• Focus Alerts

    #370 Don’t Teach Our Children Crime

    Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008
    Subject: #370 Don’t Teach Our Children Crime

    DON’T TEACH OUR CHILDREN CRIME

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #370 – Thursday, 3 July 2008

    The New York Times printed the editorial below today,
    Thursday.

    The editorial does not mention that our young people are often jailed
    as a result of violating our draconian drug laws – which makes the
    editorial a good target for your letters.

    Please also contact your Senator both to support the bill and to
    request that it be strengthened. Contacts for your Senator are at
    http://drugsense.org/url/qhe2AeDy

    Letter to the Editor of the New York Times should be sent quickly as
    the newspaper usually prints letters resulting from editorials within
    a few days – while the editorial itself is still fresh in their
    readers minds.

    The average letter printed in the newspaper is about 140 words in
    length. Printed letters over 200 words are rare. Printed letters tend
    to focus on one specific point in their editorials.

    Yesterday the New York Times published an editorial “Not Winning the
    War on Drugs” which was the subject of the alert at
    http://www.mapinc.org/alert/0369.html Thank You to everyone who has
    already sent a letter to the newspaper about that alert. Since the
    paper did not print any letters in response to that editorial today,
    your letter, if sent soon, could still be printed.

    **********************************************************************

    Pubdate: Thu, 3 Jul 2008
    Source: New York Times (NY)
    Copyright: 2008 The New York Times Company

    Contact: [email protected]

    Don’t Teach Our Children Crime

    Under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, the
    states agreed to humanize their often Dickensian juvenile justice
    systems in exchange for increased federal aid. This promising
    arrangement collapsed in the 1990s during hysteria about an adolescent
    crime wave that never materialized. The states intensified all kinds
    of punishments for children and sent large numbers to adult jails
    where, research has shown, they are more likely to be battered,
    traumatized and transformed into hard-core, recidivist criminals.

    Congress is in the process of reauthorizing the law, and it ought to
    bar the states from housing children in adult jails, except for the
    most heinous crimes. Sadly, the updated version of the law, recently
    introduced in the Senate, falls short of that goal. But it does
    include a number of farsighted measures that discourage the placement
    of children in adult jails during the pretrial period and expands
    protections for children charged as adults.

    The need for these measures is alarmingly evident in a report issued
    last year by the Campaign for Youth Justice, an advocacy group. The
    report found that as many as 150,000 people under the age of 18 are
    held in adult jails in any given year. More than half of young people
    who are transferred into the adult system are never convicted as
    adults — and many are never convicted at all.

    The Senate bill takes a comprehensive approach to these issues. It
    would considerably tighten rules aimed at keeping children out of
    adult jails during pretrial periods. Children arrested for truancy,
    running away or other offenses that would not be criminal if committed
    by an adult would not be placed in juvenile jail unless absolutely
    necessary.

    It also would require the states to work toward reducing racial and
    ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. It increases
    federal funding for technical assistance and for drug treatment,
    mental health care, mentoring and after-care programs that keep
    children out of the juvenile system in the first place. The bill
    advocates an evidence-based approach to hand out the money.

    Jailing and criminalizing young Americans causes a lot more crime than
    it punishes or prevents. This bill represents an important step toward
    rational and compassionate justice for troubled children.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #369 Not Winning The War On Drugs – The New York Times

    Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008
    Subject: #369 Not Winning The War On Drugs – The New York Times

    NOT WINNING THE WAR ON DRUGS – THE NEW YORK TIMES

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #369 – Wednesday, 2 July 2008

    The New York Times printed the editorial below today,
    Wednesday.

    Letter to the Editor of the New York Times should be sent quickly as
    the newspaper usually prints letters resulting from editorials within
    a few days – while the editorial itself is still fresh in their
    readers minds.

    The average letter printed in the newspaper is about 140 words in
    length. Printed letters over 200 words are rare. Printed letters tend
    to focus on one specific point in their editorials.

    Thanks for your effort and support. It’s not what others do it’s what
    YOU do.

    **********************************************************************

    Pubdate: Wed, 2 Jul 2008
    Source: New York Times (NY)
    Copyright: 2008 The New York Times Company

    Contact: [email protected]

    NOT WINNING THE WAR ON DRUGS

    According to the White House, this country is scoring big wins in the
    war on drugs, especially against the cocaine cartels. Officials
    celebrate that cocaine seizures are up — leading to higher prices on
    American streets. Cocaine use by teenagers is down, and, officials
    say, workplace tests suggest adult use is falling.

    John Walters, the White House drug czar, declared earlier this year
    that “courageous and effective” counternarcotics efforts in Colombia
    and Mexico “are disrupting the production and flow of cocaine.”

    This enthusiasm rests on a very selective reading of the data. Another
    look suggests that despite the billions of dollars the United States
    has spent battling the cartels, it has hardly made a dent in the
    cocaine trade.

    While seizures are up, so are shipments. According to United States
    government figures, 1,421 metric tons of cocaine were shipped through
    Latin America to the United States and Europe last year — 39 percent
    more than in 2006. And despite massive efforts at eradication, the
    United Nations estimates that the area devoted to growing coca leaf in
    the Andes expanded 16 percent last year. The administration disputes
    that number.

    The drug cartels are not running for cover.

    Mexico and parts of Central America are being swept up in drug-related
    violence. Latin Americans are becoming heavy consumers of cocaine, and
    traffickers are opening new routes to Europe through fragile West
    African countries. Some experts argue that the rising price of cocaine
    on American streets is mostly the result of a strong euro and
    fast-growing demand in Europe.

    Workplace drug tests notwithstanding, cocaine use in the United States
    is not falling. About 2.5 percent of Americans used cocaine at least
    once in 2006, the same percentage as in 2002, according to the
    Department of Health and Human Services.

    While cocaine use has fallen among younger teenagers, 12th graders are
    using more: 5.2 percent used cocaine last year — up from 4.8 percent
    in 2001 and 3.1 percent at the low point in 1992, says a Monitoring
    the Future survey done by the University of Michigan.

    All this suggests serious problems with a strategy that focuses
    overwhelmingly on disrupting the supply of drugs while doing far too
    little to curb domestic demand.

    Washington spent $1.4 billion on drug-related foreign assistance last
    year — mostly to equip Colombia’s security forces and spray coca
    crops in the Andes. It spent another $7 billion on drug-related law
    enforcement and interdiction efforts at home and abroad. It spent less
    than $5 billion on education, prevention and treatment programs at
    home to curtail substance abuse.

    The counternarcotics effort has produced some successes. Marijuana use
    in the United States has declined since 2002, the earliest year for
    which the government has comparable data. Teenage use of other drugs,
    like methamphetamine, has fallen sharply. With American aid,
    Colombia’s armed forces have severely weakened the FARC guerrillas, a
    major player in the drug trade.

    The next administration should continue to help Latin American
    governments take on the traffickers. But it must learn from the
    current strategy’s shortcomings.

    Eradication efforts are most likely to have more success if more money
    is spent on programs to wean coca growers from the business and
    improve the lives of their families and communities. Mexico, in
    particular, is in deep trouble, and the next American president should
    build on the Bush administration’s plans to provide counternarcotics
    aid. There needs to be a different mix: less money for equipment for
    security forces and more for economic development and programs to
    reform and strengthen Mexico’s judicial system.

    Above all, the next administration must put much more effort into
    curbing demand — spending more on treating drug addicts and less on
    putting them in jail. Drug courts, which sentence users to treatment,
    still deal only with a small minority of drug cases and should be
    vastly expanded. Drug-treatment programs for imprisoned drug abusers,
    especially juvenile offenders, must also be expanded.

    Over all, drug abuse must be seen more as a public health concern and
    not primarily a law enforcement problem. Until demand is curbed at
    home, there is no chance of winning the war on drugs.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #368 California Patient Caught In The War On Medical Marijuana

    Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008
    Subject: #368 California Patient Caught In The War On Medical Marijuana

    CALIFORNIA PATIENT CAUGHT IN THE WAR ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #368 – Tuesday, 24 Jun 2008

    Orange County is considered to be among the most conservative in
    California. The Orange County Register is the county’s major
    newspaper. Over the years the newspaper has supported in editorials
    and columns California’s Proposition 215.

    Last Saturday the newspaper printed the article below. In addition to
    the article, the newspaper’s website is currently conducting an
    opinion poll titled “Should marijuana be legal?” and providing a
    discussion forum about the article. If you wish to vote in the poll
    and/or place a comment in the forum please go to:

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/monson-says-marijuana-2072170-police-adams

    Please also consider sending a Letter to the Editor to The Orange
    County Register expressing your reaction to the article.

    Thanks for your effort and support. It’s not what others do it’s what
    YOU do.

    *********************************************************************

    Pubdate: Sat, 21 Jun 2008
    Source: Orange County Register, The (CA)
    Copyright: 2008 The Orange County Register
    Contact: [email protected]
    Author: Eugene W. Fields, The Orange County Register

    DISABLED MAN FIGHTS FOR HIS MARIJUANA

    Charles Monson, a Quadriplegic, Had His Home Raided and His Medicinal
    Marijuana Seized at Gunpoint.

    A swimming accident three decades ago at Newport Beach left Charles
    Monson paralyzed.

    A drug raid at his home about a year ago left Monson without the
    marijuana he says he needs. The raid has left him depending on a
    medical marijuana dispensary in Orange that was also raided. Fighting
    to stay in business, the small store-front dispensary has helped
    Monson deal with his pain.

    Monson, 45, was paralyzed in 1979 when he and a friend decided to go
    for a swim. “I dove under a wave, hit a shallow spot and broke my
    neck,” Monson recalls. “I was paralyzed instantly and was floating
    face-down.”

    Monson, who is confined to a wheelchair and has lost most of the use
    of his hands, tried to remain active. He’s an avid skydiver, despite
    breaking his legs twice

    Nevertheless, he says he lives in constant pain and
    discomfort.

    “My brain isn’t able to constantly able to monitor the muscles in my
    legs,” he says. “Any little stimulus like being touched or moving my
    wheelchair or sitting still for a while and then moving will trigger a
    muscle spasm, big ones, that will yank my body to the side.”

    As a result, Monson was chronically sleep-deprived to the point of
    falling asleep behind the wheel of his specially equipped van. Doctors
    prescribed muscle relaxants and various other seizure medications, but
    Monson says he didn’t like the side effects.

    Finds Relief

    “I had tried Valium, Baclofen, Gabapentin. That gave me a sense of not
    being sharp in my mind and just feeling kind of woozy,” Monson says.
    “I tried Marinol, which is synthetic marijuana. It’s very hard to
    dose. It’s either not very effective, or when it gets to the point of
    being effective, you’re loopy.”

    Monson says a friend recommended marijuana in the 1980s and after
    trying it, he said he found relief: “I smoked it in bed and I slept
    better than I ever had. The other thing that makes cannabis so much
    more effective than any other of the spasticity drugs is that it
    allows me rather than just treating my spasticity to manage it.”

    When California voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996, which allowed
    marijuana usage for medicinal purposes, Monson says he started to grow
    marijuana.

    Monson says his life changed dramatically on the morning of October
    30, 2007. “I wake up to a horrendously loud pounding on the front door
    at 7 a.m. in the morning,” Monson says. “My friend said it was the
    police and I told him to let them in.”

    Monson says a dozen Orange police officers armed with assault rifles
    and bullet-proof vests swarmed into his modest home and handcuffed
    both his house guest and care provider before coming into Monson’s
    bedroom, demanding he get out of bed.

    “I told them I couldn’t so they uncuffed my care provider,” Monson
    says. “He got me dressed and into the chair and then they (police)
    went about ransacking my house.”

    Monson says he used a spare bedroom to cultivate his marijuana plants,
    where a sign posted on the door read that the plants were for
    medicinal purposes.

    The police entered the room and, according to Monson, confiscated 16
    plants and roughly 2-1/2 ounces of marijuana.

    “I told them I was growing it legally and they said it’s against
    federal law,” Monson says. “They came down on me like I was some drug
    kingpin.”

    Sgt. Dan Adams of the Orange Police Department says 19 plants were
    seized and Monson was arrested for felony cultivation of marijuana,
    theft of utilities, sales of marijuana and conspiracy.

    “When you get 19 plants and you get a full-blown irrigation system and
    a light system, it was obviously a substantial operation he had
    running there,” Adams said. “It’s a good amount, but anything is a
    good amount because it’s illegal as far as law enforcement is concerned.”

    The District Attorney’s office declined to prosecute the
    case.

    “The first month after the raid, I couldn’t sleep well,” Monson said.
    “Finally, it occurred to me that I was having a post-traumatic effect
    because I didn’t know when they were going to bang down my door again.”

    Searching for Marijuana

    Fearful of growing marijuana, Monson turned to other
    sources.

    “I had to go to people a buy it. None of them have ever been touched
    by the police,” he says. “I don’t know why they came after me.
    Somebody thought I was a king-pin.”

    In December, Monson hired an attorney and decided to file a civil suit
    against the city. Four months later he read about Nature’s Wellness, a
    dispensary on Lincoln Avenue in Orange that had been raided.

    Monson said he visited with Bob Adams, the dispensary owner, to share
    information about his case. Monson said he worked out a deal to
    receive half of the two ounces of marijuana he needs a month to manage
    his condition.

    Adams, who was detained by the Drug Enforcement Agency after his shop
    was raided in March, says he was just providing a service to another
    patient with a doctor’s recommendation.

    “This man needs medicine and I’ve got it,” Adams says. “That’s what
    I’m here for.”

    Adams says hearing about Monson’s arrest upset him.

    “We’ve got a quadriplegic here. It’s amazing that he wakes up every
    morning,” Adams says. “Don’t we have better things to do as far as our
    local authorities are concerned than chase around a quadriplegic
    that’s in pain?”

    Monson says he was grateful for the aid from the dispensary and is
    waiting for his court case to move ahead.

    “I probably won’t (grow) until that whole thing is settled with the
    police,” he says. “I don’t want a decent garden going again, just to
    have it taken away.”

    *********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism
    Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    *********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    *********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #367 Senior Citizens Caught In The War On Drugs

    Date: Wed, 28 May 2008
    Subject: #367 Senior Citizens Caught In The War On Drugs

    SENIOR CITIZENS CAUGHT IN THE WAR ON DRUGS

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #367 – Wednesday, 28 May 2008

    Below the Florida Times-Union Senior Columnist Tonya Weathersbee
    provides a disturbing analysis of an aspect of the failure of the War
    on Drugs.

    Please consider writing and sending a Letter to the Editor of the
    Florida Times Union expressing your reaction to this column.

    Thanks for your effort and support. It’s not what others do it’s what
    YOU do.

    **********************************************************************

    Contact: Florida Times-Union

    http://www.jacksonville.com/aboutus/letters_to_editor.shtml

    Pubdate: Mon, 26 May 2008
    Source: Florida Times-Union (FL)
    Copyright: 2008 The Florida Times-Union
    Author: Tonyaa Weathersbee, The Times-Union

    SOME ARE DRIVEN TO CRIME BY ECONOMIC DESPERATION

    Ruth Davis says she isn’t on drugs. But she was desperate.

    She’s also a cautionary tale.

    According to a recent McClatchy News Service story, the Miami
    grandmother is sitting in a North Carolina jail. She’s been there
    since December. That was when a state trooper nabbed her as she was
    transporting 33 pounds of marijuana to New York.

    He stopped Davis for speeding, but then noticed a strong odor as she
    rolled down her car window. Her answers to the trooper’s questions
    about her travel plans didn’t jibe.

    So he asked if he could search her car. She agreed. But Davis didn’t
    know he was going to call the dogs to help him look.

    Game over.

    Drug enforcement officials say that people like Davis, who is 65, are
    becoming part of a trend; that drug dealers are now recruiting elderly
    people to carry drugs because there’s less of a chance that they will
    be stopped or profiled. There’s also the chance that police will be
    disarmed by their sweetness and vulnerability. Davis, in fact, said
    that she had hoped to charm her way out of a speeding ticket.

    I almost wish that had worked for her. Because it wasn’t greed that
    made Davis agree to become a drug mule.

    It was pain.

    It was the pain of not being able to pay the $20,000-plus that she
    owed doctors for treatment of a blood disease. It was the pain of
    seeing her daughter’s face disfigured from a car crash, and not being
    able to help her pay the $3,000 needed for corrective plastic surgery.
    It was the pain that a person feels when hitting rock bottom with no
    safety net to catch her.

    It’s a pain that has been exploited by drug dealers who recruit the
    desperate and the defeated.

    And just as the drug trade has become the dominant economy for many
    poor, inner-city communities, it’s not surprising that as other safety
    nets begin to fray, more people will grab on to anything to stop their
    free fall.

    In Davis’ case, that meant grabbing onto the promises of a drug
    dealer.

    Me, I’m not all that surprised that some elderly folks would be
    vulnerable to that kind of coercion.

    In some neighborhoods in which drug dealers are the closest thing to
    philanthropists that most people there will ever see, they help some
    old people pay bills. But while Davis wasn’t exactly poor – she said
    she owns her own home and works as a diet consultant – her medical
    bills apparently still made it hard for her to make ends meet.

    And, in case we forget, soaring medical bills can plunge anyone into
    poverty. Or it can push them to make thoughtless choices.

    So when I see cases such as hers, I’m reminded of how the drug trade
    is fueled by different degrees of hopelessness.

    In the inner cities, you have kids who work as drug sellers and
    lookouts because few know the lure of legitimate work, because not
    much of that exists where they live. Then you have some people who
    sell drugs to supplement low-wage jobs. Unlike Davis, they aren’t
    casualties of an emergency as much as they are casualties of an
    illicit economy that has usurped the legitimate economy.

    Then there’s the hopelessness that turned Davis into a drug
    mule.

    Such hopelessness is the kind that overwhelms people who are being let
    down by what many have come to view as guarantees in American life;
    that if you pay your bills, obey the law, drink your milk and say your
    prayers, the system won’t allow misfortunes like medical emergencies
    to make you destitute.

    Now I know that not every senior citizen who is faced with hardships
    is going to sell drugs. Yet, Davis’ story still is a revealing one.

    Among other things, it illustrates, once again, the failure of the war
    on drugs. We fill our prisons and jails with nonviolent offenders like
    Davis – a woman who, ironically, became a felon to avoid becoming a
    deadbeat – as the kingpins go free.

    And even as people like Davis sit in jail, Americans continue to use
    drugs at about the same rate as they did when President Nixon declared
    a war on drugs in 1971.

    As long as that continues to happen, and as long as jobs continue to
    hemorrhage and medical costs continue to spiral, people will look for
    ways to survive.

    And the drug lords will be waiting.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #366 Tallahassee Drug Cops Accessories To Murder

    Date: Mon, 19 May 2008
    Subject: #366 Tallahassee Drug Cops Accessories To Murder

    TALLAHASSEE DRUG COPS ACCESSORIES TO MURDER

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #366 – Monday, 19 May 2008

    Another civilian alleged to be guilty of nothing more than possession
    of ecstasy and 25 grams of marijuana has been killed while under the
    watch of narcotics officers. This time, the dead woman is Rachel
    Morningstar Hoffman, a resident of Clearwater FL and a 2007 graduate
    of Florida State University in Tallahassee.

    Hoffman, 23, was found dead in rural Taylor County early Friday after
    two men suspected in her kidnapping and robbery led investigators to
    her body. Murder charges are pending, according to the Tallahassee
    Police Department.

    Hoffman was last seen Wednesday night near Forestmeadows Park while
    attempting to assist TPD vice investigators by buying drugs and a gun
    from two men.

    Though not yet convicted on the charges of marijuana possession and
    possessing ecstasy with intent to sell, the Tallahassee drug cops
    intimidated her into doing what should instead be the most risky part
    of their job. Rather than expose themselves – while using their state
    police training and their resources of being heavily armed and
    protected – they sent in Hoffman unarmed to deal with drug and weapon
    suppliers.

    Neither Ms. Hoffman’s attorney of record nor the states attorneys
    office was notified of her involvement in this dangerous, high risk
    undercover operation by Tallahassee Police.

    Further, Ms Hoffman’s participation in a court-ordered drug-treatment
    program should have precluded her from buying drugs for police, legal
    and treatment professionals have stated.

    Our country supports drug treatment. People undergoing treatment are
    required to avoid all contacts with anybody who uses or sells illegal
    drugs. Thus we should demand that laws preclude the use of any person
    undergoing treatment as an informant.

    ONLY due to the insanity of drug Prohibition policies would such an
    operation take place within our communities putting civilians at risk
    of injury and death as they do jobs that should instead be done by
    real police. But unfortunately, drug Prohibition guarantees that all
    drug dealing will be covert – behind closed doors – carried out by
    mystery players and participants.

    This is in contrast to the sensible system in place for literally 99%
    of drugs – notably alcohol, tobacco and Rx pharmaceuticals – where all
    dealers are out in the open. Police and regulators can easily
    investigate the how, when, where and who of all drug dealing that is
    not forced on to the street by 21st century Prohibition.

    Florida police, elected officials and voters all need to carefully
    consider how much longer we will endorse such a policy that leaves
    100% control of production and dealing for a short list of in-demand
    drugs to street dealers, gangs and international cartels.

    Despite the sad death of Rachel Hoffman ten days ago and despite any
    number of future deaths that will occur among police and civilians
    alike, the “War on Drugs” continues to be an abject failure for
    reducing either the use of illicit drugs or the aggressive, violent
    street sales of those same drugs.

    Everyone needs to ask, “How many more police and civilians need to die
    before we come to our senses and end drug Prohibition?”

    Please consider sending a Letter to the Editor directed to the
    Tallahassee Democrat, which is the location of this sad story, and
    also the newspaper read daily by Florida State legislators and
    Governor Charlie Christ.

    Please also consider sending letters to other Florida newspapers which
    have carried opinions about this murder.

    Newspapers expect that the letters they receive be unique so please
    insure that each letter you send is at least slightly different.
    Letters of 200 words or less have the best chance of being printed.

    Thanks for your effort and support. It’s not what others do it’s what
    YOU do.

    **********************************************************************

    The first story from the May 10 Tallahassee Democrat may be read
    here:

    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n483/a06.html

    MAP has archived almost 30 news and opinion clippings related to Ms.
    Hoffman’s murder. New clippings are added each day:

    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Rachel+Hoffman

    Some of the best items to respond to are the Editorial and Opinion
    clippings, with the most recent being:

    US FL: Editorial: Rachel Hoffman Case Demands Outside
    Review (Tallahassee Democrat)
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n493/a06.html

    US FL: OPED: Innocence Lost on Both Sides of the Law (Tallahassee
    Democrat) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n495/a01.html

    US FL: Editorial: Why Was Informer Put At Risk? (St Petersburg Times)
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n504/a12.html

    US FL: PUB LTE: Blame the War on Drugs (Tampa Tribune)
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n506/a04.html

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #365 Drug Czar Walters Exaggerating Again

    Date: Mon, 12 May 2008
    Subject: #365 Drug Czar Walters Exaggerating Again

    DRUG CZAR WALTERS EXAGGERATING AGAIN

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #365 – Monday, 12 May 2008

    Well if we didn’t already know it was the month of May, the Office of
    National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) in Washington DC led by Drug Czar
    John Walters is doing their best to remind us – again. For the eighth
    year in a row under Walters’ lead, the ONDCP has used the first half
    of May to release their annual “latest scary facts about marijuana”
    press release.

    Packaged and carefully crafted in the guise of a scientific study, the
    ONDCP has again done nothing more than take a few correlative facts
    about teenagers and marijuana use and then ‘conclude’ that the pot use
    creates causative and inescapable debilitating health effects for our
    youth.

    This year, it’s “depression.” Citing the results of a dubious survey
    from New Zealand wherein teenagers who acknowledged feeling depression
    also often cited use of marijuana, the ONDCP report concludes that
    teenagers who use cannabis face an increased likelihood of being
    depressed. Sadly, this is as scientifically causative as saying that
    many people who feel pain also use aspirin. And that therefore
    aspirin use causes pain.

    Even more grim is that such junk science press releases are used to
    add fuel to the fiery federal insistence that all marijuana use – even
    for adults, and even for appropriate medical use with a doctor’s
    recommendation (currently legal in 12 U.S. states and Canada) – should
    remain a criminal offense – an offense worthy of arrest, prosecution,
    incarceration and a lifetime criminal record.

    Fortunately, based on our 11+ years of covering drug policy news at
    MAP, we’ve come to see that an increasing number of newspaper
    reporters and editors view information coming from the Drug Czar’s
    office with a cocked eyebrow and/or even a smirking dismissal. That’s
    in large part due to their receiving a steady diet of more honest and
    truthful information about marijuana – both it’s negative effects and
    it’s positive benefits. That flow of alternative personal and
    professional testimony comes from people like you – the users of MAP
    and the people most interested in a public drug policy that is founded
    on facts rather than emotionally driven misinformation.

    MAP has been archived news clippings that resulted from the ONDCP
    press release over this past weekend and will continue to add more as
    newshawks like you find more. All the clippings found so far start
    with a subject line of “US” and may be found here:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topic/depression

    Please consider writing and sending a Letter to the Editor to the
    listed newspapers of your choice and the newspapers people read where
    you live. If you write to more than one newspaper, we strongly suggest
    at least some modification of your message so that each newspaper
    receives a unique letter.

    Often the best targets for response are Opinion items (Editorials,
    OPEDs and other LTEs) which may be printed during the days ahead.
    Please recheck the link above during the week for additional targets
    for letters.

    Thanks for your effort and support. It’s not what others do it’s what
    YOU do.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for tips on how to write
    LTEs that are printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #364 Did You Read The Los Angeles Times Dust Up Debates?

    Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008
    Subject: #364 Did You Read The Los Angeles Times Dust Up Debates?

    DID YOU READ THE LOS ANGELES TIMES DUST UP DEBATES?

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #364 – Friday, 25 April 2008

    This week the editorial pages of the Los Angeles Times featured a drug
    war debate between Jacob Sullum, who needs no introduction; and
    Charles “Cully” Stimson who was a local, state and federal prosecutor,
    a military prosecutor and defense attorney, and a deputy assistant
    secretary of Defense. Currently, he is a senior legal fellow at the
    Heritage Foundation.

    The series is MAP archived as follows:

    Monday’s DUST UP http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n414/a05.html

    Tuesday’s DUST UP http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n415/a09.html

    Wednesday’s DUST UP http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n418/a05.html

    Thursday’s DUST UP http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n421/a02.html

    Friday’s DUST UP http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08.n426.a01.html

    Besides being targets for letters to the editor the series provides
    arguments we are likely to see as efforts are made for and against
    initiatives which will be on the ballot in various states.

    Tuesday’s DUST UP about medical marijuana presents arguments we may
    see about the Michigan initiative http://StopArrestingPatients.org/
    Already one Detroit TV station has been broadcasting anti-initiative
    ads you may see at http://stoparrestingpatients.org/video.html

    The other OPEDs present arguments we may see used for or against the
    California’s initiative, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act of
    2008 http://www.drugpolicy.org/statebystate/california/nora/

    What happens on Election Day is up to you. If you are not registered
    to vote, there are websites that provide help, like Rock the Vote at
    http://drugsense.org/url/Ylqy68Vz

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #364 Congress Does Something Right – Special Interests Scream

    Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008
    Subject: #364 Congress Does Something Right – Special Interests Scream

    CONGRESS DOES SOMETHING RIGHT – SPECIAL INTERESTS SCREAM

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #363 – Sunday, 30 March 2008

    President Bush, whose administration has long expressed the opinion
    that federal dollars should not be the primary means of funding state
    and local law enforcement, has dramatically cut funding in the 2009
    budget for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants, the
    primary program used to finance drug enforcement in nearly every state
    for more than 20 years.

    In FY 2007, the Byrne program was funded at $520 million. For FY 2008
    — which starts on October 1st, 2008 — the Senate had originally
    funded the Byrne program at $660 million and the House at $600 million
    in their respective appropriations bills. However, in the omnibus FY
    2008 appropriations bill signed into law in December 2007, the Byrne
    program funding was cut to $170 million for the coming year — a 67
    percent decrease from 2007 funding levels. The cuts will devastate
    state law enforcement efforts by shutting down multi-jurisdictional
    drug task forces, requiring layoffs of police and prosecutors.

    Since there is no way to measure where the underground drug industry
    is most active, the grants have always been a prime pork-barrel way
    for members of Congress to help their districts. As Congress returns
    to session this week efforts to restore the full grant funding will
    continue.

    As news clippings from this year in the MAP archives show, with new
    clippings being added frequently, law enforcement and elected
    officials at all levels are in a panic about the possible loss of funds. See:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Byrne

    Some of the articles indicate that the grant funds have caught some
    bad folks who, perhaps, deserve to be caught. Of course the articles
    are not likely to tell you about the busts of marijuana users,
    including medicinal users, which have been funded at least in part by
    the grants. None of the news about police corruption or drug raids
    gone bad are likely to be tied to Byrne grant funds, as they often
    are. Remember Tulia, Texas? That was Byrne grant money at work.

    Please contact your members of Congress to let them know what you
    think about fully funding the Byrne grant program. The ‘Find and
    contact your federal, state, and local officials.’ box in the upper
    left corner of this webpage makes it easy. http://www.congress.org/

    OMB Watch has produced a report for the last available year, FY 2006,
    which has amazing data. See which of your representatives in Congress
    were able to secure the most Byrne funds for their district, and much
    more at http://drugsense.org/url/SezrJZJY

    Letters to the Editor about Byrne grant funding are, of course, always
    appropriate.

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #362 Medical Marijuana In Michigan – Yea Or Nay?

    Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008
    Subject: #362 Medical Marijuana In Michigan – Yea Or Nay?

    MEDICAL MARIJUANA IN MICHIGAN – YEA OR NAY?

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #362 – Monday, 24 March 2008

    Earlier this month, the voters of Michigan succeeded in qualifying an
    initiative for the November election ballot. When passed by the voters
    on November 4th Michigan law will allow patients to use, possess, and
    grow their own marijuana for medical purposes with their doctors’
    approval. This will likely make Michigan the first medical marijuana
    state in the heartland, although there are bills pending in some other
    midwest states. Michigan is home to more than 10 million people. Of
    the states with current effective medical marijuana laws only
    California has a larger population.

    Three articles were written for the Sunday editions of the Kalamazoo
    Gazette this month, a newspaper in the heartland of Michigan. They
    illustrate the battle Michigan folks will have in the media in the
    months ahead. The author of the articles, Chris Killian, went to some
    length to find both pro and con arguments.

    Please read the articles at http://www.mapinc.org/author/Chris+Killian
    Note that for the two oldest articles Michigan letter writers have
    responded as shown at the ‘Letters’ link at the top of each MAP
    archived article.

    We are not suggesting that out of state letter writers respond to
    Michigan press articles about the initiative. This is a battle best
    fought by in state letter writers.

    Folks outside Michigan may find other ways to support the initiative
    by going to the initiative website at http://stoparrestingpatients.org/

    But the three articles do illustrate the type of arguments made in the
    press both for and against medicinal marijuana initiatives, bills and
    laws in every state. As letter writers improve their arguments in
    letters sent to their state papers they advance the issue.

    **********************************************************************

    Excerpts from ‘Nuclear-Blast Survivor Heads Veterans for Medical
    Marijuana Access’ published on March 9th:

    The atomic explosions off remote islands in the South Pacific seemed
    to turn night into day.

    They also turned Martin Chilcutt into a marijuana user.

    Chilcutt said the drug has helped him to ease the pain he says dates
    back to his exposure to radiation during a 1956 U.S. government
    project testing nuclear and thermonuclear weapons.

    A state ballot proposal could allow voters in November to decide
    whether Chilcutt’s measures to self-medicate should be legal in Michigan.

    The 74-year-old former intelligence officer with the U.S. Naval Air
    Force has used other medications to help him with his physical and
    psychological problems, but marijuana helps “so much better,” he said.

    [snip]

    Although there are different ways to use the drug, such as ingesting
    or inhaling it, there is no difference in the drug’s effect based on
    consumption, according to the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate
    Care, which is spearheading the state marijuana initiative.

    “It just makes life so much easier,” he said. “It allows you to be
    comfortable.”

    Chilcutt, a retired psychotherapist, said he first learned of
    marijuana’s medical benefits in the late 1970s while counseling
    Vietnam War veterans in California. They told him the drug could help
    allay his pain, he said.

    He said he takes eight other medications for ailments the marijuana
    doesn’t help, including a thyroid condition.

    Advocates for the medical use of marijuana say it’s also effective in
    easing symptoms from other serious illnesses such as HIV/AIDS,
    glaucoma and multiple sclerosis.

    Critics cite a U.S. Food and Drug Administration report in 2006 that
    said “no sound scientific studies” support the medical use of the drug.

    If the marijuana-use proposal is approved by state voters, Michigan
    would become the 15th state — and the first in the Midwest — with a
    law that permits marijuana use for seriously ill people. Michigan law
    currently prohibits marijuana use for any reason.

    It’s estimated between 40,000 and 50,000 people — about one-half of 1
    percent of Michigan residents — would be eligible to use marijuana
    for medical purposes. In states where the law is now in place, it’s
    estimated the same percentage of residents would qualify to use the
    drug, according to the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care.

    [snip]

    **********************************************************************

    The article ‘Most Area Lawmakers Oppose Marijuana As Medical
    Treatment’ published March 16th:

    For five years, state Sen. Tom George worked for Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo, sometimes prescribing a synthetic form of marijuana called
    Marinol to help ease a person’s pain or discomfort.

    But George, an anesthesiologist, opposes a ballot proposal that seeks
    to legalize marijuana use in Michigan for those seriously ill.

    State Rep. Fulton Sheen, a conservative Republican, opposed
    medical-marijuana use until he heard testimony from people who said
    they got relief from debilitating conditions by using the drug.

    He now supports the initiative, which could appear on the Nov. 4
    ballot.

    Of southwestern Michigan’s 10 state lawmakers, seven said they oppose
    legalizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

    Joining George, R-Texas Township, were state Sens. Patricia Birkholz,
    R-Saugatuck; Cameron Brown, R-Sturgis; and Ron Jelinek, R-Three Oaks;
    and state Reps. Jack Hoogendyk, R-Texas Township; Tonya Schuitmaker,
    R-Lawton; and Rick Shaffer, R-Three Rivers. Such an initiative, they
    think, could lead to more crime and abuse among nonmedical marijuana
    users and could be the first step to complete legalization of marijuana.

    “Marijuana is illegal for a reason,” Jelinek said. “Its legalization,
    even for medical reasons, would denigrate our society eventually.
    (Using marijuana) is akin to a self-induced mental illness.”

    State Reps. Robert Jones, D-Kalamazoo, and Sheen, R-Plainwell, support
    the initiative. They said those seriously ill should have marijuana as
    a treatment option if it helps and is properly regulated.

    “The right story needs to be told by the right people,” Jones said.
    “We can’t be afraid of this as a society. Marijuana is a legitimate
    treatment for those suffering from serious diseases.”

    State Rep. Lorence Wenke, R-Galesburg, said he is undecided on the
    medical-marijuana initiative.

    “These are the types of proposals that politicians run from,” Wenke
    said. “It’s a very intense issue.”

    Bill Ballenger, a Lansing-based political analyst and editor of Inside
    Michigan Politics, said it’s easier for the Legislature to choose to
    not act on the initiative and allow voters to decide its fate. Leaders
    from the Senate and House have said they don’t expect legislative
    action on the proposal. Gov. Jennifer Granholm opposes it.

    “Finding a legislator who forms a gutsy position on issues like
    medical marijuana, like supporting it, is difficult,” said Ballenger,
    adding he expects voters to pass the ballot initiative.

    Change of Heart

    Sheen said he was skeptical about supporting marijuana use for medical
    needs until he heard testimony from people who said it helped ease
    their suffering.

    The 2006 hearing was held on a bill that was similar to the current
    ballot initiative. The measure never got out of a House committee.

    “As I listened to their testimony and heard how (marijuana) had helped
    them, my mind began to change,” Sheen said. “Now I look at (marijuana)
    as a kind of prescription drug for those who are very sick. And if it
    alleviates symptoms, isn’t that what a prescription drug is supposed
    to do?”

    In the 1990s Sheen’s brother, who had contracted AIDS, was dying. In
    the final months of his life he smoked marijuana, which helped him to
    breathe and swallow easier, Sheen said.

    “Although I didn’t agree with what he was doing at the time, it helped
    him,” Sheen said. “But now my mind has been changed.”

    But George, who worked from 1996 to 2001 at Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo, said the active ingredient in marijuana —
    tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC — is already available in pill form.
    Although George admits many patients to whom he prescribed Marinol
    responded favorably, marijuana — even in synthetic form — should not
    be “a front-line treatment,” he said.

    “What is the additional benefit of legalizing marijuana?” George said.
    “And even with the Marinol, it should play a small role in any treatment.”

    Potential for Abuse

    It’s estimated about one-half of 1 percent of Michigan residents,
    between 40,000 and 50,000 people, would be eligible for
    medical-marijuana use.

    “There is such widespread use of marijuana that having a very few
    patients use it legally isn’t that big of a problem,” Jones said.

    Other area legislators disagree.

    “Everybody’s going to have a backache,” Jelinek said of the potential
    for people faking chronic pain or other serious health problems.

    Schuitmaker said she “sympathizes with suffering individuals,” but
    still can’t support the initiative.

    “This would be legalizing a drug that has had a detrimental effect on
    society and be the first step to the legalization of marijuana for
    nonmedical uses,” she said. “It’s a slippery slope.”

    The proposal calls for registered medical users to keep the marijuana
    in a secure, locked location. Users who give or sell their marijuana
    to those who are not authorized to have it could be subject to stiff
    fines and possible jail time. Users also would have to register
    themselves with the state and carry a state-issued ID card indicating
    they are a registered medical user.

    Even with such controls, some lawmakers question how effective
    enforcement and regulation will be, especially if the number of
    medical marijuana users increases.

    “There are other options out there for very sick people (besides
    marijuana). By not supporting this, it’s not like we’re denying a
    dying patient relief,” said Hoogendyk, who recently announced he will
    challenge Democratic Sen. Carl Levin in the U.S. Senate.

    **********************************************************************

    Excerpt from ‘Debate Continues Whether Risks of Medical Marijuana
    Outweigh the Benefits’ published March 23rd:

    The chief medical officer of Kalamazoo County might use marijuana to
    alleviate the pain of his glaucoma — if it were legal.

    In 2000, Richard Tooker, 54, was diagnosed with pigmentary glaucoma, a
    rare eye disease where fluid buildup inside the eye can lead to
    intense pain. Blindness is also possible.

    “I would consider taking it, if it were legal, for medical use,” he
    said. “I want to keep my vision.”

    Studies have shown marijuana can lessen pressure in the eyes of those
    with glaucoma.

    Tooker said he would have to consult with legal counsel before he used
    the drug. That’s because, even if Michigan voters in November decide
    to allow medical marijuana use by seriously ill patients, it still
    would be illegal under federal law.

    Users of medical marijuana, as well as others who support its use, say
    the drug offers relief to those suffering debilitating conditions.
    They also say it would be cheaper than buying the drug off the street
    and that use and production can be controlled if properly regulated.

    But questions remain.

    How would the appropriate dose be established for those who are deemed
    eligible users? Are there possible negative health effects from using
    the drug for medical reasons? Do alternatives to medical marijuana
    already exist?

    “On the balance, it’s a good thing,” Tooker said of medical marijuana.
    “And if we’re going to legalize marijuana for medical use in Michigan,
    let’s legalize it across the country. It’s a dicey, difficult issue.”

    State Sen. Tom George, R-Texas Township, worked for Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo and sometimes prescribed a synthetic — and legal – — form
    of marijuana called Marinol.

    But the drug is not cheap.

    [snip]

    George, an anesthesiologist, opposes the ballot initiative because of
    the availability of Marinol and the possible health risks of medical
    marijuana.

    “Marinol is better than smokeable marijuana because Marinol does not
    contain the additional chemicals, impurities and hazards associated
    with smoke,” George said in a statement this month to the Senate.
    “Also, the resulting THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) blood levels and
    hence, the effects, are more predictable with Marinol than smokeable
    marijuana.”

    George said other drugs being developed would include THC, the main
    active component of marijuana. One drug is called Sativex, which if
    approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, could be used as a
    treatment for patients with advanced cancers.

    Approved in November by the FDA for clinical testing, the drug would
    be administered as an oral spray.

    “I’m telling you, as a former hospice physician, it is of no benefit
    to legalize smokeable marijuana,” George said.

    The FDA agrees.

    “There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for
    treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana,” the
    agency said in a statement in 2006.

    But Marinol, available since 1986, has its problems, said Ruth Hoppe,
    head of the Michigan chapter of the American College of Physicians,
    the nation’s second largest physicians group.

    Marinol is absorbed slowly into the body, she said, and a patient
    experiencing extreme nausea might not be able to use it because the
    pill must be swallowed to be effective.

    “We need to look at other routes of delivery,” Hoppe
    said.

    Potential for Abuse?

    Smoking anything is harmful to one’s health, Hoppe said. But that
    doesn’t mean marijuana doesn’t have its place as a legitimate medical
    treatment or supplement to other medications.

    The American College of Physicians recently released a position paper
    on medical marijuana. It concluded that, although more research needs
    to be done, “reports suggest numerous potential medical uses for marijuana.”

    “For patients with AIDS or those undergoing chemotherapy, who suffer
    severe pain, nausea and appetite loss, cannabinoid drugs may provide
    symptom relief not found in any other medication,” the position paper
    said.

    The federal government, however, puts marijuana in the same class as
    LSD, heroin, mescaline, psychedelic mushrooms and ecstasy.

    “Marijuana has a high potential for abuse, has no currently accepted
    medical use in treatment in the United States, and has a lack of
    accepted safety for use under medical supervision,” the 2006 FDA
    report said.

    The government’s classification of marijuana hinders study of the drug
    for medical use, Hoppe said. The American College of Physicians is
    recommending reclassifying the drug to allow for more study.

    “I can see a day when marijuana is seen as a legitimate medical
    treatment, especially in conjunction with other medications,” Hoppe
    said. “There is value in this drug.”

    ‘Trial and Error’ Doses

    Marinol comes in doses of 2.5 milligrams, 5 milligrams and 10
    milligrams. Determining the proper dose of marijuana from plants is
    less scientific because it can be smoked, drunk, eaten or inhaled
    through a vaporizer.

    Tooker, who is open to the medical uses for marijuana, said he opposes
    smoking it. He said “trial and error” would be the only way to
    determine what the appropriate dose of marijuana would be for a patient.

    Dianne Byrum, a former state legislator and spokeswoman for the
    Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care, said the dose level would
    depend on the patient’s needs and symptoms.

    “This would be a recommendation, not a prescription,” she
    said.

    She also said smoking marijuana would not be harmful, especially for
    patients with terminal conditions.

    [snip]

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.