• Focus Alerts

    #297 Raich – A LTE Writing Opportunity

    Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004
    Subject: #297 Raich – A LTE Writing Opportunity

    RAICH – A LTE WRITING OPPORTUNITY

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #297 Thursday, 2 Dec 2004

    Seldom have we seen as much press as the coverage of the Supreme Court
    hearing on Raich v. Ashcroft last Monday. We suspect that it is a rare
    newspaper that has not printed something.

    Thus you have an opportunity to write letters on the subject not only
    to newspapers for which MAP has archived clippings, but also to your
    local newspapers.

    We will not suggest what you should write because we know so many of
    you are skilled letter writers. However, you may wish to include one
    of these points.

    (1) Many news clippings indicated that the court decision could strike
    down the current medical cannabis laws at the state and local level.
    This is simply not true. An example of a good already published letter
    on this is at http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1715/a05.html

    (2) A few clippings on the Raich case indicate that more than one
    judge appears to think going to the DEA or FDA to reschedule cannabis
    is the proper approach. This process is ongoing, has passed through
    the DEA to HHS and is presently under review. But the media seems to
    not be aware of the rescheduling effort. See http://www.drugscience.org/

    The majority of the MAP archived news clippings that could be targets
    for letters may be found at http://www.mapinc.org/people/Angel+Raich –
    and a few that link may miss are at http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm

    You may wish to check the above links frequently as new news and
    opinion clippings continue to be added to the MAP archives.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing letters to the editor are
    at:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, MAP’s Senior Editor

    = Please help us help reform. Send drug-related news to
    [email protected]

  • Focus Alerts

    #296 D.E.A. Dictates Doctor Confusion

    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004
    Subject: #296 D.E.A. Dictates Doctor Confusion

    D.E.A. DICTATES DOCTOR CONFUSION

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #296 Monday, 25 Oct 2004

    This past week, the Drug Enforcement Administration removed from its
    website a document titled ‘PRESCRIPTION PAIN MEDICATIONS: Frequently
    Asked Questions and Answers for Health Care Professionals and Law
    Enforcement Personnel.’ saying it contained misstatements. See
    http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/faq/pain_meds_faqs.htm

    While most websites have removed the document, a web search today
    still finds copies, like the one at http://headaches.about.com/library/meds/pain_meds_faqs.pdf

    Pain control advocates blasted the move, saying the document was
    needed guidance for physicians who feared prosecution in prescribing
    the powerful drugs.

    The dispute is the latest chapter in a long running battle between
    groups that promote appropriate use of pain medication and the DEA.

    Effective medical pain treatment SHOULD be a human right. In fact,
    allowing people to suffer pain untreated is equal in many ways to
    physical torture. Under treatment of pain is a fact and the DEA owns
    much of the responsibility for it.

    Decisions on proper levels of pain medications should be a private
    matter between patients and their physicians. Leaving the DEA as
    final arbiter of the line where responsible use ends and illegal
    diversion begins is a bad idea. Even when such guidelines exist — as
    they did for a few days until the DEA removed them from their website
    — the idea that law enforcement should be making medical decisions is
    ludicrous.

    Please consider writing a letter to the editor of the Washington Post,
    and to your local newspapers. The problems caused by the DEA and law
    enforcement for pain specialists and their patients has had much press
    over the past months. Thus a letter about the short lived DEA
    guidelines may be well received by any newspaper. You may find letter
    to the editor contacts for your local newspapers at:
    http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm

    Many chronic pain related news clippings may be found at this link
    http://www.mapinc.org/find?232

    If you support a defined set of guidelines, express your demand that
    the DEA produce such a list immediately so as to reduce doctor
    confusion and to lower the chances that either a patient or doctor
    will be unduly charged as drug criminals. If you believe the DEA
    should not have such overall power to intrude on doctor/patient
    relationships using pre-set guidelines, express your demand that the
    DEA desist from charging either doctors or patients as drug criminals
    without first having direct evidence of illegal diversion by one or
    both parties.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    The Washington Post article:

    Pubdate: Thu, 21 Oct 2004
    Source: Washington Post (DC)
    Copyright: 2004 The Washington Post Company
    Contact: [email protected]
    Author: Marc Kaufman

    DEA WITHDRAWS ITS SUPPORT OF GUIDELINES ON PAINKILLERS

    The Drug Enforcement Administration has reversed its support for a set
    of negotiated guidelines designed to end a controversy over the
    arrests of hundreds of pain specialists who prescribed powerful
    narcotics for their patients. The agency took the document off its
    Web site earlier this month, less than two months after announcing it
    with great fanfare.

    In rescinding its endorsement, the DEA wrote on its Web site that the
    31-page document “contained misstatements” and “was not approved as an
    official statement of the agency.” The agency declined to give any
    more specifics, saying that it hoped to issue a statement “in one or
    two weeks.”

    Worried doctors who had worked on crafting the “consensus” document —
    written over the past year by DEA officials and prominent pain
    management specialists — criticized the agency’s unannounced decision
    to disavow it. They said they were given no explanation or told
    whether the agency had changed its position on the contentious
    question of when and how doctors can prescribe the popular painkillers
    without risking prosecution.

    Advocates for aggressive pain management said the DEA’s decision
    appears to have been triggered when defense lawyers tried to introduce
    the guidelines in the upcoming drug-trafficking trial of William
    Hurwitz, a McLean physician.

    In late September, Hurwitz’s defense team sought to introduce them as
    evidence. Several weeks later, the DEA took the document off its Web
    site and said it was not official policy.

    Twelve days after that, U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty, who is
    prosecuting Hurwitz, filed a motion in the case asking that the
    guidelines be excluded as evidence, again saying that they do “not
    have the force and effect of law.”

    “It seems pretty clear that they felt they had to try to get rid of
    the guidelines because they supported so many parts of our case,” said
    Hurwitz’s defense attorney, Patrick Hallinan. “If the Justice
    Department followed the guidelines, there would be no reason to arrest
    and charge Dr. Hurwitz.” The case is scheduled for trial Nov. 3.

    DEA spokesman Ed Childress said the agency intends to rework the
    guidelines and publish them again. He said he could not comment on
    whether the decision to remove them had anything to do with any legal
    case.

    The guidelines, which were published in August in the form of a
    “Frequently Asked Questions” feature prominently displayed on the DEA
    Web site, were described at the time as an effort to codify the
    “balance” that both the DEA and the pain management community have
    long said they are seeking.

    The DEA has complained in the past that irresponsible, and possibly
    criminal, doctors prescribed narcotic painkillers too frequently and
    without enough care — letting the valuable drugs get into the hands
    of people who sell them, abuse them and sometimes are harmed by them.

    But many pain specialists have watched with dismay as scores of
    colleagues were arrested on criminal charges based on what many
    believe was at worst negligent or sloppy prescribing practices. Many
    of the cases triggered mandatory sentencing guidelines that can send
    convicted drug dealers to prison for decades.

    The introduction of long-lasting prescription opioids such as
    OxyContin revolutionized the treatment of pain, which doctors say is
    greatly under-treated in the United States.

    Researchers say a small percentage of patients become addicted, but
    most people in pain do not. However, OxyContin and other powerful
    drugs became popular with drug abusers in the late 1990s, especially
    in rural and southern areas, and it has been linked to numerous
    hospitalizations and some deaths.

    The consensus document was the product of more than a year of work by
    Russell K. Portenoy, a leading pain expert with New York’s Beth
    Israel Medical Center, University of Wisconsin pain specialist David
    E. Joranson, professionals involved in the care of dying patients,
    and two top officials of the DEA.

    When the guidelines were made public, DEA Administrator Karen P. Tandy
    embraced them and said in a statement: “The medical and law
    enforcement communities continue to work together to carefully balance
    the needs of legitimate patients for pain medications against the
    equally compelling need to protect the public from the risk of
    addiction and even possible death from these medications. . . .
    The DEA is committed to assisting the overwhelming majority of health
    care providers who successfully strike that balance every day, as well
    as the law enforcement officers investigating diversion and abuse of
    pain medications.”

    Portenoy said the group worked closely with the DEA, responding to
    many of its concerns and revising drafts many times to accommodate the
    agency. Portenoy said agency officials were active in the entire
    process, and he said he strongly believed that there had been
    “complete buy-in from the upper echelon” of the DEA regarding the guidelines.

    Since word went out the guidelines had been withdrawn, he has received
    many calls and e-mails from worried and upset doctors, Portenoy said.

    “There was a real feeling that we had made significant progress, but
    now we have to wonder whether that progress is all gone,” Portenoy
    said. “If they don’t fix whatever problems they might have and put
    the document back up, that would speak very clearly that the goal of
    the DEA is not to collaborate with the medical community or to
    reassure doctors about the proper role and use of prescription opioids
    in pain management.”

    The guidelines were also on many Web sites for pain clinics and
    programs. The DEA called at least one of them, the Pain & Policy
    Studies Group of the University of Wisconsin, and asked it to remove
    the document.

    **********************************************************************

    SAMPLE LETTER

    Note: This is a sample only. Please write your own letter! Newspaper
    editors are well aware attempts to have many people send them form letters
    for publication, and reject those attempts. See, for example, this article
    on letter writing published yesterday:
    http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/editorial/1098533049109381.xml

    ——

    The Drug Enforcement Administration continues to delay the release of
    guidelines for use by medical doctors who prescribe pain medications.
    Every day that passes without those guidelines being well-defined and
    available to all MDs is another day that doctors are put at risk of
    being arrested by DEA agents and charged with one or more drug crimes.
    Without well defined rules for prescribing opiates, such arrests can
    occur even though the doctor is following established medical
    procedures and has no intent to either over-prescribe pain medicine or
    to see them be illegally diverted to unqualified users.

    Considering the harsh and punitive legal sanctions that can be levied
    against any American convicted of a federal drug crime, not having an
    accepted set of federal guidelines from the DEA also puts patients’
    legitimate medical needs at risk. Doctors confused by constantly
    changing and/or non-existent federal rules will likely lean to
    minimizing dosage levels in order to protect their own liberty even
    when they might know the patient could benefit from a different level
    of care.

    It’s time for the DEA to settle the confusion for all concerned. If
    they continue to delay, the health of patients and the liberty of both
    patients and doctors are both at undue risk.

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form do

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Stephen Heath, MAP Media Activism Facilitator

    = Please help us help reform. Send drug-related news to
    [email protected]

  • Focus Alerts

    #295 Please Support Oregon’s Measure 33

    Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004
    Subject: #295 Please Support Oregon’s Measure 33

    PLEASE SUPPORT OREGON’S MEASURE 33

    **********************************************************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #295 Saturday, 16 Oct 2004

    Dear Reformers:

    Maybe you already know this – Oregon has Measure 33 on the ballot and
    it is going to be a tight contest. Polls are close, TV ads just
    starting, and every household has received a copy of the state’s
    Voter’s Pamphlet.

    To see Voter’s Pamphlet arguments go to:

    http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov22004/guide/meas/m33.html

    Supporters of Yes on 33 are asking Letter to the Editor writers to
    please send letters to Oregon newspapers from everywhere in support of
    the measure. Time is short. Letters need to be sent within the next
    few days. The more letters sent, printed or not, the more likely
    Oregon newspapers are to focus on the issue.

    Since the ballot measures in Oregon are a hot topic for every
    newspaper it is not necessary that your letters be tied to any
    specific item in a newspaper.

    But, please, focus on the advantages of the measure. Now is not the
    time to get into other reform issues – please, please wait until after
    the election if you wish to focus on other reform issues.

    Facts for your letters are found at: http://www.yeson33.org/

    Marijuana is safe medicine and patients need safe access.

    Measure 33 strengthens the current program.

    THANKS for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    SELECTING TARGET NEWSPAPERS

    You may obtain a list of Oregon newspapers, complete with letter email
    contacts or newspaper feedback webforms by going to this link and
    selecting Oregon in the Location dropdown and All Fields. You may even
    email yourself a copy for easy use:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/email.htm

    While letters need not be in response to anything a newspaper has
    printed, the latest news articles and opinion items from Oregon
    newspapers are at this link:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Measure+33

    **********************************************************************

    SAMPLE LETTER

    We are not including a sample letter in this Alert because we have
    confidence that most activists understand what needs to be said
    regarding Measure 33. However, we do suggest that if you are sending
    out a number of letters to multiple newspapers that you modify the
    wording with each letter. Rival newspaper editors do not like seeing
    the same exact letter print in different newspapers. Make each letter
    unique and in your own words for best overall results.

    Please send each letter one at a time directly to the newspaper.
    Please do not include other email address in what you send as this
    will cause the receiving newspaper to believe you are promoting a
    group effort, which will result in their discounting your letter.

    ALWAYS include your full name, address and a telephone contact so that
    the editors can verify your authorship. Most newspapers will not
    print a letter without this information.

    FINALLY, we suggest keeping your Word Count per letter to 200 or less
    – 150 words or less is even better for most papers. All newspaper
    editors appreciate brevity. Some newspapers have Word Count
    guidelines, so watch for that if you can read the actual paper or view
    its website.

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Stephen Heath, Media Activism Facilitator

    = Please help us help reform. Send drug-related news to
    [email protected]

  • Focus Alerts

    #294 Time To Decriminalize Marijuana In Chicago?

    Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004
    Subject: #294 Time To Decriminalize Marijuana In Chicago?

    TIME TO DECRIMINALIZE MARIJUANA IN CHICAGO?

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #294 Friday, 08 Oct 2004

    LATE LAST MONTH, the residents of Chicago were likely surprised to
    read the thoughts of Sergeant Tom Donegan, a veteran of the streets
    and someone who has intimate knowledge of how marijuana laws impact
    the community in the Windy City, America’s 3rd largest metropolitan
    center.

    In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, Donegan announced his
    interest in a plan for eliminating criminal court cases against adults
    found in possession of small amounts of marijuana. Startling
    statistics about how such cases are routinely handled in Cook County
    Criminal Court are now public knowledge.

    Over 7000 people are arrested each year by authorities and charged
    with possession of marijuana, yet only one percent ever see an actual
    criminal proceeding. This means that the thousands of man hours used
    by various police agencies in the Chicagoland area are in fact wasted
    since not only are the cases not prosecuted, but the enormous cost to
    taxpayers is likewise cast away with no return benefit to the community.

    Donegan suggests changing the law so that adults with small amounts of
    marijuana are issued a municipal citation and have a stiff fine levied
    against them. The result would be an unclogging of the criminal court
    docket which must process the voluminous paperwork related to a
    marijuana criminal arrest regardless of whether a case is actually
    heard.

    But the best outcome of such a plan would be the literal millions of
    dollars in fines generated. When this fresh revenue is combined with
    the massive savings that will come from no longer having police having
    to appear in thousands of court hearings on overtime pay rates, the
    city stands to benefit in a tremendous way financially with no
    associated increase in risk to overall public safety.

    The most astonishing aspect of the story was still to come. Unlike
    the common response given by political leaders to such suggestions
    from police – which by the way have been increasing steadily over the
    past decade as cops recognize the failed policies of a criminal
    Prohibition against casual adult marijuana use – Chicago Mayor Richard
    Daley has embraced the idea and is encouraging city legislators to
    consider making such a change as quickly as possible.

    THIS GROUND BREAKING STORY was picked up on the AP wire and has been
    printed in newspapers across the United States and Canada in the past
    two weeks. Please consider writing a letter to as many of these
    newspapers as possible with your comments of support for the proposed
    change in Chicago. When such a major city moves away from criminal
    prohibition and more towards a system of decriminalization, more
    cities and states are likely to soon follow.

    To find more recent news items about this story, please click this
    link:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Chicago

    Finally, this story is significant enough so that a short letter to
    the editor of your local newspapers telling what Chicago is doing and
    recommending the same for your city or state, if appropriate, could
    possibly be published – without any tie to a specific news item in a
    targeted newspaper.

    By using the Area dropdown at this link you may find the contact
    information for many of your state newspapers:

    http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Here is the version of the story which ran in the Chicago Sun-Times:

    Newshawk: http://www.illinoisnorml.org
    Pubdate: Sat, 25 Sep 2004
    Source: Chicago Sun-Times (IL)
    Copyright: 2004 The Sun-Times Co.
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.suntimes.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/81
    Author: Frank Main, Crime Reporter
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Chicago
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

    OFFICIALS TO WEIGH MERITS OF POT FINES

    On the heels of Mayor Daley’s endorsement of a plan to fine people
    caught with small amounts of marijuana, representatives of the Cook
    County state’s attorney’s office and the Chicago Police Department
    will meet next week about it.

    Police Sgt. Tom Donegan came up with the proposal out of frustration
    at seeing his misdemeanor marijuana cases get dismissed over and over.
    He gave the seven-page proposal to his bosses about two weeks ago.

    Mayor Daley embraced the idea Tuesday, saying “it’s decriminalized
    now” because most misdemeanor pot cases get tossed out. Donegan
    estimated fines could raise millions of dollars for city coffers.

    Of the 7,430 cases prosecuted in city branch courts in 2003 involving
    less than 2.5 grams of pot, 94 percent were dismissed, Donegan wrote,
    citing court records. He estimated the department spends $400 on
    officers’ salaries to process one pot arrest.

    And that does not take into account the costs of the clerk’s office to
    process the paperwork, the sheriff’s office to provide security in
    court, the state’s attorney’s costs for the prosecutor and the salary
    of the judge, Donegan said.

    “We plan to meet with the Chicago Police next week to discuss the pot
    issue. We are looking into the legality and constitutionality of
    this,” said John Gorman, spokesman for the state’s attorney’s office.

    Police spokesman Robert Cargie said “something is wrong” if officers
    spend two to four hours to process such pot cases and they are
    regularly tossed out.

    “Certainly the issue of successful prosecutions will be examined,”
    Cargie said. “There are some obvious problems that need some sort of
    solution.”

    **********************************************************************

    SAMPLE LETTER

    PLEASE NOTE: This is a sample letter only. Your own letter should be
    substantially different so that it will be considered adding to the
    discussion and not viewed as a SPAM letter writing campaign. Please
    limit your Word Count to 200 or less for best chance of being published.

    TO the editors of the (Newspaper Name):

    The news that Chicago Mayor Richard Daley is endorsing a proposal to
    end criminal charges against adults found in possession of small
    amounts of marijuana is ground breaking. Nationwide, police arrest
    more Americans for simple pot possession than for all violent crimes
    combined. The resulting pressure on criminal court dockets is enormous.

    Decriminalizing pot possession would save hundreds of thousands of
    otherwise law-abiding Americans from being given a lifetime criminal
    record. It would also save hundreds of thousands of police man-hours
    which could be more productively used investigating drunk driving,
    domestic violence, sexual crimes and corporate fraud to name a few
    other crimes which cause far more damage to our society than does the
    responsible use of marijuana by American adults.

    It would behoove the city of (community where this paper is printed)
    to give similar consideration to what is a more common sense and
    practical approach to dealing with the tens of millions of Americans
    who enjoy using marijuana responsibly and do not wish to be labeled as
    criminal threats to the community.

    Sincerely,

    Your name and contact info

    NOTE: You must include your address and phone number so the editors
    can verify you are the author of your letter.

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************
    TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

    Please utilize the following URLs

    http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

    http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

    We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, Newshawks and letter
    writing activists.

    NOTICE:

    In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
    distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
    interest in receiving the included information for research and
    educational purposes.

    REMINDER:

    Please help MAP find published news items. Details at
    http://www.mapinc.org/hawk.htm

    = Prepared by: Stephen Heath – MAP Media Activism Facilitator

    = Please help us help reform. Send drug-related news to
    [email protected]

  • Focus Alerts

    #293 TIME Scare Story On B.C. Bud Ignores Facts

    Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004
    Subject: #293 TIME Scare Story On B.C. Bud Ignores Facts

    TIME MAGAZINE SCARE STORY ON B.C. BUD IGNORES REAL FACTS

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #293 Tue, Aug. 17 2004

    The U.S. press continues to publish stories about marijuana based on
    two easily disprovable myths. The first myth is about super potent
    marijuana, and how it’s totally different from the lightweight stuff
    smoked by those hippies back in the sixties. The second myth involves
    allegedly lax Canadian laws, particularly in British Columbia, and how
    they are allowing the helpless U.S. to be flooded by superweed (or
    “the crack of marijuana,” as drug czar John Walters likes to call it).

    This week, Time Magazine picks up on both of the myths in one
    blatantly biased article. The article subtly acknowledges facts that
    undermine its own main premise. The author tells us that only 5
    percent of marijuana in the U.S. comes from Canada, yet “experts”
    repeatedly suggest that the U.S. is being overwhelmed with B.C. Bud.
    The author discusses variations between batches of marijuana, but
    implies that Canadian pot is somehow different and more scary than the
    domestic crop.

    The truth is that the U.S. is furious over Canada’s halting attempts
    at drug policy reform, including a bill to decriminalize marijuana.
    Even though the bill isn’t that great, the U.S. still can’t accept any
    moves away from zero tolerance. They don’t know how to respond other
    than by hyping discredited propaganda.

    Please write a letter to Time asking why the magazine reported a
    non-story with little basis in fact, and offer a few facts of your
    own.

    For more information on the myths, see:

    Drug War Facts on marijuana potency – http://www.drugwardistortions.org/distortion11.htm
    Dan Forbes on marijuana potency claims – http://slate.msn.com/?id74151
    Richard Cowan on BC Bud Myth – http://www.marijuananews.com/news.php3?sid=732

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Source: Time Magazine
    Contact: [email protected]

    PLEASE NOTE: Time Magazine only prints very short letters, usually
    less than 100 words. Try to be as concise as possible.

    **********************************************************************

    Pubdate: Mon, 23 Aug 2004
    Source: Time Magazine (US)
    Copyright: 2004 Time Inc
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.time.com/time/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/451
    Author: Anita Hamilton
    Note: Reported by Ben Bergman/Blaine, Laura Blue/New York, Chris
    Daniels/Toronto.
    Photo: (from the magazine by the Barrie Police Service) CASH CROP: Inside a
    former brewery in Ontario, police found this pot
    farm http://www.mapinc.org/images/bcbud420.jpg
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis – Canada)
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/BC+Bud
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?420 (Cannabis – Popular)
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/walters.htm (Walters, John)

    THIS BUD’S FOR THE U.S.

    Canada’s Relaxed Drug Laws May Be Fueling A Boom In Marijuana Exports To
    America.

    It was the bus driver who noticed something suspicious. According to
    school officials, a driver for Blaine High School in northwestern
    Washington State thought something was strange about students’
    carrying unusually full bags to school and then never taking them back
    home. He alerted U.S. authorities, who boarded the bus on the morning
    of Feb. 20 and allegedly found 8 lbs. of marijuana, valued at $25,000,
    hidden inside a teenage girl’s backpack. Prosecutors allege that the
    minor, 16, was getting paid $300 a trip to work as a drug mule for
    smugglers moving marijuana into the U.S. from Canada. The teen’s home,
    in Point Roberts, Wash., borders British Columbia in an area with
    relatively light border patrol, which would have made it easy for her
    to get the drugs from Canada before getting on the bus.

    Expelled from school and charged with possessing marijuana with intent
    to deliver, the girl has a hearing scheduled for Aug. 23 in
    Bellingham, Wash. Deputy prosecutor Thomas Verge has said he will
    probably ask for an exceptionally long sentence that would put the
    teen behind bars until her 21st birthday.

    The controversy has upset the community. “She was a wonderful young
    girl,” says her principal, Dan Newell. “I wouldn’t have ever thought
    that if anyone was going to haul marijuana across the border, it would
    be this lady.”

    Nor would anyone have thought that the cross-border traffic of illegal
    drugs would become one of the knottiest areas of disagreement between
    the U.S. and its northern neighbor.

    An estimated 880 to 2,200 tons of marijuana are grown in Canada,
    according to a new report from Canadian police.

    About 90% of the commercial crop winds up in the U.S., where its
    street value ranges from $5 billion to $25 billion.

    Although only 5% of pot in the U.S. comes from Canada, the trade is
    flourishing because of high demand in the U.S. and the comparatively
    mild punishments in Canada for growers and traffickers.

    The U.S. seized more than 48,000 lbs. of marijuana along the Canadian
    border last year, nearly double the 26,000 lbs. it retrieved in 2002,
    according to a U.S. State Department report.

    There have been seizures all along the border, in Montana, North
    Dakota, Michigan, Ohio and other states.

    Canadian pot has cachet in the U.S. because of its reputation for
    being especially potent. The featured brand is BC Bud – which is grown
    in British Columbia and has become synonymous with the high-grade
    marijuana grown throughout Canada. Once in the U.S., the pot is
    exchanged for cash, and sometimes cocaine or guns, which are then
    smuggled back to Canada.

    Although the actual potency of BC Bud varies from batch to batch,
    depending on how it’s grown, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
    says that as much as 25% of BC Bud is made of the psychoactive drug
    tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). In contrast, the pot that the hippie
    generation smoked in the 1970s had only 2% THC content, and most pot
    consumed in the U.S. today averages about 7% THC.

    White House drug czar John Walters blames BC Bud in part for the
    increased number of pot-related emergency room incidents, which have
    more than doubled, from 54,000 in 1996 to 119,000 in 2002. Those
    incidents range from accidents and injuries to unexpected reactions to
    the drug. “Canada is exporting to us the crack of marijuana,” Walters
    told reporters in April. Others dispute Walters’ claims. “Domestic
    American marijuana is probably a little bit better,” says Richard
    Stratton, editor in chief of High Times, a magazine that covers
    marijuana issues.

    But the BC Bud name is so well regarded that some dealers pass off
    other varieties as Canadian to fetch the $3,000-to-$10,000-per-lb.
    price.

    And BC Bud seems to be everywhere. “It’s hella easy to get,” says
    “Angelo,” 22, a Seattle resident who asked to be identified by a
    pseudonym. “You can usually go to [a convenience store] between 1:30
    a.m. and 3:30 a.m. and ask people who you think smoke bud,” he says.

    On the Canadian side, the drug is even more ubiquitous. At the popular
    New Amsterdam Cafe in downtown Vancouver, customers openly smoke
    marijuana. “People come with pot. We are a business, though, so we
    have a $2 minimum cafe charge [for snacks and drinks],” says cafe
    manager Scott Heardy. Inspector David Nelmes, who is in charge of
    drugs for the Vancouver police department, tells TIME, “I can’t
    remember the last time a member of the Vancouver police department
    arrested someone for smoking a joint. Frankly, who’s got time?” If
    passed within the year, as seems likely, new Canadian legislation
    would decriminalize possession of less than 15 grams of marijuana,
    meaning that offenders would be slapped with only the equivalent of a
    traffic ticket.

    That approach is a far cry from the one that is taken in U.S. states
    like Oklahoma, where a person caught smoking dope could get up to a
    year in prison, although probation is more common.

    Canada’s attitude toward small-scale toking up has led some U.S.
    officials to blame the northerners for the influx of BC Bud in
    America. “If the perception is that it will be easier to get marijuana
    in Canada … then it creates problems at the border,” Paul Cellucci,
    U.S. ambassador to Canada, said at a Toronto Board of Trade dinner in
    February. Indeed, the trade has led to an increase in drive-by
    shootings in Canada by rival dealers, and to “grow-rips,” in which
    competing clans break into growers’ houses to steal their crops,
    according to Canadian police.

    The body of the suspected ringleader of a trafficking group was found
    stabbed in the neck in a ditch in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, in November
    2002. “It’s still a dangerous drug,” says James Capra, the DEA’s chief
    of domestic operations. “People are killing each other over it.”

    Currently, a grower in Canada who has been convicted can expect less
    than two years of house arrest and a trafficker anywhere from three
    months to five years, served either at home or in prison, compared
    with the minimum punishment of five to 10 years that most convicted
    traffickers and growers receive in U.S. federal court.

    But as the violence has increased and cultivation of the crop has
    moved into residential areas, Canada has begun cracking down on its
    estimated 50,000 commercial pot growers.

    Over the past four years, police in Vancouver have seized $288 million
    worth of marijuana and $8.7 million worth of growing equipment.

    In Barrie, Ont., in January, police confiscated 30,000 marijuana
    plants, worth $23 million, inside a former Molson brewery.

    One hot, muggy morning in July, a TIME reporter accompanied the
    Vancouver police as an officer thumped on the door of a two-story
    brick-and-panel house on a leafy street of manicured lawns.

    Inside, officers discovered a basement filled wall to wall with more
    than 300 glossy female cannabis bushes. That bust is pretty routine,
    but the BC Bud keeps flowing.

    In the past four years, Vancouver police have made more than 1,500
    others, or about one a day.

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

    Please utilize the following URLs

    http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

    http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

    We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, Newshawks and letter
    writing activists.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Stephen Young, Focus Alert Specialist

  • Focus Alerts

    #292 Tell Congress To Protect Medical Marijuana Patients!

    Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004
    Subject: #292 Tell Congress To Protect Medical Marijuana Patients!

    TELL CONGRESS TO PROTECT MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS!

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #292 Thursday, 1 July 2004

    Next week, possibly as early as July 6th, there will be a historic
    vote in the U.S. House of Representatives. Below are the action alerts
    of leading organizations. Please act!

    **********************************************************************

    URGENT: Protect Medical Marijuana Patients

    The Ashcroft Justice Department continues to spend millions of dollars
    arresting cancer, AIDS, and MS patients who use medical marijuana –
    even in states where it is legal. Next week, Congress will vote on an
    amendment that would stop Ashcroft’s war on medical marijuana
    patients. We need you to fax your U.S. Representative today and urge
    them to support the amendment.

    ACTIONS TO TAKE

    1) Fax your Representative:

    http://actioncenter.drugpolicy.org/action/index.asp?step=2&item=19658&ms=hincheygeneral

    2) Forward this alert to your friends and family.

    MORE INFO

    Responding to growing conflict between the states and the federal
    government over the issue of medical marijuana, Rep. Hinchey (D-NY)
    and Rep. Rohrabacher (R-CA) will again offer an amendment to the
    Commerce-Jusitce-State spending bill that would prevent the U.S.
    Justice Department from undermining state efforts to provide
    terminally ill and chronic pain patients access to doctor-recommended
    medical marijuana. The amendment would prohibit the Justice Department
    from spending any money on arresting or prosecuting medical marijuana
    patients in states where medical marijuana is legal. 152 members of
    Congress voted for a similar amendment last year.

    Since 1996, 11 states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii,
    Maine, Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington) have adopted
    medical marijuana laws. The U.S. Justice Department, however,
    continues to spend millions of dollars arresting medical marijuana
    patients and their caregivers – even in states where medical marijuana
    is legal. At a time when violent drug cartels remain at large and
    threats of terrorism continue to emerge, it is irresponsible for the
    Justice Department to jeopardize public safety by wasting scarce law
    enforcement resources conducting raids on hospice centers and medical
    marijuana patients.

    The Hinchey-Rohrabacher medical marijuana amendment would not prevent
    the Justice Department from arresting people using, growing, or
    selling marijuana for recreational use. Nor would it prevent the
    Justice Department from arresting medical marijuana patients in the
    states that have not approved the drug for this use. It simply
    prevents the federal government from arresting cancer, AIDS and MS
    patients that use marijuana for medical reasons in states that have
    adopted medical marijuana laws.

    Substantial majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents
    support medical marijuana. A 2001 Pew Research Center poll found that
    73% of Americans support medical marijuana. A 2002 Time/CNN poll found
    that 80% of Americans support it. The Institute of Medicine has
    determined that nausea, appetite loss, pain and anxiety “all can be
    mitigated by marijuana.” Allowing cancer, AIDS, and MS patients legal
    access to medical marijuana is supported by the American Nurses
    Association, American Public Health Association, American Bar
    Association, the Whitman-Walker Clinic, and Kaiser Permanente, among
    other groups.

    **********************************************************************

    Tell Congress to Protect Medical Marijuana Patients!

    The time to contact your US Representative is now!
    Visit

    http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?list=type&type=69

    to send a letter telling Congress to Vote Yes to Protect Medical
    Marijuana Patients.

    Next week the U.S. House of Representatives will again consider the
    Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment, which would stop the federal
    prosecution of medical marijuana patients in states that have passed
    laws protecting them. Even if you have already contacted your member
    regarding this vote, please do so one more time.

    Last year the amendment got 152 votes of support. By contacting your
    representative today to ask for their support, you may help get the
    remaining votes this important bill needs.

    Congress knows this is important. The debate last year was emotional
    and personal. And with Vermont just passing a medical marijuana law
    and several other states considering it, the stakes for Congress are
    getting higher.

    Take a minute to send a letter. We have a pre-written letter you can
    send, or you can revise it as you wish. Your representative is in
    Congress to serve you, and your vote matters to them.

    Hilary McQuie Campaign Director Americans for Safe
    Access

    **********************************************************************

    Protect Medical Marijuana Patients

    The Ashcroft Justice Department continues to spend millions of dollars
    arresting cancer, AIDS, and MS patients who use medical marijuana –
    even in states where it is legal. Next week, Congress will vote on an
    amendment that would stop Ashcroft’s war on medical marijuana
    patients. We need you to fax your U.S. Representative today and urge
    them to support the amendment.

    ACTIONS TO TAKE

    1) E-mail your Representative:

    http://capwiz.com/norml2/mail/oneclick_compose/?alertid=5962431

    2) Forward this alert to your friends and family.

    **********************************************************************

    End the Federal Government’s Attacks on Medical Marijuana Patients and
    Providers

    Dear Friends:

    Significant progress has been made in protecting medical marijuana
    patients from arrest since Suzanne Pfeil, a paraplegic, was handcuffed
    to her bed by DEA agents who raided the Wo/Men’s Alliance for Medical
    Marijuana (WAMM) cooperative in Santa Cruz, California in 2002.
    Support in Congress for medical marijuana has been growing, and the
    federal courts have demonstrated a willingness to undermine and even
    nullify harsh federal laws.

    Unfortunately, the DEA continues to raid patients with serious
    illnesses, including AIDS, cancer, and multiple sclerosis … despite
    strong public support for medical marijuana, as evidenced by
    voter-passed initiatives in eight states and the District of Columbia,
    as well as national polls showing that 70-80 percent of Americans
    support medical marijuana access.

    It is time to end the federal interference in state medical marijuana
    laws once and for all. Last July, 152 members of the U.S. House of
    Representatives voted for the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment*, which
    would deny the U.S. Department of Justice funds to raid, arrest,
    prosecute, and imprison medical marijuana patients and providers. (See
    how your representative voted. http://www.mpp.org/house2003/ ) MPP is
    currently building grassroots support for the amendment so that a
    majority of U.S. representatives will vote for it this year.

    Your help is needed. Another vote will be taken this summer in the
    House, and your representative needs to hear from you now.

    Taking action is easy. Simply visit our take action page. By entering
    your name and address, the system will automatically prompt you to
    send an e-mail to your representative, tailored to how he or she voted
    last year.

    http://www.mpp.org/DD/action.html

    We appreciate your assistance and look forward to continuing to fight
    for you and with you in the future.

    Sincerely,

    Gary Reams
    National Outreach Coordinator
    Marijuana Policy Project

    * Language of the amendment (as proposed in July 2003): “None of the
    funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be
    used to prevent the States of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado,
    Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, or Washington from
    implementing State laws authorizing the use of medical marijuana in
    those States.”

    **********************************************************************

    Friends,

    There are groups of drug war cheerleaders who are actively seeking
    support of congress in opposition. For example, the Community
    Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA) – a private organization which
    receives considerable funding from the Office of National Drug Control
    Policy (ONDCP) and other government agencies – sent out the following
    to various supporters.

    They believe that the arrest and jailing of patients who use cannabis
    as medicine with the advice of their doctor is a good health outcome.

    Your tax dollars at work – against you. We know that you have the
    answers to counter the lies and spin in their statement:

    Oppose Amendment to Prohibit Enforcement of Federal Law Regarding
    Marijuana

    Background

    The House is scheduled to consider amendments and vote on its version
    of the Commerce, Justice, State, Judiciary and Related Agencies FY
    2005 Appropriations bill next Wednesday, July 7, 2004. Congressman
    Maurice Hinchey (D-22nd/NY) will again this year offer an amendment to
    prohibit the enforcement of Federal law pertaining to marijuana in
    States that have decriminalized the use of marijuana for so-called
    “medicinal” use.

    Last year the amendment was defeated 273 (against) – 152 (in favor),
    however if we are to be successful in defeating this amendment again,
    your Representative must hear from you that you do not support this
    amendment. To see a record of how your Representative voted last year,
    please go to http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2003/roll420.xml.

    It is imperative that your Representative hear from you about the
    importance of defeating this amendment in the FY 2005 Commerce,
    Justice, State, Judiciary and Related Agencies Appropriations bill.

    What you need to know [YES, CADCA really believes all of this
    stuff]

    Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in America—of the
    approximately 20 million current illicit drug users, 14.6 million (about
    75%) are using marijuana

    Of the 7.1 million Americans suffering from illegal drug dependence or
    abuse, 60% abuse or are dependent on marijuana

    More young people are now in treatment for marijuana dependency than
    for alcohol or for all other illegal drugs combined

    The FDA has not approved nor has it found any medicinal value in botanical
    marijuana, which is why it remains a Schedule I controlled substance.

    In a policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics stating
    their opposition to the legalization of marijuana, they state that
    “Any change in the legal status of marijuana, even if limited to
    adults, could effect the prevalence of use among adolescents.”

    **********************************************************************

    The above should be enough to encourage you to act. No need for the
    usual other actions we normally feature in our alerts, as we know you
    will do what you can in other action areas.

    ********************* Just DO It!! **********************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Focus Alert Specialist

  • Focus Alerts

    #291 Prisoner Abuse And The Drug War – What You Can Do

    Date: Fri, 14 May 2004
    Subject: #291 Prisoner Abuse And The Drug War – What You Can Do

    PRISONER ABUSE AND THE DRUG WAR – WHAT YOU CAN DO

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #291 Friday, 14 May 2004

    Very few in the media, or in Congress, are making the connection
    between the fact that prisoners in the United States suffer a degree
    of abuse no less inhumane than those in Iraq. There has been reports
    that several of the soldiers charged in Iraq received their training
    working in United States prisons.

    But there are hardly any news reports that tie prison abuse of our drug war
    prisoners to what happened in Iraq. See:

    http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm

    The current focus of the press on prisoner abuse in Iraq presents a
    superb opportunity for you to write letters to the editor pointing out
    how ironic it is that anybody is shocked over the photos, when our
    prisoners here at home are treated no better – to include our drug war
    prisoners.

    Need facts?

    The November Coalition has already set up a page of links to good
    reports at:

    http://www.november.org/abuse/media.html

    Note “Prisoner Abuse: Not in Bush’s America?” at the bottom of this page:

    http://www.november.org/abuse/

    For more facts see:

    http://www.drugwarfacts.org/civilrts.htm

    and

    http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

    **********************************************************************

    ACTIONS YOU CAN TAKE:

    Write a LTEs to the papers in your state about this issue. This is a
    good example of a topic that may result in a printed letter without
    the need to tie it to any other specific item the papers may have printed.

    To find your state/local newspapers, go to MAP’s media links page
    at:

    http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm

    Using the ‘List by Area” dropdown find and bring up the list of
    newspapers in your state and their LTE contact.

    Let your members of congress know about how you feel about this issue.
    If you can, visit with the members, or visit their state/local
    offices, as telling them or their staff directly always shows a deep
    concern, stronger than any other message. Or give them a phone call.

    Find the contracts for your representative at http://www.house.gov/

    And for your Senator at http://www.senate.gov/

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

    Please utilize the following URLs

    http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

    http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

    We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, Newshawks and letter
    writing activists.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Focus Alert Specialist

  • Focus Alerts

    #290 Your Tax Dollars At Work – Against You

    Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004
    Subject: #290 Your Tax Dollars At Work – Against You

    YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK – AGAINST YOU

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #290 Thursday, 29 April 2004

    Each day the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) spends
    about a half million dollars on advertising, advertising bought under
    a law that requires the ads be purchased at half the going price, so
    their actual market value is about a million dollars a day. See
    http://www.mapinc.org/lte/

    The majority of this advertising is spent on demonizing cannabis, and
    cannabis users. When either medical or recreational cannabis use
    becomes an issue – in legislatures or by ballot initiatives – within
    any state, these advertising dollars are focused on undermining the
    political debate within those states.

    To counter this advertising, the drug policy reform community – at
    best – is able to spend less than a million dollars a year on
    advertising.

    This is the primary reason all the reform organizations place such a
    great emphasis on having folks like you write Letters to the Editor of
    newspapers and magazines – which costs you only time but contributes
    to redressing the 360 to 1 imbalance in the advertising playing field.

    Not content with the clear imbalance against us, Congress has passed a
    law – the Istook Amendment – which will withhold federal funds from
    any public transit system that accepts ads that promote the
    legalization or medical use of cannabis, which is what the OPED below
    is about.

    The drug war cheerleaders at ONDCP and in congress now push censorship
    because they fear that public opinion is turning against them. Open
    and honest debate, public forums, your LTEs, and even advertising that
    does not agree with their opinion is to be feared.

    “Never doubt that a small, group of thoughtful, committed citizens can
    change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” –
    Margaret Mead (1901-78), American anthropologist, “Coming of Age in
    Samoa”

    Your letters to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution thanking them for
    printing the OPED will, even if not printed, let their editorial page
    editors, and their editorial board, know that printing the truth about
    this un-American government action is not popular.

    Need More Facts for Your Letters?

    Change the Climate’s ads are the direct reason for the Istook
    Amendment. See

    http://www.changetheclimate.org/campaigns/02_18_04/

    Other webpages about the efforts to overturn this amendment:

    http://www.aclu.org/DrugPolicy/DrugPolicy.cfm?ID=14974&c=19

    http://www.mpp.org/releases/nr042804wdc.html

    http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/02_28_04istook.cfm

    **********************************************************************

    ACTIONS YOU CAN TAKE:

    Write a LTEs to the papers in your state about this issue. This is a
    good example of a topic that may result in a printed letter without
    the need to tie it to any other specific item the papers may have printed.

    To find your state/local newspapers, go to MAP’s media links page
    at:

    http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm

    Using the ‘List by Area” dropdown find and bring up the list of
    newspapers in your state and their LTE contact. Note those with the
    higher numbers of Clippings or Excerpts as this tends to indicate a
    higher interest by the paper in our issues, and thus should be your
    first targets.

    Also consider sending the OPED to your local newspapers. Ask your
    papers to please print similar editorial page items exposing this
    attempt at government censorship.

    Let your members of congress know about how you feel about this issue.
    If you can, visit with the members, or visit their state/local
    offices, as telling them or their staff directly always shows a deep
    concern, stronger than any other message. Or give them a phone call.

    Last, but not least, cannabis is a topic before the legislators, or an
    initiative issue, in a number of states and cities. Please make the
    appropriate contacts for your states. It does not take many folks like you
    to make a real difference! See:

    http://actioncenter.drugpolicy.org/action/moreactions.asp

    http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/

    http://www.mpp.org/campaigns/index.html

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    The OPED:

    Pubdate: Thu, 29 Apr 2004
    Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution (GA)
    Copyright: 2004 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Contact: http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/letters/sendletter.html
    Author: Bill Piper

    MOVE TO PENALIZE PRO-DRUG VIEWS AMOUNTS TO CENSORSHIP

    In building his case for liberating Iraq, President Bush told Congress
    and the American people, “America will always stand firm for the
    non-negotiable demands of human dignity: the rule of law, limits on
    the power of the state, respect for women, private property, free
    speech, equal justice and religious tolerance.”

    These principles continue to comfort and motivate both our soldiers
    making the ultimate sacrifice for America and the Iraqi people
    struggling to build a free society of their own.

    Yet, at the very time our soldiers are risking their lives to bring
    democracy to Iraq, certain members of Congress are undermining it at
    home.

    This year, U.S. Rep. Ernest Istook (R-Okla.) slipped a provision into
    a federal spending bill that takes transportation grants away from any
    city that displays ads on its buses and subways from groups advocating
    “the legalization or medical use of” marijuana.

    The provision is already having a chilling effect on free speech.
    Afraid of losing at least $85 million in transportation funding, the
    Washington transportation authority rejected an advertisement this
    year submitted by a coalition of drug policy reform groups.

    The ad shows a group of ordinary people standing behind prison bars
    under the headline, “Marijuana Laws Waste Billions of Taxpayer Dollars
    to Lock Up Non-Violent Americans.”

    The goal of the Istook Amendment is to prevent residents from
    educating their neighbors on why we need to reform our nation’s
    marijuana laws.

    Of course, it won’t be long before other members of Congress try to
    censor viewpoints they disagree with. Abortion-rights groups could
    lobby Congress to ban anti-abortion ads and vice versa.

    This is censorship, plain and simple.

    With $3 billion in federal transportation dollars at stake, this is a
    serious issue. Courts have generally ruled that public transportation
    authorities cannot discriminate against any political viewpoint.

    If local and state transit authorities are forced to run drug policy
    reform ads, they could lose federal grants. Istook’s provision could
    end up costing cities in many congressional districts tens of millions
    of dollars. That means not only less service, but also fewer jobs.

    The same federal spending bill also gave the federal government $145
    million in taxpayer money to run ads in support of a war on marijuana,
    including ads on buses and subways around the country.

    At the same time members of Congress are spending taxpayer money to
    promote their view on an issue, they’re prohibiting taxpayers from
    using their own money to pay for ads offering a different
    perspective.

    Right now it’s marijuana policy; tomorrow it could be tax or gun
    policy. Imagine a President Kerry prohibiting ads in support of the
    right to keep and bear arms while spending taxpayer money to run ads
    in support of gun control. Congress has paved the way.

    The free exchange of ideas without government censorship is essential
    to the preservation of a free society. There is still a chance,
    however, that free speech will prevail in the end.

    The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday
    heard arguments in a case brought by the Drug Policy Alliance and
    other groups, challenging the Istook Amendment on free-speech grounds.

    Additionally, with enough pressure from voters, Congress could be
    persuaded to repeal the Istook provision this year. Our sons and
    daughters are dying to promote democracy. Congress needs to stop
    undermining it.

    —–

    Bill Piper is director of national affairs for the Drug Policy
    Alliance, an organization that promotes drug policies “grounded in
    science, compassion, health and human rights.”

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

    Please utilize the following URLs

    http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

    http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

    We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, Newshawks and letter
    writing activists.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Focus Alert Specialist

  • Focus Alerts

    #289 Cultivating Compassion

    Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004
    Subject: #289 Cultivating Compassion

    CULTIVATING COMPASSION

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #289 Sunday, 25 April 2004

    Today the Salt Lake Tribune printed the editorial, below, ‘Cultivating
    Compassion’ which slams the U.S. Justice Department over last week’s
    round of medical cannabis legal actions. The editorial, and others
    like it, are worthy of your letters to the editor.

    Friday, the Honolulu Star-Bulletin printed a similar editorial, ‘Let
    Patients Grow Their Own Pakalolo’ on line at http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n619/a08.html

    And there have been a number of other articles published about Judge
    Jeremy Fogel’s decision, all worthy of letters to the editor, which
    can be found at http://www.mapinc.org/people/Jeremy+Fogel

    Need More Facts for Your Letters? See:

    Medical Marijuana http://www.drugwarfacts.org/medicalm.htm

    Distortion 9: Cannabis As Medicine http://www.drugwardistortions.org/distortion9.htm

    Making Medical Marijuana Legally Available http://www.mpp.org/med_mj.html

    Medical Use http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3376

    Medical Marijuana http://www.drugpolicy.org/marijuana/medical/

    **********************************************************************

    ACTIONS YOU CAN TAKE:

    Write a LTEs to the papers in your state about this issue. This is a
    good example of a topic that may result in a printed letter without
    the need to tie it to any other specific item the papers may have printed.

    To find your state/local newspapers, go to MAP’s media links page
    at:

    http://www.mapinc.org/media.htm

    Using the ‘List by Area” dropdown find and bring up the list of
    newspapers in your state and their LTE contact. Note those with the
    higher numbers of Clippings or Excerpts as this tends to indicate a
    higher interest by the paper in our issues, and thus should be your
    first targets.

    Also consider sending the editorials to your local newspapers. Ask
    your papers to please print similar editorial page items.

    Let your members of congress know about how you feel about this issue.
    If you can, visit with the members, or visit their state/local
    offices, as telling them or their staff directly always shows a deep
    concern, stronger than any other message. Or give them a phone call.

    You can use MPP’s Take Action page to send your concern to your
    Senators. Just go to this link, personalize the message with your own
    thoughts and facts, and send. It is easy and fast:

    http://www.mpp.org/USA/index.html

    NORML also has related action pages at:

    http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=2204601&type=CO

    Last, but not least, cannabis is a topic before the legislators, or an
    initiative issue, in a number of states and cities. Please make the
    appropriate contacts for your states. It does not take many folks like you
    to make a real difference! See:

    http://actioncenter.drugpolicy.org/action/moreactions.asp

    http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/

    http://www.mpp.org/campaigns/index.html

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter,
    email messages, etc.)

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ([email protected]) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit.

    This is _Very_ Important as it is one very effective way of gauging
    our impact and effectiveness.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ([email protected]) will help you to
    review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm
    and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    The Editorial:

    Pubdate: Tue, 20 Apr 2004
    Source: Salt Lake Tribune (UT)
    Copyright: 2004 The Salt Lake Tribune
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.sltrib.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/383

    CULTIVATING COMPASSION

    Whenever folks over at the U.S. Justice Department were feeling blue
    about anti-American terrorists, uppity librarians or naked statues
    standing behind the attorney general, they could always take a deep
    drag on the anti-drug drug by busting a few terminal cancer patients
    in California.

    But now some derned activist federal judge has taken that simple
    pleasure away from them. Some days it just doesn’t pay to be a
    jack-booted thug.

    It will be of great comfort to a few people, at least for awhile, to
    be members of the Wo/Men’s Alliance for Medical Marijuana in Santa
    Cruz, Calif. That’s because a federal judge Wednesday ordered the feds
    to stay away while the dispute over California’s medical marijuana law
    plays out in the courts.

    The co-op’s garden was shut down 18 months ago by a federal raid,
    surely one of the ugliest acts of governmental bullying on record.

    But U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel, echoing an earlier appeals court
    ruling, found that the Wo/Men’s Alliance was protected by a state law
    that allows people with a doctor’s recommendation to use marijuana to
    ease the suffering attendant to cancer, cancer treatment, glaucoma or
    other ills that, many believe, are eased by the drug.

    The case is wending its way up to the Supreme Court. But, for now,
    California co-ops run on volunteer labor and donated funds that do not
    engage in anything resembling interstate commerce, may grow and
    distribute free pot to suffering people.

    Even if the medicinal benefits are oversold, medical marijuana laws in
    California and eight other states are clearly motivated by the desire
    to ease human suffering.

    The administration’s actions seem motivated by baser instincts
    including, perhaps, fear that someone might win relief from a
    substance they can grow themselves rather than being at the mercy of
    the price-gouging pharmaceutical industry.

    The Wo/Men’s Alliance grows the marijuana, but the Justice Department
    is full of weeds.

    **********************************************************************

    ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts, Please See:

    Writer’s Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/

    **********************************************************************

    TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

    Please utilize the following URLs

    http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

    http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

    We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, Newshawks and letter
    writing activists.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Focus Alert Specialist