• Cannabis & Hemp

    US CA: An Unlikely Evangelist for Legal Marijuana

    Pubdate: Sun, 13 Jun 2010
    Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
    Page: A – 1, Front Page
    Webpage: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/13/MN3N1DPDS1.DTL
    Copyright: 2010 Hearst Communications Inc.
    Contact: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/submissions/#1
    Website: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/388
    Author: Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer
    Cited: Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act http://www.taxcannabis.org/
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Richard+Lee
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Tax+Cannabis+Act
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis – California)

    AN UNLIKELY EVANGELIST FOR LEGAL MARIJUANA

    At first glance, Richard Lee looks nothing like a man who regularly
    smokes dope and spent his youth working with rock ‘n’ rap gods from
    Aerosmith to LL Cool J. Or who gunned his Harley up and down Texas
    highways as a young man, and has a will as stubborn as iron.

    He looks like, well, a quiet business yuppie. In a wheelchair. With
    tidy slacks and button-down shirt, short-cropped hair and a shy smile.

    Even cops trained to assess people are surprised – especially once
    they learn that this quiet guy is the champion for one of the most
    revolutionary social-change movements of our time, the legitimizing
    of marijuana.

    Lee’s latest effort is the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act on
    the Nov. 2 ballot, which would make California the first state to
    legalize recreational marijuana use. Its passage would notch the
    47-year-old Oakland man a spot in the annals of pot.

    Such notice wouldn’t be all that new for him. From hemp activism in
    Texas to building a cannabis university empire in Oakland, Lee has
    been a pioneer in the marijuana movement for 20 years – something
    that neither he nor his conservative Republican parents could have foreseen.

  • International

    Mexico: Despite Killing, Mexican Backs Drug Policy

    Pubdate: Mon, 14 Jun 2010
    Source: New York Times (NY)
    Page: A13
    Webpage: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/15/world/americas/15mexico.html
    Copyright: 2010 The New York Times Company
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.nytimes.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/298
    Author: Marc Lacey
    Cited: The presidential Website http://www.presidencia.gob.mx/
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Mexico
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Felipe+Calderon

    DESPITE KILLING, MEXICAN BACKS DRUG POLICY

    MEXICO CITY — Faced with a surge in drug-related killings in recent
    days, President Felipe Calderon on Monday offered a spirited defense
    of his government’s antidrug offensive.

    On Thursday night and Friday morning, attacks between rival drug
    trafficking organizations left 85 people dead in states across
    Mexico, according to newspaper tallies, making it the bloodiest
    24-hour period in Mr. Calderon’s three-year-old presidency.

    Mr. Calderon responded with his most extensive defense of his
    administration’s drug war, a 5,000-word missive published on the
    presidential Web site and in local newspapers that shifted some blame
    for violence to previous administrations and to the United States and
    insisted that backing down was not an option.

    “If we remain with our arms crossed, we will remain in the hands of
    organized crime, we will always live in fear, our children will not
    have a future, violence will increase and we’ll lose our freedom,”
    Mr. Calderon wrote.

    On Monday, as television and radio commentators analyzed the
    president’s statement, authorities announced another bad day, with 10
    federal police officers killed and more than a dozen others wounded
    in a clash with traffickers in Zitacuaro, a town in the central state
    of Michoacan. The gunmen, some of whom died as well, used buses to
    close off major highways and obstruct reinforcements by the
    authorities, an increasingly common tactic employed by Mexico’s drug cartels.

    In another episode on Monday, 28 inmates were killed and 3 guards
    were wounded in an uprising led by detained traffickers in a prison
    in Mazatlan, in the Pacific state of Sinaloa, authorities said.

    The president, elected in 2006 to a six-year term, also condemned the
    huge demand for drugs and the easy availability of guns in the United States.

    “It is as though we have a neighbor next door who is the biggest
    addict in the world, with the added fact that everyone wants to sell
    drugs through our house,” Mr. Calderon said.

  • Drug Policy

    US: Justices Ease Deportation Rule in Minor Drug Cases

    Pubdate: Tue, 15 Jun 2010
    Source: New York Times (NY)
    Page: A20
    Webpage: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/15/us/15scotus.html
    Copyright: 2010 The New York Times Company
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.nytimes.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/298
    Author: Adam Liptak
    Referenced: the Supreme Court decision
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/09-60.pdf
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/deportation

    JUSTICES EASE DEPORTATION RULE IN MINOR DRUG CASES

    WASHINGTON — Immigrants who are legally in the United States need
    not be automatically deported for minor drug offenses, the Supreme
    Court ruled Monday in a unanimous decision.

    Lower courts had said that Jose Angel Carachuri-Rosendo, a permanent
    resident of the United States who had lived here since 1983, when he
    was 5, was subject to mandatory deportation for a second drug
    offense, this one involving possession of single tablet of a prescription drug.

    The question in the case was whether that second offense amounted to
    an “aggravated felony.” If it did, the government had no choice but
    to deport him under the immigration laws. If it did not, the attorney
    general had the discretion to show leniency.

    In 2004, Mr. Carachuri-Rosendo was sentenced by a Texas state court
    judge to 20 days in jail for possession of less than two ounces of
    marijuana. The next year, he was sentenced to 10 days in jail for
    having a single tablet of Xanax, an anti-anxiety drug, without a prescription.

    Those were both misdemeanors under state law. But federal authorities
    argued that a second drug offense counted as an aggravated felony
    under federal law, making Mr. Carachuri-Rosendo ineligible for
    discretionary relief from deportation.

    Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for seven justices, said the
    interactions of the various state and federal laws in the case
    required analysis of a “maze of statutory cross-references” and a
    2006 decision, Lopez v. Gonzales, that rooted the definition of
    “aggravated felony” in federal law even when state offenses were involved.

    At bottom, Justice Stevens wrote, “a 10-day sentence for the
    unauthorized possession of a trivial amount of a prescription drug”
    is at odds with the ordinary meaning of “aggravated felony,” even if
    federal prosecutors could, in theory, have sought a two-year sentence
    in federal court for the second drug offense.

    “Carachuri-Rosendo, and others in his position, may now seek
    cancellation of removal and thereby avoid the harsh consequence of
    mandatory removal,” Justice Stevens wrote. But “any relief he may
    obtain depends upon the discretion of the attorney general.”

    Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, in separate
    concurrences, voted with the majority but declined to adopt its
    reasoning in the case, Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, No. 09-60.

    [snip]

  • Announcements

    New Directions Conference:A Public Health and Safety Approach to

    New Directions Conference, June 17 in Washington, DC: A Public Health and Safety Approach to Drugs

    Leaders in Public Health, Law Enforcement, Treatment and Criminal Justice Reform will Meet to Chart a Public Health Course to Address Drug Use

    An unprecedented collection of service providers, law enforcement officials, public health and community advocates will come together to chart a new course in U.S. drug policy at the *New Directions Conference* on Thursday, June 17 in Washington, DC. The event will take place from 8:45 a.m.-5 p.m., in Room B338 of the Rayburn House Office Building.

    Drug policy experts from across the country will address strategies for expanding treatment, coordinating prevention and enforcement, implementing overdose prevention and other harm reduction measures during the day-long conference.

    When asked about the war on drugs on the campaign trail President Barack Obama said, “I believe in shifting the paradigm, shifting the model, so that we focus more on a public health approach [to drugs].” Polls show the American people agree. President Obama’s drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, told the Wall Street Journal last year that he doesn’t like the term “war on drugs” because “[w]e’re not at war with people in this country.” Yet for the tens of millions of Americans who have been arrested and incarcerated for a drug offense, U.S. drug policy is a war on them—and their families. What exactly is a public health approach to drugs? What might truly ending the war on drugs look like?

  • Drug Policy - Question of the Week

    Can heroin be used to treat heroin addiction?

    Drug Policy Question of the Week – 6-9-10

    As answered by Mary Jane Borden, Editor of Drug War Facts for the Drug Truth Network on 6-6-10. http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/2930

    Question of the Week: Can heroin be used to treat heroin addiction?

    First, a look at the numbers finds that there were approximately 213,000 current users of heroin in the United States in 2008, with current users defined as those who had used the drug in the last month. This kind of use is medically defined as chronic.

    The two physicians looked into heroin addiction in the 2004 Archives of Internal Medicine article entitled, “Treating Opioid Dependence.” They pointed to a scientific basis for heroin addiction by postulating,

    “Chronic heroin abusers end up with an endogenous opioid deficiency because of down-regulation of opioid production. This creates an overwhelming craving.”

    Three synthetic opiates — Methadone, Levomethadyl, and Buprenorphine – have been developed as chronic maintenance therapies to overcome this down regulation and the consequent cravings.

    Very recently – in fact just last week – the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, contained an article and commentary concerning the

    “scientific evidence base [that] is emerging to support the effectiveness of maintenance treatment with directly supervised medicinal heroin as a secondline treatment for chronic heroin addiction.”

    Heroin maintenance is targeted toward the

    “5-10% of heroin addicts who fail to benefit from established conventional treatments.”

    Moreover, studies have shown that,

    “treatment with supervised injectable heroin leads to significantly lower use of street heroin than does supervised injectable methadone or optimised oral methadone.”

    Commenting on heroin maintenance, The Lancet concluded,

    “The existing interference and non-evidence-based opposition from politicians and care providers, who refuse to acknowledge the limitations of methadone maintenance and the superiority of prescribed heroin in selected populations, is arguably unethical. Denying effective second-line therapy to those in need ultimately serves to condemn many users of illicit heroin to the all too common outcomes of untreated heroin addiction, including HIV infection or death from overdose.”

    These facts and others like them come from the Heroin and Heroin Maintenance chapters of Drug War Facts.

    Questions concerning these or other facts concerning drug policy can be e-mailed to [email protected].

  • Letter Writer of the Month

    Letter Writer Of The Month

    LETTER WRITER OF THE MONTH – MAY

    DrugSense recognizes Brett Book of Hamilton, Ontario for his three letters published during May, bringing his career total that we know of to seven.

    You may read his published letters by clicking this link: http://www.mapinc.org/writers/Brett+Book

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    LETTER OF THE WEEK

    D.A.R.E.  PROGRAM

    I am writing in response to your article about the “Council unveils cuts to budget” on the June 2 front page.  I feel like you are misrepresenting the facts about Emily Naeole-Beason’s budget cut request.  The D.A.R.E.  program is not an educational program.  It is a propaganda program aimed at young schoolchildren.  The police are spreading misinformation and what happens is once the children learn that the police lie about drugs, they cannot trust them about other issues.

    The D.A.R.E.  program has been cited as being ineffective by the U.S.  Department of Education, in addition to the U.S.  Surgeon General and the U.S.  General Accountability Office.  The DOE has banned federal funding of the D.A.R.E.  program in school.  I feel you need to print a correction immediately stating the truth about the D.A.R.E.  program.  And I, for one, am personally thankful to Emily for standing up to end this wasteful use of county funds.  The police should be here to protect and serve us, not lobby for the perpetuation of the “Drug War.”

    Sara Steiner

    Pahoa

    Pubdate: Fri, 4 Jun 2010

    Source: Hawaii Tribune Herald (Hilo, HI)

  • Focus Alerts

    #439 ‘Prince Of Pot’ Is At A Low

    Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010
    Subject: #439 ‘Prince Of Pot’ Is At A Low

    ‘PRINCE OF POT’ IS AT A LOW

    **********************************************************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #439 – Saturday, 12 Jun 2010

    Former DEA administrator Karen Tandy in a press release on the day of
    Marc Emery’s arrest, July 29th, 2005, stated:

    “Today’s DEA arrest of Marc Scott Emery, publisher of Cannabis Culture
    magazine, and the founder of a marijuana legalization group, is a
    significant blow not only to the marijuana trafficking trade in the
    U.S. and Canada, but also to the marijuana legalization movement….
    Drug legalization lobbyists now have one less pot of money to rely
    on.”

    Philanthropist Marc Emery funneled millions of dollars in resources
    and funds to the marijuana legalization movement on both sides of the
    border.

    Today the Los Angeles Times published a front page article about
    Marc.

    To read current and future press items about Marc please use this
    link: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Marc+Emery

    Your letters to the editor are always helpful.

    An anonymous donor has challenged DrugSense and MAP to raise $25,000
    in new donations and/or increases in current periodic donations. Once
    the goal is achieved the donor will provide us with $25,000. Today we
    are about two thirds of the way to this very important goal. Please
    help us meet the challenge! http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm

    **********************************************************************

    Pubdate: Sat, 12 Jun 2010

    Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)

    Page: Front Page, continued on page A14 and A15

    Copyright: 2010 Los Angeles Times

    Contact: http://mapinc.org/url/bc7El3Yo

    Author: Kim Murphy, reporting from Vancouver, Canada

    Column One

    ‘PRINCE OF POT’ IS AT A LOW

    The Canadian Thought His Profitable Seed Sales Could Upend the U.S.
    War on Drugs. But Now He Is Stuck Behind Bars in Seattle.

    For years, his seed catalogs were scrutinized by discerning cannabis
    cultivators across the U.S. and Canada, much like the ladies of
    Cumbria might fuss over Chiltern’s inventories of sweet peas and
    heirloom tomatoes.

    There was Blue Heaven pot, capable of producing a “euphoric,
    anti-anxiety high,” or Crown Royal, whose “flower tops come to a flat
    golden crown, sparkling with gems of THC,” or Hawaiian Sativa, with
    its “menthol flavor that tingles the taste buds and tickles the brain.”

    The difference between Marc Emery’s pot seeds and countless others on
    the market was that if you bought Emery’s, he’d use the money to
    launch a cannabis tsunami across North America that would set the war
    on drugs adrift like a cork on a massive sea of weed.

    “Plant the seeds of freedom, overgrow the government,” Emery urged his
    clients. With a pot plant on every patio, he declared, violent drug
    gangs would see their livelihoods disappear and police would be
    reduced to “running around … chasing all these marijuana plants.”

    Sooner or later, he promised, “they will simply give up and change the
    laws.”

    Well, not yet. Emery, who U.S. authorities fingered in 2005 as one of
    the top 46 international drug trafficking targets, was ordered
    extradited by the Canadian minister of justice last month and
    relinquished to federal marshals in Seattle. He now faces a likely
    five years in U.S. federal prison.

    “In fact I have done these things, so I admit my guilt,” Emery said in
    an e-mail after pleading guilty in U.S. District Court to one count of
    conspiracy to manufacture marijuana. “We are winning, especially in
    the United States, and I can take a lot of credit for that…. When I
    am gone, or even locked up here in the U.S., my historical legacy is
    secure.”

    Here in “Vansterdam,” where cannabis cafes, head shops and even a
    supervised needle-injection site are prominent features of downtown,
    pot is a multibillion-dollar industry. And Emery, a longtime fixture
    at political forums and downtown street rallies, is widely seen as one
    of its titans.

    The extradition of the 52-year-old self-proclaimed “Prince of Pot” has
    sparked a sovereignty outcry across Canada, where supporters, civil
    rights advocates and even several members of parliament have demanded
    to know why he was handed over to the U.S. for an offense that Canada
    seldom prosecutes.

    “It seems like the American war on drugs is just reaching its arm into
    Canada and saying, ‘We’re going to scoop you up,'” said Libby Davies,
    a member of parliament from Vancouver. “The whole thing has struck
    people as being over the top, harsh, unwarranted – and at the end of
    the day, what are they trying to prove?”

    Canada and the U.S. have been on strangely opposite political
    trajectories when it comes to the war on drugs.

    As early as 2003, the Canadian government appeared poised to
    decriminalize marijuana, which is regulated only federally in Canada,
    but backed down under U.S. threats to throw up punitive border controls.

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party since 2006 has
    backed a series of bills, one now pending in parliament, that would
    mirror widely criticized U.S. policies and impose for the first time a
    mandatory six-month jail term on anyone convicted of growing six or
    more marijuana plants.

    The U.S., meanwhile, is moving under the Obama administration toward a
    stronger focus on prevention and treatment. Fourteen states now allow
    medical use of marijuana, and California voters will decide in
    November on an initiative that would decriminalize adult possession of
    up to an ounce of marijuana and allow small-scale cultivation for
    personal consumption.

    Emery became a target for police in both nations – in Canada because
    his frequent appearances on international television shows was an
    irritant to police; in America because his seed business, which at one
    point reached revenues of $3 million a year, was supplying
    marijuana-growing operations in at least nine states.

    “Marc Emery happened to be the largest supplier of marijuana seeds
    into the United States,” said Todd Greenberg, the assistant U.S.
    attorney in Seattle who is prosecuting Emery’s case.

    Emery believes he caught the eye of the Drug Enforcement
    Administration not because of his seeds but because of what he did
    with his revenue. Living in a rented apartment with no car and few
    personal possessions, Emery channeled most of the millions he earned
    into marijuana legalization and defense efforts across North America.

    The Prince of Pot’s seed money has helped start “compassion clubs” for
    medical-marijuana users across Canada, launch the Pot-TV Internet
    network, and fund lobbying organizations and political parties in
    North America, Israel and New Zealand.

    Many of the state campaigns to legalize the medical use of marijuana
    in the U.S. did so with donations from Emery. He ran for mayor of
    Vancouver in 1996, 2002 and 2008, finishing a perennial fourth or fifth.

    “When Marc was arrested, he had $11 in his bank account,” said his
    wife, Jodie, 25, who has co-edited Emery’s magazine, Cannabis Culture,
    and served as his deputy in the Marijuana Party of British Columbia,
    which he founded. The party took 3.5% of the vote in the 2000
    elections and made cannabis a must-address issue in every election
    since.

    Emery won few friends in President George W. Bush’s administration
    when former drug czar John Walters, apparently seeking to stamp out
    rumblings of marijuana decriminalization among Canada’s then-ruling
    Liberal Party, addressed the Vancouver Board of Trade in 2002.

    Emery surreptitiously bought a table at the event, and along with
    fellow activists David Malmo-Levine and Chris Bennett, heckled Walters
    mercilessly. The next day, activists blew marijuana smoke in Walters’
    face during a tour of downtown

    Not long after that, they figure, is when the U.S. investigation of
    Emery was launched. But his friends say that only increased his sense
    of mission – and self-esteem.

    “A lot of people take great offense when he gets compared to people
    like Martin Luther King and Gandhi, and they say, ‘Marc, you can’t
    compare yourself to someone like that.’ And he says, ‘These are men
    who stood up for things … who suffered for what they represented,
    and to many, many people, they were the leader of their movement,'”
    Jodie said.

    “Marc does have a gigantic ego,” she said.

    “Majestic,” said Malmo-Levine.

    Cannabis has been Emery’s holy grail, but it would be a mistake, his
    friends say, to think of him as a pothead weaned on tree-hugging and
    the Grateful Dead. To the contrary, he is a libertarian capitalist
    whose politics lean free-market, individual-rights Republican.

    “A lot of people think he’s a leftie, but he’s really a true
    conservative. He wants to get the government out of people’s lives,”
    his wife said.

    As a 17-year-old high school dropout in London, Ontario, he opened his
    own bookstore, City Lights, in 1975, and clashed with the authorities
    there for selling banned copies of High Times magazine and the rap
    group 2 Live Crew’s forbidden CD “As Nasty as They Wanna Be.”

    Emery was arrested not only for selling banned material but for
    repeatedly defying the province’s Sunday closure laws; after years of
    conflict, he moved to Vancouver, where he hooked up with local hemp
    activists who shared his growing fascination with the history of
    cannabis and the governmental campaigns against it.

    “‘Where, oh where, are the hemp professionals?’ He totally slammed all
    these guys in dreadlocks,” Bennett recalled. “I’d say, ‘Who are you to
    criticize anybody? Are you going to get pot legalized?’ And he said,
    ‘Just watch me.'”

    Emery opened his pot paraphernalia store, BC Hemp, in 1994 and started
    up his seed business later that year. Over the years he has been
    arrested more than a dozen times, whether for selling seeds in
    Vancouver or passing a joint in Saskatoon, but hasn’t faced serious
    jail time until now.

    His seed business, he has argued, did more good than harm by
    undermining the criminal cartels that have turned marijuana
    trafficking into a corrupt and violent international business.

    “What I did was make it possible for small home growers to produce
    their own made-in-the-U.S.A. marijuana,” he said. “I stopped millions
    of American dollars from flowing to terrorists, cartels, thugs and
    gangs.”

    The mainstream marijuana legalization movement in the United States,
    however, has been largely silent since his arrest, not lending their
    voices, for example, to the rallies in nearly 80 cities around the
    world that followed Emery’s transfer to the U.S.

    It was largely alone that Emery sat in a Seattle courtroom late last
    month, with only a handful of supporters on the benches.

    He had agreed to plead guilty to the single count of conspiracy to
    manufacture marijuana, Jodie said, largely to ensure that his two
    employees also charged in the indictment would not have to serve jail
    time.

    “It was the most preferable of all the alternatives,” a subdued Emery
    told Judge Ricardo S. Martinez, who asked why he was admitting to the
    charge.

    “Sometimes there are no alternatives, you’re right,” the judge said.
    “There are only bad and worse.”

    Emery was led away not long after that, but nobody really expected
    he’d go quietly.

    The Prince of Pot’s blog posts from the SeaTac detention center go out
    regularly on the Internet to his supporters. What he wants to do next,
    though his attempt to get a recorded phone call out has so far only
    gotten him stuck in solitary confinement: Potcasts.

    **********************************************************************

    Suggestions for writing letters are at our Media Activism Center
    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    The cannabis section of Drug War Facts has been extensively updated
    http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/node/53

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake www.mapinc.org

    =.

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    D.A.R.E. PROGRAM

    I am writing in response to your article about the “Council unveils
    cuts to budget” on the June 2 front page. I feel like you are
    misrepresenting the facts about Emily Naeole-Beason’s budget cut
    request. The D.A.R.E. program is not an educational program. It is
    a propaganda program aimed at young schoolchildren. The police are
    spreading misinformation and what happens is once the children learn
    that the police lie about drugs, they cannot trust them about other issues.

    The D.A.R.E. program has been cited as being ineffective by the
    U.S. Department of Education, in addition to the U.S. Surgeon
    General and the U.S. General Accountability Office. The DOE has
    banned federal funding of the D.A.R.E. program in school. I feel
    you need to print a correction immediately stating the truth about
    the D.A.R.E. program. And I, for one, am personally thankful to
    Emily for standing up to end this wasteful use of county funds. The
    police should be here to protect and serve us, not lobby for the
    perpetuation of the “Drug War.”

    Sara Steiner

    Pahoa

    Pubdate: Fri, 4 Jun 2010

    Source: Hawaii Tribune Herald (Hilo, HI)