• Focus Alerts

    #336 Defund Terrorists – End Prohibition

    Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006
    Subject: #336 Defund Terrorists – End Prohibition

    DEFUND TERRORISTS – END PROHIBITION

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #336 – Wednesday, 27 September 2006

    Yesterday morning, the largest newspaper in Florida – The St.
    Petersburg Times – was one of three papers that printed a notable and
    timely column from John Tierney of the New York Times. Also yesterday
    the column was printed in the Arizona Republic, Arizona’s largest
    newspaper. Details are at http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1283/a04.html

    Mr. Tierney has written several excellent columns highlighting various
    critical flaws of status-quo public drug policies in the past.
    Tierney’s coverage has included the DEA’s war on chronic pain
    patients, various aspects of Washington-inspired reefer madness and
    the excessive militarization of domestic police forces against U.S.
    citizens.

    This time, he takes a more global look at the impact of U.S. drug war
    policies in relation to Afghanistan, to South America and to Mexico.
    He observes the incredible financial empowerment to criminal cartels
    and to terrorist organizations inspired by the drug war. And in two
    paragraphs he identifies the smartest and most productive response
    left unapplied – ending drug prohibition.

    Please consider writing letters to the St. Petersburg Times and other
    newspapers when they print John Tierney’s columns. Past columns may be
    reviewed at this link, where future columns will also be posted:

    http://www.mapinc.org/author/John+Tierney

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1280/a09.html

    Pubdate: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
    Source: St. Petersburg Times (FL)
    Copyright: 2006 New York Times News Service
    Contact: http://www.sptimes.com/letters/
    Author: John Tierney

    IN WAR ON LEAF, ALL LOSE

    U.S. Drug Policies Are Helping Terrorists and Other Enemies Abroad.
    Repeal of Prohibition Is the Only Workable Solution.

    The most enlightening speech at the United Nations this week, I’m
    sorry to say, was the one by Evo Morales of Bolivia.

    I don’t mean it was a good or even a coherent speech. That would be
    too much to expect from the world leaders’ annual gasathon.

    The rhetorical bar is extremely low. Morales, like his friend Hugo
    Chavez, spent much of his time ranting about a new world order based
    on the economic policies that have worked such wonders in Cuba.

    But Morales at least brought a visual aid – and thank God, it wasn’t a
    book by Noam Chomsky. Unlike Chavez, he didn’t assign reading homework
    to the U.N. Instead, he held up a small green coca leaf, and when he
    talked about international drug policies, he made more sense than
    anyone in the United States government.

    We’ve sacrificed soldiers’ lives and spent billions of dollars trying
    to stop peasants from growing coca in the Andes and opium in
    Afghanistan and other countries. But the crops have kept flourishing,
    and in America the street price of cocaine and heroin has plummeted in
    the past two decades.

    Meanwhile, we’ve been helping terrorists and other enemies abroad. The
    Senate has voted to send Afghanistan more money for programs to harass
    opium growers, whose discontent is already being exploited by the
    resurgent Taliban. In the Andes, American drug policies made Bolivians
    so mad that they elected Morales, a former leader of the coca growers,
    who campaigned for president on the kind of anti-American rhetoric he
    spouted this week.

    At the U.N., he denounced “the colonization of the Andean peoples” by
    imperialists intent on criminalizing coca. “It has been demonstrated
    that the coca leaf does no harm to human health,” he said, a statement
    that’s much closer to the truth than Washington’s take on these
    leaves. The white powder sold on the streets of America is dangerous
    because it’s such a concentrated form of cocaine, but just about any
    substance can be perilous at a high enough dose.

    South Americans routinely drink coca tea and chew coca leaves. The
    tiny amount of cocaine in the leaves is a mild stimulant and appetite
    suppressant that isn’t more frightening than coffee or colas – in
    fact, it might be less addictive than caffeine, and on balance it
    might even be good for you. When the World Health Organization asked
    scientists to investigate coca in the 1990’s, they said it didn’t seem
    to cause health problems and might yield health benefits.

    But American officials fought against the publication of the report
    and against the loosening of restrictions on coca products, just as
    they’ve resisted proposals to let Afghan farmers sell opium to
    pharmaceutical companies instead of to narco-traffickers allied with
    the Taliban. The American policy is to keep attacking the crops, even
    if that impoverishes peasants – or, more typically, turns them into
    criminals.

    Drug prohibition in Bolivia and Afghanistan has done exactly what
    alcohol prohibition did in America: it has financed organized crime.

    The only workable solution is to repeal prohibition. Give Afghan poppy
    growers a chance to sell opium for legal painkilling medicines; give
    Andean peasants a legal international market for their crops in
    products like gum, lozenges, tea and other drinks. As Ethan Nadelmann
    of the Drug Policy Alliance proposes, “Put the coca back in Coca-Cola.”

    That’s what Morales wants, too, and he’s right to complain about
    American imperialists criminalizing a substance that has been used for
    centuries in the Andes. If gringos are abusing a product made from
    coca leaves, that’s a problem for America to deal with at home. The
    most cost-effective way is through drug treatment programs, not
    through futile efforts to cut off the supply.

    America makes plenty of things that are bad for foreigners’ health –
    fatty Big Macs, sugary Cokes, deadly Marlboros – but we’d never let
    foreigners tell us what to make and not make. The Saudis can fight
    alcoholism by forbidding the sale of Jack Daniels, but we’d think they
    were crazy if they ordered us to eradicate fields of barley in Tennessee.

    They’d be even crazier if they tried to wipe out every field of barley
    in the world, but that’s what our drug policy has come to. We think we
    can solve our cocaine problem by getting rid of coca leaves, but all
    we’re doing is empowering demagogues like Evo Morales. Our drug
    warriors put him in power. Now he gets to perform show and tell for
    the world.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    Join Steve and other LTE writing friends of MAP Tuesday evenings at 9
    p.m. EDT (8pm CDT, 7pm MDT, 6pm PDT) for a roundtable discussion of
    how to write LTEs that are likely to be printed.

    See: http://mapinc.org/resource/paltalk.htm for all details on how
    you can participate in this important meeting of leading minds in
    reform. Discussion is conducted with live Voice (microphone and
    speakers all that is needed) and also via text messaging.

    The Paltalk software is free and easy to download and
    install.

    The password for this gathering will be: welcome-pal (all lower
    case)

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected]) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: S Heath, Media Activism Facilitator www.mapinc.org/resource
    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #335 Stop The DEA Subversion Of Elections

    Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006
    Subject: #335 Stop The DEA Subversion Of Elections

    STOP THE DEA SUBVERSION OF ELECTIONS

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #335 – Tuesday, 29 August 2006

    Sunday we learned that the Drug Enforcement Agency is encouraging it’s
    agents to use government time and equipment to oppose the Colorado
    marijuana initiative. They claim that this action is legal, not a
    violation of the Hatch Act.

    Our government considers the direct government interference by the
    governments of other countries in their elections to be unfair — an
    ethical standard which should apply equally in the United States.

    Please contact your elected representatives at both federal and state
    level to demand that the DEA and the Office of National Drug Control
    Policy, including the Drug Czar, refrain from the subversion of the
    initiative and referendum process in the cities and states where
    marijuana initiatives will be on the ballot. Our tax dollars should
    never be used to undermine initiatives.

    Please also contact the DEA offices in your area to let them know what
    you think of their unethical political activities. Phone numbers are
    on this webpage http://www.dea.gov/contactinfo.htm You may remind them
    that the news reports puts the lie to their often stated position that
    they only enforce the laws – that they do not write the laws.

    The article, reprinted in other Colorado newspapers, that exposed DEA
    Agent Michael Moore’s unethical activities is at http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1137/a09.html

    Please also do what you are able to do to support the various
    marijuana related initiatives. Below is a list of initiatives pending
    a vote at the state and local level. Please use the links to find out
    how to donate or otherwise support the initiatives.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    *********************************************************************

    CALIFORNIA:

    Santa Barbara Lowest Law Enforcement Priority Policy Ordinance
    http://sensiblesantabarbara.org

    Santa Cruz Lowest Law Enforcement Priority Policy Ordinance
    http://www.taxandregulate.org/sc06/index.htm

    Santa Monica Lowest Law Enforcement Priority Policy Ordinance
    http://www.sensiblesantamonica.org

    COLORADO:

    The Colorado Alcohol-Marijuana Equalization Initiative
    http://www.saferchoice.org/safercolorado/

    MICHIGAN:

    The Flint Coalition for Compassionate Care will have a medical
    marijuana initiative on the ballot in first city wide election of
    2007, possibly in February or May. Details will be posted to this
    webpage when they are available http://www.drugsense.org/caip

    MONTANA:

    The Missoula County Lowest Law Enforcement Priority initiative has
    just been approved for the November ballot http://www.responsiblecrimepolicy.org

    NEVADA:

    Question 7 on the Nevada ballot http://www.regulatemarijuana.org

    SOUTH DAKOTA:

    The only state wide medical marijuana initiative on the ballot this
    year http://www.sdmedicalmarijuana.org

    **********************************************************************

    Notes:

    Updates on local initiatives will be added to this webpage as we
    receive additional information http://www.drugsense.org/caip

    Your letters to the editor help move public opinion towards supporting
    change in marijuana policies and law. Every day new targets for your
    letter writing efforts may be found at http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake for DrugSense =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #334 Save Lives By Preserving InSite

    Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006
    Subject: #334 Save Lives By Preserving InSite

    SAVE LIVES BY PRESERVING INSITE

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #334 – Saturday, 19 August 2006

    For the past 35 years Canadian public drug policies have often taken a
    more progressive and rational approach to the very real problems in
    our society connected to drug use and abuse. These more sensible
    responses often conflict with the harsh responses preferred by the
    government of the United States.

    One of the most progressive and harm-reducing public policies enacted
    in Canada has been the InSite safe injection facility in Vancouver,
    B.C. InSite provides sterile needles and a nurse to attend to
    overdoses. However, its three-year-old legal exemption under federal
    drug law expires on September 12th. Today it’s future is still in doubt.

    Yesterday one of Canada’s two national newspapers, the Globe and Mail,
    printed an editorial (below) which summarizes the issues well. It, and
    the dozens of articles printed in various newspapers in the past week
    are all superb targets for your letters. All the major Canadian
    newspapers have printed items. More articles and opinion items are
    likely to be printed in the weeks ahead.

    Please click this link to read the articles and, please,
    respond:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topics/InSite

    Letter writers from around the world may help by writing the Canadian
    newspapers, as this helps Canadians understand that the views of the
    people are not necessarily the views of their government.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    *********************************************************************

    Canadians:

    Please visit the website InSite for Community Safety
    http://www.communityinsite.ca for information and assistance about
    lobbying your federal government to reauthorize and support InSite.

    *********************************************************************

    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1093/a04.html

    Pubdate: Fri, 18 Aug 2006

    Source: Globe and Mail (Canada)

    CONTACT: [email protected]

    Copyright: 2006, The Globe and Mail Company

    THE SAFE-INJECTION MATH

    Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has to decide whether it
    wants to adopt the war-on-drugs mentality of the United States or the
    more pragmatic, harm-reduction approach of Canada.

    Insite, a safe-injection site in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside,
    provides sterile needles and a nurse to attend to over-doses. It’s a
    modest attempt to reduce some of the harm caused by illegal drug use.
    Its three-year-old legal exemption under federal drug law expires on
    Sept. 12.

    During the last election campaign, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper
    said he did not want taxpayers’ money used to fund drug use. (Insite
    receives $500,000 a year from Health Canada.) The signals are not
    good. But the federal cabinet minister from Vancouver, David Emerson,
    supports the site and says, “If the weight of arguments are in favour,
    I’m sure the government will be in favour.”

    So let us consider the weight of arguments. On the one side: more
    livable streets, fewer deaths and a slower spread of disease in a
    neighbourhood with Third World rates of HIV-AIDs and hepatitis C. On
    the other, the site might be seen as a form of official permission for
    drug use; an official with the U.S. administration called it
    “state-sponsored suicide.”

    On average, 607 people a day, most of them long-term addicts, show up.
    In an 18-month period, the site reported 453 overdoses, but no
    deaths. Assuming there would otherwise have been a 5 per cent
    mortality rate from those overdoses, 22 lives were saved. The sterile
    equipment helps check the spread of disease. Studies in peer-reviewed
    publications such as the Canadian Medical Association Journal have
    found fewer drug users injecting in public, fewer used syringes left
    on the ground and more users referred to treatment programs. No
    evidence has been reported of increased addiction rates linked to the
    site. No increase has been found in drug-related crime around the
    site.

    Having a safe place for the long-term addicts of Canada’s most
    down-and-out neighbourhood to inject drugs is hardly radical. A more
    provocative form of harm reduction is being studied in Vancouver and
    Montreal, in which doctors prescribe free heroin to 170 addicts who
    have tried methadone treatment without success. Ottawa’s funding arm,
    the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, gave this initiative
    $8.1-million. And that was wise. Canada should be looking at a range
    of practical solutions to our cities’ drug problems.

    The weight of arguments depends on whether the scale contains an
    ideological tilt. If Mr. Harper’s government wishes to reject the
    scientific evidence in favour of a moral absolutist position on drug
    use, let him say so.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    Join Steve and other LTE writing friends of MAP this Tuesday evening
    at 9 p.m. EDT for a roundtable discussion of how to write LTEs that
    are likely to be printed.

    See: http://mapinc.org/resource/paltalk.htm for all details on how
    you can participate in this important meeting of leading minds in
    reform. Discussion is conducted with live Voice (microphone and
    speakers all that is needed) and also via text messaging.

    The Paltalk software is free and easy to download and
    install.

    The password for this gathering will be: welcome-pal (all lower
    case)

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Stephen Heath, MAP Media Activism Facilitator =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #333 Stop The Reefer Madness, Senator Hatch!

    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006
    Subject: #333 Stop The Reefer Madness, Senator Hatch!

    STOP THE REEFER MADNESS, SENATOR HATCH!

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #333 – Tuesday, 25 July 2006

    Monday morning brought a breath of fresh air from the July 24 opinion
    page of the Washington Times.

    Terry Michael – the executive director of the Washington Center for
    Politics and Journalism – authored an “open letter to Senator Orrin
    Hatch (UT), calling for an end to the socially devastating War on Drugs.

    Senator Hatch received likely unwanted attention this past month when
    he extended his strong personal and political influence to facilitate
    the release of an American citizen facing drug charges in the country
    of Dubai. Among other reasons offered for his action, Hatch said he
    made the calls out of his long-standing angst with mandatory minimum
    sentencing guidelines, which require judges to issue sentences without
    taking into account a person’s past history or specific
    circumstances.

    See: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n918/a03.html

    Mr. Michael’s appeal was that Senator Hatch and other federal policy
    makers who recognize one or more aspects of the failed drug war should
    give more careful review to the wide range of personal and social
    destruction wrought by a policy of drug Prohibition.

    Please consider writing a succinct Letter to the Editor and sending it
    to the Washington Times with your own personal appeal to federal
    lawmakers to call an end to The War on Drugs.

    **********************************************************************

    Extra Credit: Based on their history, we believe it likely the
    Washington Times will provide space for a rebuttal commentary in the
    coming week for either Senator Hatch, Drug Czar John Walters or
    another leading federal policy maker who supports the policy of drug
    Prohibition. Please watch the MAP DrugNews feed
    http://www.drugnews.org and consider writing a separate LTE in
    response to this anticipated column.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    Contact: The Washington Times [email protected]

    **********************************************************************
    US DC: OPED: Legalize Drugs

    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n967/a02.html
    Pubdate: Mon, 24 Jul 2006
    Source: Washington Times (DC)
    Copyright: 2006 News World Communications, Inc.
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.washingtontimes.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/492
    Author: Terry Michael
    Note: Terry Michael runs a program to teach college journalism
    students about politics, and writes at his “libertarian Democrat”
    blog, www.terrymichael.net
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Orrin+Hatch
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction)

    LEGALIZE DRUGS

    An open letter to Sen. Orrin Hatch: stop reefer madness here, as
    well as in Dubai.

    Mr. Hatch, you have demonstrated willingness to act beyond ideology,
    when a practical approach makes more sense than “conservative” or
    “liberal” purity.

    You did so recently, for an American victim of draconian drug
    penalties of the United Arab Emirates. This is an appeal for your
    leadership to stop the equally devastating American “War on Drugs.”

    Many officials admit behind closed doors that our drug policy needs
    radical revision. Few will say so publicly. This “third rail” of
    politics is exacerbated by the collusion of mainstream media,
    suspending usual rules of journalistic practice, publishing government
    propaganda without quoting critics of drug-war policy.

    Our policies result in tremendous harm creation, about which much has
    been written, but I’ll summarize here:

    Denial of liberty. Our drug war constitutes an assault on individual
    liberty, privacy and choice, from both the left and right. Liberals
    fight for a woman’s right to abortion and conservatives go to the
    ramparts to defend gun owners, but both agree to throw into prison an
    adult who smokes dried, leafy vegetation. With impunity, we can drink
    ourselves stupid and destroy our lungs with tobacco. But using a
    recreational substance as old as wine will get us jailed.

    Waste of treasury. When our resources should be directed at lawful
    attempts to keep dangerous politicized religious fanatics from
    entering our country, we spend tens of billions futilely trying to
    interdict chemicals, most of which, in moderation, are demonstrably no
    more harmful to the body than alcohol and tobacco.

    Government-created violent black market. Alcohol did not create Al
    Capone. Prohibition created Al Capone, with the mayhem, official
    corruption and murder that accompanied the 18th Amendment. And
    cocaine does not create drug cartels. America’s War on Drugs creates
    drug cartels.

    Government violence against its own people. With guns blazing, law
    enforcement agencies not only deny life, liberty and property to those
    who work in the government stimulated black market; they rack up
    untold “collateral damage,” maiming and killing innocent bystanders,
    in countless stings gone bad.

    Promoting disrespect for the rule of law. With millions of Americans
    scoffing at the China-like oppressiveness of the War on Drugs, our
    policies undermine respect for the rule of law and our democratic
    policy-making institutions. As the drug warriors clog our courts and
    fill our jails, we disrupt the lives of the poor and the powerless,
    who can’t afford crafty lawyers and have no political
    connections.

    Health harm creation. Perhaps most important, our policy is creating
    untold health harm to millions, particularly the young. We educate
    them about the responsible use of two potentially very dangerous, but
    legal, substances, but we try our best to keep them ignorant of the
    real effects, and side effects, of other psychoactives. While
    hundreds of thousands die each year from the short- and long-term
    health damage of alcohol and tobacco, no one succumbs to marijuana,
    and remarkably few die from other illegal drugs.

    None of that argues for use of psychoactives of any kind, legal or
    currently illegal, particularly by young people with unformed
    intellectual and emotional lives. But it makes a powerful case for
    bringing other substances out of the shadows with decriminalization
    and legalization, and for spending some of those wasted billions on
    education, harm reduction, and, when needed, addiction treatment. The
    obsession of drug warriors with cutting off supplies of softer drugs
    has pushed thousands to try the bathtub gin of Neo-Prohibitionism,
    crystal methamphetamine.

    So, Mr. Hatch, I am hopeful your efforts to save an American being
    abused in Dubai will cause you to re examine the drug-war abuse
    millions of Americans face here everyday.

    I understand how difficult it will be to return to drug policy sanity.
    I had jury duty this summer and was sent out on a panel for a case of
    marijuana possession with intent to distribute. I wasn’t chosen for
    the jury, but it made me realize how much the Drug War Industrial
    Complex has to lose if we change our laws. Probably a third of the
    jobs in that courthouse would disappear. Thousands of lawyers,
    prosecutors, DEA agents, and prison guards would have to find
    productive employment. Local law enforcement offices would lose much
    of their federal funding for high-tech toys.

    But America would be a less violent and healthier nation. Billions
    fewer tax dollars would be disbursed as welfare to the legal
    industries formed around the drug war. And official corruption,
    stimulated by the lucrative black market we have created with our
    policies, would diminish, not just in Colombia, Mexico and
    Afghanistan, but right here in America.

    Senator, it will take courage to lead in the battle to stop this war
    on America and its founding principles. But you have shown the wisdom
    to change your mind before.

    Several decades ago, my Baby Boom generation laughed at “Reefer
    Madness.” Then we made it public policy. It’s time to stop the madness.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    You are welcome to join Steve and other LTE writing friends of MAP
    Tuesday evenings at 9 p.m. Eastern, 8 p.m. Central, 7 p.m. Mountain,
    or 6 p.m. Pacific, for a roundtable discussion of how to write LTEs
    that get print and specifically how to best respond to our Focus Alerts.

    In addition, you can learn from Steve how you can participate in our
    newly-formed LTE Team.

    See: http://mapinc.org/resource/paltalk.htm for all details on how
    you can participate in this important meeting of leading minds in
    reform. Discussion is conducted with live Voice (microphone and
    speakers all that is needed) and also via text messaging.

    The Paltalk software is free and easy to download and
    install.

    The password for this gathering will be: welcome-pal (all lower
    case)

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************
    Prepared by: Stephen Heath, MAP Media Activism Facilitator =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #332 – Former Drug Czars Declare “Victory” In War On Drugs

    Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006
    Subject: #332 – Former Drug Czars Declare “Victory” In War On Drugs

    FORMER DRUG CZARS DECLARE “VICTORY” IN WAR ON DRUGS

    ********************* PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE ************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #332 – Sunday, 2 July 2006

    It’s OVER! Success! We Win!

    So was the composite declaration of a recent gathering of former
    United States drug czars on June 17, which marked the 35th anniversary
    of the war’s beginning in 1971 with the appointment of Dr. Jerome H.
    Jaffe, a psychiatrist, as the first White House drug czar.

    Also in attendance was Columbus Dispatch columnist John Burnham and he
    enthusiastically parroted the self-aggrandizing former public
    officials and their accompanying staff lackeys.

    Citing tired references to supposed reductions in illegal drug use by
    a sub-class of teenagers and within a narrow group of relatively
    unpopular drugs, the czars ignored the huge collateral damage done to
    American society and communities by the failed policy of drug
    Prohibition.

    And in perhaps the most startling claim from the gathering, Burnham
    echoed the czars’ belief that America’s first experiment with
    Prohibition (1920-1934) was ended only following a huge propaganda
    campaign. Left unspoken was the implied message that American
    communities would be better off today had alcohol Prohibition remained
    in effect with all production and commercial distribution of alcohol
    in the control of criminal gangs and cartels.

    An interesting side note to this event two weeks ago is that the
    Executive Director of one of the world’s leading drug policy reform
    organizations – Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance
    http://www.drugpolicy.org – was refused permission to attend, even
    for the purpose of listening and not speaking. Perhaps it would have
    been difficult to celebrate “victory” with a non-drug warrior in attendance.

    Please consider writing a succinct Letter to the Editor and sending it
    to The Columbus Dispatch.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do – it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    CONTACT Information:

    The Columbus Dispatch (US OH) [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    US OH: OPED: Former Drug Czars Believe Their War Has Been Won

    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n869/a05.html
    Newshawk: http://www.illinoisnorml.org/
    Pubdate: Fri, 30 Jun 2006
    Source: Columbus Dispatch (OH)
    Copyright: 2006 The Columbus Dispatch
    Author: John C . Burnham
    Note: John Burnham is research professor of history at Ohio State
    University, where he specializes in the history of medicine and American
    social history.

    FORMER DRUG CZARS BELIEVE THEIR WAR HAS BEEN WON

    The United States has won the war against illegal drugs. That was the
    conclusion of a unique gathering on June 17, which marked the 35th
    anniversary of the war’s beginning in 1971 with the appointment of Dr.
    Jerome H. Jaffe, a psychiatrist, as the first White House drug czar.

    Jaffe was joined at the anniversary gathering by six other former
    czars, Dr. Robert L. Du Pont, Dr. Peter G. Bourne, Lee I.
    Dogoloff, Dr. Donald Ian Mac-Donald, Lee Brown and retired Army Gen.
    Barry R. McCaffrey. Also attending were 20 former staff members and
    a handful of experts, including me, a specialist historian.

    The meeting, sponsored and hosted by the University of Maryland, was
    held for the purpose of making a historical record.

    The seven former czars and former staff members held remarkably
    unanimous views, though they come from a variety of backgrounds and
    included Democrats and Republicans who worked for five very different
    presidents. And what they had to say was often surprising.

    The main conclusion that we won the war on drugs was the biggest
    surprise, because advocates of illegal drugs have in recent years
    filled the media with rhetoric about “the failed war on drugs.” The
    czars’ straightforward conclusion may come as a shock, but, as they
    outlined what the war was about, what they had to say made a lot of
    sense.

    Thirty-five years ago, the big worry was the veterans who were
    returning from Vietnam who had been using illegal drugs. And the drug
    causing overwhelming concern was heroin. A hard-headed public-health
    approach showed an alarming number of deaths directly related to
    heroin, not to mention crimes committed by addicts. As the veterans
    showed that their use did not continue after their return to the
    United States, and as methadone-maintenance programs came into place,
    along with enforcement and education, heroin use declined, and even
    more dramatic was the decline in heroin-related deaths. This was the
    great victory of the war on drugs. A recent small uptick in illegal
    drug use is remarkably insignificant compared with the original problem.

    Only in the 1980s, when the price of cocaine, in the form of crack,
    went down did that drug become a significant public-health problem.
    But what about marijuana? At that time, the serious effects of pot
    smoking were largely unknown. But in the late 1970s, the parents
    movement developed parents who had seen what happened when their kids
    got addicted to marijuana and their young brains got fried. This was
    a huge group of very angry people, and they were political dynamite.

    The main tension in the office of drug czar was between enforcement
    and treatment. Congress would fund enforcement but did not like
    treatment, although one czar told of taking a couple of reluctant
    members of Congress to view a treatment center and see how much money
    treatment was saving the public as addicts, often under court
    coercion, were enabled to work productively.

    For historians like me, the collective experience of the former czars
    provides two lessons. The first is unwelcome to extremists of the
    right and left and their shady commercial allies: Prohibitory laws can
    work. Historians have established that the 1920s experiment in
    alcohol prohibition was successful and was repealed in 1933 only
    because of a massive, well-financed propaganda campaign. The
    leadership of the drug czars in reducing supply and demand of illegal
    drugs is reflected not only in the public-health statistics. They can
    also cite public opinion polls. Thirty-five years ago, illegal drugs
    were usually first or second and no lower than fourth as public
    concerns. Now the drugs issue trails many other problems.

    Everyone at the conference knew that the problem is going to continue
    for American society, but at a much lower level than 35 years before.
    That is what laws do: They attempt to control problems, not bring
    perfection. Laws against murder provide hope to control the problem,
    not abolish murder.

    The second lesson is more subtle. The title czar was ironic, because
    the appointees had no direct, executive power. Instead, they
    coordinated the many federal and local agencies dealing with aspects
    of the drug problem and drug-law enforcement. The czars used
    persuasion. They got a drug detection and treatment system into the
    armed services, where the programs served as models for private
    businesses and other units. When new substances of abuse came along,
    often the czar was able to get officials and private businesses,
    especially pharmaceutical companies, to get one substance or another
    restricted before it became a major problem.

    So what if the amusingly designated czars had no real power? They
    proved that in American government, there can be impressive leadership
    beyond formal power.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    And of course, you are welcome to join Steve and other LTE writing
    friends of MAP this Tuesday evening at 9pm EDT for a roundtable
    discussion of how to write LTEs that get print and specifically how to
    best respond to this Focus Alert.

    See: http://mapinc.org/resource/paltalk.htm for all details on how
    you can participate in this important meeting of leading minds in
    reform. Discussion is conducted with live Voice (microphone and
    speakers all that is needed) and also via text messaging.

    The Paltalk software is free and easy to download and
    install.

    The password for this gathering will be PW: welcome-pal (all lower
    case)

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Stephen Heath, MAP Media Activism Facilitator

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #331 UN Agency Prevaricates

    Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006
    Subject: #331 UN Agency Prevaricates

    UN AGENCY PREVARICATES

    ******************** PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE ************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #331 – Wednesday, 28 June 2006

    Speaking at the launch of the World Drug Report in Washington Tuesday,
    Antonio Maria Costa, the executive director of the UN Office on Drugs
    and Crime, warned: “Policy reversals leave young people confused as to
    just how dangerous cannabis is. With cannabis-related health damage
    increasing, it is fundamentally wrong for countries to make cannabis
    control dependent on which party is in government.

    “The cannabis pandemic, like other challenges to public health,
    requires consensus, a consistent commitment across the political
    spectrum and by society at large. Today, the harmful characteristics
    of cannabis are no longer that different from those of other
    plant-based drugs such as cocaine and heroin.”

    The initial stories in the world’s press accepted the statements of
    prevaricator Costa at face value, as well as the report, which
    devotes it’s Second Chapter to marijuana “Cannabis: Why we should
    care.” The full report is at
    http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/WDR-2006.html

    But leading drug policy experts were quick to respond, not that their
    views have received press, yet.

    The Leading UK drugs charity DrugScope http://www.drugscope.org.uk
    responded “”DrugScope is surprised and concerned by the UNODC Chief’s
    comments regarding cannabis” said Martin Barnes, Chief Executive of
    DrugScope.

    “The UK government, education system and charities have worked hard in
    recent years to ensure our young people are given factual information
    about the relative harms of drugs. International evidence is clear
    that cocaine and heroin cause much greater health and social harms
    than cannabis and it is misleading and irresponsible to suggest
    otherwise. Cannabis is a harmful substance but the greater harms
    caused by cocaine and heroin should not be downplayed.

    “European evidence shows that although stronger strains of cannabis
    are available than 20 years ago, there has not been a significant
    increase overall in the use of more potent forms of the drug.””

    Canadian Senator Larry Campbell wrote “UNODC Executive Director,
    Antonio Maria Costa claims that the world is experiencing a
    devastating “cannabis pandemic.” This gentleman is the same person who
    said we were putting “cannabis oil” on pasta. It was pointed out that
    is was hemp oil which is not a sativa product. He didn’t know the
    difference and appeared not to care. Simply another high paid UN
    stooge. Isn’t it amazing that the US only supports the UN when they
    toe the US “drug war” line.”

    Some critical views of the UN report are starting to be printed. For
    example, the Vancouver Sun editorial “UN Drug Report Unintentionally
    Argues Against Prohibition” http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n840.a07.html

    Your letters to the editor in response to the articles in the world’s
    press can make a difference, encouraging more balanced views. Please
    go to the following link and respond to news clippings dated 27 June
    or later.

    http://www.mapinc.org/topics/World+Drug+Report

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    There are many sources of facts you may use to counter the United
    Nations prevarication. You may find some of these of value.

    From http://www.drugwardistortions.org Cannabis and Mental Illness
    http://www.drugwardistortions.org/distortion18.htm Marijuana Potency
    http://www.drugwardistortions.org/distortion11.htm

    From http://www.drugwarfacts.org Drug Control Policies Around The
    World http://www.drugwarfacts.org/internat.htm Marijuana
    http://www.drugwarfacts.org/marijuan.htm The Netherlands Compared With
    The United States http://www.drugwarfacts.org/thenethe.htm

    **********************************************************************

    Suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism
    Center

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed, and how to write OPEDs for
    publication as the members of our Drug Policy Writers Group
    http://mapinc.org/resource/dpwg/ do.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    may learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Sr. Editor www.drugnews.org.

  • Focus Alerts

    #330 Please Act To Protect Rainbow Family And Your Rights

    Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006
    Subject: #330 Please Act To Protect Rainbow Family And Your Rights

    PLEASE ACT TO PROTECT RAINBOW FAMILY AND YOUR RIGHTS

    ******************** PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE ************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #330 – Monday, 26 June 2006

    Don E Wirtshafter, Attorney at Law, a well known activist in the
    cannabis law reform community, has appealed for your assistance in a
    message below. Writing from the ‘Rainbow’ Gathering he has asked for
    our and your support. Please do whatever you can. Thank You!

    A Saturday article in the Denver Post, with pictures, is one of the
    latest press articles http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_3974355

    A good article written before the feds came down hard
    http://www.csindy.com/csindy/2006-06-22/cover.html

    The best Rainbow website http://www.welcomehome.org

    **********************************************************************

    Dear Friends and Family,

    I need your help to protect my “family,” the collective efforts of
    tens of thousands of citizens known as the “Rainbow Family.” This
    week, near Steamboat Springs, Colorado, the U.S. Forest Service has
    taken illegal action to stop this annual assembly for expression and
    prayer, in gross violation of the participants’ essential
    Constitutional rights.

    The ‘Rainbow’ Gatherings have borne a legacy of spiritual & cultural
    pilgrimage to the National Forests since 1972, the purest exercise of
    open consensual assembly in our time. The annual ‘Gathering of the
    Tribes’ draws thousands over the first week of July, focusing on the
    4th as a holy day of prayer for peace and freedom. In recent years
    small regional events in this mode have emerged, and such gatherings
    have taken place in many nations around the world.

    THE GATHERING EXPERIENCE

    Some say the “Rainbow” Gathering is the continuation of the idealism
    of Woodstock. I think of it more as my annual spiritual retreat and
    family reunion. Since 1980, I have gathered with my family to compare
    ideas and pray for peace. I arrive loaded with the burdens of my
    work, depressed about the world situation. Each year I depart with my
    faith in humankind renewed and with the energy to fight the beast
    another year.

    The rainbow family is not organized in any way; it is an exercise in
    self-determination and cooperation in the public interest, without
    need of government controls. We understand that no matter what comes
    down, it is the respect and care for each other that win in the end.
    We have no leaders or leadership, we have no offices or officers, we
    have no treasurer or treasury. We sit in counsel, often for days at a
    time in order to make mutual decisions, but there is no power to
    enforce these decisions on any individual. In the end, just like in
    society, it works because enough responsible people make sure that
    what needs to be done gets done.

    We have been doing rainbow gatherings for over 30 years, each time in
    a different national forest across the country. We come in and set up
    a village in the woods. Cooperative kitchens pour out a wide variety
    of foods. Seminars on just about any topic are run by the hour. The
    Rainbow is known as a healing gathering; people with various ailments
    come for help. Here in one place they can receive healing, from
    herbalists, acupuncturists, chiropractors and masseuses working with
    osteopaths and physicians. These healers work as a team and share
    their knowledge in a holistic approach that teaches all involved a lot
    about the roots of medicine.

    Religious groups, ranging from Christians to Hare Krishnas set up
    camps. It’s truly a free society. We go pretty far back in the woods
    to get away from the ills of civilization like alcohol and hard drugs.
    We have our gathering and then restore any damage we cause to the
    woods. And we have a perfect record of restoration of the forest.

    It’s great to walk through a gathering and see so many people but not
    a scrap of paper on the ground, not a cigarette butt in sight. Each
    year we train thousands of newcomers how to get along in the woods
    without destroying the place. Knowledgeable Forest Servide ‘Resource’
    personnel love us; it’s the Federal bureaucrats and police from
    Washington who are on our case.

    REPRESSIVE FEDERAL POLICIES

    The Bush Administration has spent millions of dollars trying to stop
    the Rainbow Gatherings. They are enforcing a ‘Noncommercial Group
    Use’ permit regulation that is impossible for unaffiliated individuals
    to comply with. 36 CFR 251.54 They require that that someone sign as
    an agent for a fictional group entity named as permit Holder — which
    then must assume full liability from the Government and bind
    participants vicariously to its terms.

    By the creed of the gatherings, no one can appoint themselves to such
    a position. More importantly, such an ad hoc gathering has no legal
    capacity to designate agents or act as a group party in any way. As a
    result, individuals are denied personal standing in First Amendment
    exercise and subjected to harsh criminal prosecution for being
    anywhere near the area.

    The Forest Service requires that a permit be applied for in advance of
    the gathering. And they use any excuse possible to deny a permit
    application when we manage to submit one. This year their denial was
    based on the fact that a logging company had a permit to log in a
    nearby parcel of the national forest, even though there is no logging
    activity present whatsoever. The site is far remote from any
    inhabitants — but still the Forest Service is all over our case.

    Millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent to block this harmless
    gathering from taking place. The scariest aspect of all this is how
    Homeland Security is using these gatherings to perfect their
    techniques of martial law. Regulations written for the Federal
    Emergency Management Authority to deal with natural disasters are now
    being used to crush dissent in this country.

    Each year the Rainbow Gathering is declared a “National Incident” and
    federal military law ensues. A Special Agent is appointed “Incident
    Commander”, with a Delegation of Authority, a large law enforcement
    “Team”, and huge budget to control the gathering. Qualified Forest
    Service administrators lose their power, while the county sheriff and
    other officials are brought into targeted law enforcement actions by
    inclusion in the Incident Team and other inter-agency agreements. Each
    year Homeland Security gains more power over the individuals involved.

    RIGHTS CRISIS IN COLORADO

    At this writing Forest Service law enforcement has issued over 500
    tickets to the early arrivals at the gathering in Colorado. They have
    blocked the road and have prevented food and water from reaching those
    who managed to get into the gathering before the police roadblock was
    set up.

    The 500 people with tickets are being herded into trials like none
    anyone has seen before in America. These pseudo trials are prototypes
    for what Homeland Security will use in the cases of insurrection or
    even a plague. Defendants lose the right to a public hearing (this
    year these hearings are being held behind closed doors in a firehouse
    garage near the site.

    Attorneys and legal observers have been denied the right to even view
    these trials. The defendants are not explained their rights nor
    afforded the right to an attorney, the right to summon witnesses, the
    right to a jury trial, etc. Defendants ordered to appear each day at
    9:00 a.m. and sit in the hot sun without water or sanitary facilities
    until their trials. Some have now been waiting for several days.
    These abbreviated trials only take a few minutes. Last year I tried
    to help a string of defendants defend themselves in these “trials” but
    felt helpless to do much as the system was clearly stacked against
    them.

    This year is especially frustrating to me as I have to watch this come
    down from 6000 miles away. Right now I am in Hungary at a medical
    conference for my employment. I am flying home on Thursday and plan
    on being in court Saturday, July 1st, to defend some of my best
    friends who got a ticket for “illegally gathering” as they drove down
    a public highway.

    WHAT TO DO

    The confrontation this year is getting more intense by the minute,
    which is why I am asking for your help. The only way to stop a
    massive conflagration in Colorado in the next few days is to get
    thousands of people to contact their political representatives as well
    as the responsible administrators at the Forest Service to demand that
    this repression stop immediately.

    Please, even if you can never conceive of yourself at a Rainbow
    Gathering, you must understand that if these citizens lose their
    constitutional right to gather, we all lose such rights. This year
    the Rainbow Gathering is being used to set precedents that will be
    turned against drug policy, civil liberty, anti-war or other activists
    in the near future.

    Following are some instructions on who to write and/or call We hope to
    start flooding the Department of Agriculture and the Forest Service
    with complaints starting Monday morning and not stopping until
    harassment stops. It is especially important that we get a few
    Congressional representative and Senators concerned enough to write
    the Forest Service for an explanation of why so much money is being
    spent to keep people from camping in the National Forest set aside for
    exactly that purpose.

    Please keep the pressure on these bureaucrats until we are able to
    spread the word that the government has backed off and that the
    gathering can proceed unhindered.

    If you do not know the contact information for your Congressman or
    Senator, you can find this here http://www.house.gov/ . You can call
    your representative at 212-224-3121. Besides your representatives in
    Washington, please call and write the following people to voice your
    protest to this harsh treatment of people who just want to go on a
    camping trip in the woods. Keep the calls coming until word is passed
    around that the government has called off their dogs. Please forward
    this letter to your friends and feel free to re-post it on any
    listserv or website you wish.

    Don E Wirtshafter

    **********************************************************************

    Please Contact As Many of the Following As Possible

    USDA, Natural Resources & Environment

    Mark Rey, USDA Undersecretary

    1400 Independence Ave. SW, # 217-E, Washington, DC 20250

    Tel 202-720-7173 Fax 202-720-0632

    [email protected]

    ——–

    Kathleen Gause, Director 202-205-8534

    USDA Forest Service Civil Rights Staff, Stop Code 1142, 1400
    Independence Ave., S.W., Washington., DC 20250-1142

    Tel 202-205-1585

    ——–

    Office of the Chief

    Dale Bosworth, Chief

    USDA Forest Service, Yates Federal Building (4NW Yates), 201 14th
    Street, SW, Washington, DC 20250

    Tel 202-205-1661 Fax 202-205-1765

    Executive Assistant, Karla Hawley, Tel 202-205-1195

    ——–

    Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests

    Mary H. Peterson, Supervisor

    2468 Jackson Street, Laramie, WY 82070-6535

    Tel 307-745-2300 Fax 307-745-2398

    ——–

    U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region (R-2)

    Rick Cables, Regional Forester

    P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, CO 80225-0127

    Tel 303-275-5451

    Richard Stem, Deputy Regional Forester, Resources Tel 303-275-5451

    Steve Silverman, Office of General Counsel, Regional Attorney Tel
    303-275-5536

    Bill Fox, Law Enforcement & Investigations, Special Agent in Charge
    Tel 303-275-5253

    Jerome Romero, Deputy Director of Civil Rights Tel
    303-275-5340

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT ACTIONS YOU TOOK

    Please report your action to the sent letter list ([email protected])
    if you are subscribed, or by E-mailing a copy directly to
    [email protected] if you are not subscribed.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake for DrugSense =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #329 Your Letters To The Editor Are Important

    Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006
    Subject: #329 Your Letters To The Editor Are Important

    YOUR LETTERS TO THE EDITOR ARE IMPORTANT

    ******************** PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE ************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #329 – Saturday, 24 June 2006

    Every day newspapers print items on their editorial pages worthy of
    your response by sending the paper a letter for publication.

    You see the items as shown at this link, and many of you do respond by
    sending the editors letters. http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm

    Today we call your attention to an OPED, below, printed in today’s
    Washington Post on page A21. The OPED was written by Eric E. Sterling,
    President of the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation
    http://www.cjpf.org and Julie Stewart, President of Families Against
    Mandatory Minimums http://www.famm.org

    Please consider sending a letter to the Washington Post in response to
    the OPED at their email address

    [email protected]

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    UNDO THIS LEGACY OF LEN BIAS’S DEATH

    When Len Bias, the basketball star, overdosed on cocaine 20 years ago,
    Len Bias, the symbol, was born. To many he symbolized the corruption
    of college athletics — stars whose academic performance is poor, if
    not irrelevant, but who are essential to bringing in donations and
    other revenue. To others, he became the object lesson: Cocaine is
    dangerous, don’t do it, you can die. For yet others, Bias symbolizes
    the danger that arises when a powerful symbol overwhelms careful
    judgment about what ought to be the law.

    Immediately after Bias’s death, the speaker of the House of
    Representatives, Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill Jr., from the Boston area
    (where Bias had just signed with the Celtics), issued a demand to his
    fellow Democrats for anti-drug legislation. Senior congressional
    staffers began meeting regularly in the speaker’s conference room as
    practically every committee in the House wrote Len Bias-inspired
    legislation attacking the drug problem. News conferences around the
    Capitol featured members of Congress extolling their efforts to clamp
    down on cocaine and crack.

    One result was the innocuous-sounding Narcotics Penalties and
    Enforcement Act, which became the first element of the enormous
    Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, hurried to the floor a little over two
    months after Bias’s death. But the effect of the penalties and
    enforcement legislation was to put back into federal law the kind of
    clumsy mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses that had been
    done away with 16 years before. And there they remain, 20 years and
    several hundred thousand defendants later.

    Congress wanted to send several messages by again enacting mandatory
    minimums: to the Justice Department to be more focused on high-level
    traffickers; to major traffickers that the new penalties would destroy
    them; to the voters that members of Congress could fight crime as
    vigorously as the police and prosecutors. But Congress garbled the
    message. Instead of targeting large-scale traffickers, it established
    low-level drug quantities to trigger lengthy mandatory minimum prison
    terms: five grams (the weight of five packets of artificial
    sweetener), 50 grams (the weight of a candy bar), 500 grams (the
    weight of two cups of sugar) or 5,000 grams (the weight of a lunchbox
    of cocaine). Large-scale traffickers organize shipments of drugs
    totaling tons — many millions of grams — filling tractor-trailers,
    airplanes and fishing boats.

    The Justice Department has compounded the problem by focusing on
    countless low-level offenders. The U.S. Sentencing Commission reports
    that only 15 percent of federal cocaine traffickers can be classified
    as high-level. Seventy percent are low-level. One-third of all federal
    cocaine cases involve an average of 52 grams, a candy bar-sized
    quantity of cocaine, resulting in an average sentence of almost nine
    years in prison without parole.

    Not surprisingly, the federal prison population has exploded. From
    1954 to 1976, it fluctuated between 20,000 and 24,000. By 1986 it had
    grown to 36,000. Today it exceeds 190,000 prisoners, up 527 percent in
    20 years. More than half this population is made up of drug offenders,
    most of whom are serving sentences created in the weeks after Len Bias
    died.

    Sadly, the nation’s drug abuse situation is not much better after 20
    years. Teenagers are using very dangerous drugs at twice the rate they
    did in the 1980s. The price of cocaine is much lower and the purity
    much higher, which tells us that the traffickers have become more efficient.

    There is a trickle of hope that mandatory sentences as a legacy of
    Bias’s death might come to an end. A handful of conservative members
    of the House Judiciary Committee have begun to question the wisdom of
    current mandatory minimum sentencing laws, and some vote against them.
    The first round of mandatory minimums for drug offenses, enacted in
    1951, was repealed almost 20 years later, with bipartisan support.
    Among those who backed repeal was George H.W. Bush, then a congressman
    from Texas. With his son in the White House, this would be a good time
    for history to repeat itself, and for this sad legacy of Len Bias’s
    death to finally end.

    Eric E. Sterling, counsel to the House Judiciary Committee from 1979
    to 1989, is president of the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation. Julie
    Stewart is president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums.

    **********************************************************************

    Suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism
    Center

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed, and how to write OPEDs for
    publication as the members of our Drug Policy Writers Group
    http://mapinc.org/resource/dpwg/ do.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, http://www.drugnews.org =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #328 The Spin Doctors Spit On Science

    Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006
    Subject: #328 The Spin Doctors Spit On Science

    THE SPIN DOCTORS SPIT ON SCIENCE

    ******************** PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE ************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #328 – Tue, 25 April 2006

    Last Thursday the Food and Drug Administration distributed a press
    release “Inter-Agency Advisory Regarding Claims That Smoked Marijuana
    Is a Medicine” which you may read at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01362.html

    The reaction in the press has been interesting, and worthy of your
    letters to the editors. Below we have listed links to a collection of
    the press responses as of today, Tuesday morning.

    If you need facts to support your letters we suggest these
    webpages:

    http://www.mpp.org/medical/ Please note the Common Questions about
    Medical Marijuana (answered by the Institute of Medicine)

    and

    http://www.drugwarfacts.org/medicalm.htm

    One of the editorials says “If the FDA won’t listen to the scientists,
    Congress should take steps to see that it does.” Please contact your
    members of Congress and ask them to take those steps.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    Published Friday, 21 April 2006

    New York Times F.D.A Dismisses Medical Benefit From Marijuana URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n495/a01.html

    San Francisco Chronicle FDA’s Missive Against Medical Pot URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n495/a10.html

    Island Packet (SC) FDA Rejects Marijuana for Medical Uses URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n495/a09.html

    Seattle Post-Intelligencer FDA Rejects Medicinal Use of Marijuana URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n495/a08.html

    Salt Lake Tribune FDA Says Marijuana Has No Medicinal Value URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n497/a05.html

    Chicago Tribune FDA Declares Marijuana Has No Medical Value URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n497/a04.html

    Watertown Daily Times (NY) FDA Says Pot Not Medicine URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n499/a07.html

    Arizona Republic Rebuffing Scientists, FDA Says Marijuana Has No
    Medical Value URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n500/a03.html

    Philadelphia Inquirer FDA: No Benefit in Medical Marijuana URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n500/a04.html

    Indianapolis Star FDA Says Marijuana Has No Medicinal Value URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n506/a07.html

    Oakland Tribune FDA Says No Studies Support Marijuana for Medicinal
    Use URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n508/a08.html

    Spartanburg Herald Journal (SC) FDA Dismisses Medical Benefit From
    Marijuana URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n508/a07.html

    Atlanta Journal-Constitution Marijuana Useless As Medicine, FDA Says
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a01.html

    Gainesville Sun (FL) F.D.A. Dismisses Medical Benefit From Marijuana
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a03.html

    Detroit News FDA: No Sound ‘Proof’ For Medical Marijuana URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a07.html

    The Register-Guard (OR) FDA Joins Opponents of Medicinal Pot URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n514.a07.html

    Published Saturday, 22 April 2006

    New York Times F.D.A.’s Report Illuminates Wide Divide on Marijuana
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n500/a02.html

    New York Times
    Editorial: The Politics of Pot
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n500/a01.html

    Seattle Times Marijuana Has No Medical Use, FDA Says URL:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n500/a05.html

    Gadsden Times (AL) FDA’s Report Illuminates Wide Divide on Marijuana
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n507/a02.html

    Gainesville Sun (FL) F.D.A.’s Report Illuminates Wide Divide on
    Marijuana URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a02.html

    Published Sunday, 23 April 2006

    Chicago Tribune
    Editorial: Dissembling On Medical Pot
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n506/a03.html

    The Oregonian
    Column: In The Bush Administration, The Spin Doctors Spit on Science
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a05.html

    Published Monday, 24 April 2006

    International Herald-Tribune
    Editorial: The Politics of Pot
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a06.html

    Clayton News Daily (Jonesboro, GA)
    Column: FDA Marijuana Stance Good for Anti-Drug Movement
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n509/a08.html

    Los Angeles Daily News
    Editorial: See No Evil
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n513.a07.html

    News Journal (DE)
    Editorial: FDA’s Credibility Goes Up in Smoke by Mixing Pot and Politics
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n513/a08.html

    Honolulu Star-Bulletin
    Editorial: FDA Loses Credibility With Jab At Medical Pot
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n514.a03.html

    The Republican (Springfield, MA)
    Editorial: Marijuana Research? Don’t Hold Your Breath
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n515/a06.html

    The Oracle (U of South FL) OPED: Medical Marijuana Is Nothing to Huff
    and Puff About URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a08.html

    Published Tuesday, 25 April 2006

    New York Times
    Column: Potheads and Sudafed
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a04.html

    Rocky Mountain News (Denver)
    Column: Follow the Drug War Money
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a05.html

    St. Paul Pioneer Press
    Column: Twisting Science to Serve Political Ideology
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a06.html

    Minnesota Daily (U of MN, Minneapolis)
    Editorial: FDA Says No to Medicinal Weed
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a07.html

    Tracy Press (CA)
    Editorial: Blowing Smoke at the White House
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n516.a09.html

    The Journal Times (Racine, WI)
    Editorial: FDA Ignores Science In Marijuana Holding
    URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06.n517.a01.html

    Additional news clippings on this issue may be found at this link as
    they are MAP archived:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Food+and+Drug+Administration

    **********************************************************************

    Suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism
    Center

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP Media Activism Facilitator Steve Heath for personal
    tips on how to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, http://www.drugnews.org