have the chance to take a rational course with the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act.

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    UK: Column: Why Can’t Our Politicians Come Clean on Drugs?

    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis – California)

    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis – United Kingdom)

    WHY CAN’T OUR POLITICIANS COME CLEAN ON DRUGS?

    What is the single most curable evil afflicting community life in London? The answer is the criminalisation of drug use under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act.

    It blights half the capital’s youth at some stage or other. It hovers as a black cloud over every neighbourhood, pub and street corner.  It causes crime and gangland disorder.  It packs the courts and fills the prisons.  It costs billions of pounds in personal loss and public spending.

    Needless to say, not one party in the current General Election is prepared to discuss it.  As a result, London is about to be taught a lesson in social policy by, of all places, America.

    As I whiled away last week waiting in Los Angeles for Her Majesty’s Government to find an ash cloud policy, I decided to pop into one of many local cannabis “dispensaries” — strictly in the interests of research.

    Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n325/a03.html

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    New Zealand: Bust ‘Breaks Cornerstone’ of Cannabis Industry

    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?251 (Cannabis – New Zealand)

    BUST ‘BREAKS CORNERSTONE’ OF CANNABIS INDUSTRY

    Police Minister Judith Collins has congratulated police on shutting down what they allege is a major source of equipment for commercial cannabis growers.

    A nationwide drugs bust was executed today, closing down the 16 branches and distribution centre of hydroponic gardening chain Switched On Gardener.

    Hundreds of people, ranging in age from 20 to 60, were arrested and will appear before the courts, with many of them facing charges for selling equipment to make secret gardens for growing cannabis.

    Continues http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n326/a12.html

  • Cannabis & Hemp

    It’s MardiGrass time! That means the Ganja Faeries are dancing in Nimbin

    Visitors from around the planet are already gathering in Nimbin for MardiGrass – the famous cannabis law reform rally – this Saturday and Sunday, May 1 and 2.

    Mardigrass has been going since 1993 in protest against the prohibition of cannabis and will continue “every year until we are not criminals,” MardiGrass spokesperson Michael Balderstone said.

    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n326/a01.html and http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n326/a02.html