• Focus Alerts

    #364 Congress Does Something Right – Special Interests Scream

    Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008
    Subject: #364 Congress Does Something Right – Special Interests Scream

    CONGRESS DOES SOMETHING RIGHT – SPECIAL INTERESTS SCREAM

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #363 – Sunday, 30 March 2008

    President Bush, whose administration has long expressed the opinion
    that federal dollars should not be the primary means of funding state
    and local law enforcement, has dramatically cut funding in the 2009
    budget for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants, the
    primary program used to finance drug enforcement in nearly every state
    for more than 20 years.

    In FY 2007, the Byrne program was funded at $520 million. For FY 2008
    — which starts on October 1st, 2008 — the Senate had originally
    funded the Byrne program at $660 million and the House at $600 million
    in their respective appropriations bills. However, in the omnibus FY
    2008 appropriations bill signed into law in December 2007, the Byrne
    program funding was cut to $170 million for the coming year — a 67
    percent decrease from 2007 funding levels. The cuts will devastate
    state law enforcement efforts by shutting down multi-jurisdictional
    drug task forces, requiring layoffs of police and prosecutors.

    Since there is no way to measure where the underground drug industry
    is most active, the grants have always been a prime pork-barrel way
    for members of Congress to help their districts. As Congress returns
    to session this week efforts to restore the full grant funding will
    continue.

    As news clippings from this year in the MAP archives show, with new
    clippings being added frequently, law enforcement and elected
    officials at all levels are in a panic about the possible loss of funds. See:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Byrne

    Some of the articles indicate that the grant funds have caught some
    bad folks who, perhaps, deserve to be caught. Of course the articles
    are not likely to tell you about the busts of marijuana users,
    including medicinal users, which have been funded at least in part by
    the grants. None of the news about police corruption or drug raids
    gone bad are likely to be tied to Byrne grant funds, as they often
    are. Remember Tulia, Texas? That was Byrne grant money at work.

    Please contact your members of Congress to let them know what you
    think about fully funding the Byrne grant program. The ‘Find and
    contact your federal, state, and local officials.’ box in the upper
    left corner of this webpage makes it easy. http://www.congress.org/

    OMB Watch has produced a report for the last available year, FY 2006,
    which has amazing data. See which of your representatives in Congress
    were able to secure the most Byrne funds for their district, and much
    more at http://drugsense.org/url/SezrJZJY

    Letters to the Editor about Byrne grant funding are, of course, always
    appropriate.

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #362 Medical Marijuana In Michigan – Yea Or Nay?

    Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008
    Subject: #362 Medical Marijuana In Michigan – Yea Or Nay?

    MEDICAL MARIJUANA IN MICHIGAN – YEA OR NAY?

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #362 – Monday, 24 March 2008

    Earlier this month, the voters of Michigan succeeded in qualifying an
    initiative for the November election ballot. When passed by the voters
    on November 4th Michigan law will allow patients to use, possess, and
    grow their own marijuana for medical purposes with their doctors’
    approval. This will likely make Michigan the first medical marijuana
    state in the heartland, although there are bills pending in some other
    midwest states. Michigan is home to more than 10 million people. Of
    the states with current effective medical marijuana laws only
    California has a larger population.

    Three articles were written for the Sunday editions of the Kalamazoo
    Gazette this month, a newspaper in the heartland of Michigan. They
    illustrate the battle Michigan folks will have in the media in the
    months ahead. The author of the articles, Chris Killian, went to some
    length to find both pro and con arguments.

    Please read the articles at http://www.mapinc.org/author/Chris+Killian
    Note that for the two oldest articles Michigan letter writers have
    responded as shown at the ‘Letters’ link at the top of each MAP
    archived article.

    We are not suggesting that out of state letter writers respond to
    Michigan press articles about the initiative. This is a battle best
    fought by in state letter writers.

    Folks outside Michigan may find other ways to support the initiative
    by going to the initiative website at http://stoparrestingpatients.org/

    But the three articles do illustrate the type of arguments made in the
    press both for and against medicinal marijuana initiatives, bills and
    laws in every state. As letter writers improve their arguments in
    letters sent to their state papers they advance the issue.

    **********************************************************************

    Excerpts from ‘Nuclear-Blast Survivor Heads Veterans for Medical
    Marijuana Access’ published on March 9th:

    The atomic explosions off remote islands in the South Pacific seemed
    to turn night into day.

    They also turned Martin Chilcutt into a marijuana user.

    Chilcutt said the drug has helped him to ease the pain he says dates
    back to his exposure to radiation during a 1956 U.S. government
    project testing nuclear and thermonuclear weapons.

    A state ballot proposal could allow voters in November to decide
    whether Chilcutt’s measures to self-medicate should be legal in Michigan.

    The 74-year-old former intelligence officer with the U.S. Naval Air
    Force has used other medications to help him with his physical and
    psychological problems, but marijuana helps “so much better,” he said.

    [snip]

    Although there are different ways to use the drug, such as ingesting
    or inhaling it, there is no difference in the drug’s effect based on
    consumption, according to the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate
    Care, which is spearheading the state marijuana initiative.

    “It just makes life so much easier,” he said. “It allows you to be
    comfortable.”

    Chilcutt, a retired psychotherapist, said he first learned of
    marijuana’s medical benefits in the late 1970s while counseling
    Vietnam War veterans in California. They told him the drug could help
    allay his pain, he said.

    He said he takes eight other medications for ailments the marijuana
    doesn’t help, including a thyroid condition.

    Advocates for the medical use of marijuana say it’s also effective in
    easing symptoms from other serious illnesses such as HIV/AIDS,
    glaucoma and multiple sclerosis.

    Critics cite a U.S. Food and Drug Administration report in 2006 that
    said “no sound scientific studies” support the medical use of the drug.

    If the marijuana-use proposal is approved by state voters, Michigan
    would become the 15th state — and the first in the Midwest — with a
    law that permits marijuana use for seriously ill people. Michigan law
    currently prohibits marijuana use for any reason.

    It’s estimated between 40,000 and 50,000 people — about one-half of 1
    percent of Michigan residents — would be eligible to use marijuana
    for medical purposes. In states where the law is now in place, it’s
    estimated the same percentage of residents would qualify to use the
    drug, according to the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care.

    [snip]

    **********************************************************************

    The article ‘Most Area Lawmakers Oppose Marijuana As Medical
    Treatment’ published March 16th:

    For five years, state Sen. Tom George worked for Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo, sometimes prescribing a synthetic form of marijuana called
    Marinol to help ease a person’s pain or discomfort.

    But George, an anesthesiologist, opposes a ballot proposal that seeks
    to legalize marijuana use in Michigan for those seriously ill.

    State Rep. Fulton Sheen, a conservative Republican, opposed
    medical-marijuana use until he heard testimony from people who said
    they got relief from debilitating conditions by using the drug.

    He now supports the initiative, which could appear on the Nov. 4
    ballot.

    Of southwestern Michigan’s 10 state lawmakers, seven said they oppose
    legalizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

    Joining George, R-Texas Township, were state Sens. Patricia Birkholz,
    R-Saugatuck; Cameron Brown, R-Sturgis; and Ron Jelinek, R-Three Oaks;
    and state Reps. Jack Hoogendyk, R-Texas Township; Tonya Schuitmaker,
    R-Lawton; and Rick Shaffer, R-Three Rivers. Such an initiative, they
    think, could lead to more crime and abuse among nonmedical marijuana
    users and could be the first step to complete legalization of marijuana.

    “Marijuana is illegal for a reason,” Jelinek said. “Its legalization,
    even for medical reasons, would denigrate our society eventually.
    (Using marijuana) is akin to a self-induced mental illness.”

    State Reps. Robert Jones, D-Kalamazoo, and Sheen, R-Plainwell, support
    the initiative. They said those seriously ill should have marijuana as
    a treatment option if it helps and is properly regulated.

    “The right story needs to be told by the right people,” Jones said.
    “We can’t be afraid of this as a society. Marijuana is a legitimate
    treatment for those suffering from serious diseases.”

    State Rep. Lorence Wenke, R-Galesburg, said he is undecided on the
    medical-marijuana initiative.

    “These are the types of proposals that politicians run from,” Wenke
    said. “It’s a very intense issue.”

    Bill Ballenger, a Lansing-based political analyst and editor of Inside
    Michigan Politics, said it’s easier for the Legislature to choose to
    not act on the initiative and allow voters to decide its fate. Leaders
    from the Senate and House have said they don’t expect legislative
    action on the proposal. Gov. Jennifer Granholm opposes it.

    “Finding a legislator who forms a gutsy position on issues like
    medical marijuana, like supporting it, is difficult,” said Ballenger,
    adding he expects voters to pass the ballot initiative.

    Change of Heart

    Sheen said he was skeptical about supporting marijuana use for medical
    needs until he heard testimony from people who said it helped ease
    their suffering.

    The 2006 hearing was held on a bill that was similar to the current
    ballot initiative. The measure never got out of a House committee.

    “As I listened to their testimony and heard how (marijuana) had helped
    them, my mind began to change,” Sheen said. “Now I look at (marijuana)
    as a kind of prescription drug for those who are very sick. And if it
    alleviates symptoms, isn’t that what a prescription drug is supposed
    to do?”

    In the 1990s Sheen’s brother, who had contracted AIDS, was dying. In
    the final months of his life he smoked marijuana, which helped him to
    breathe and swallow easier, Sheen said.

    “Although I didn’t agree with what he was doing at the time, it helped
    him,” Sheen said. “But now my mind has been changed.”

    But George, who worked from 1996 to 2001 at Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo, said the active ingredient in marijuana —
    tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC — is already available in pill form.
    Although George admits many patients to whom he prescribed Marinol
    responded favorably, marijuana — even in synthetic form — should not
    be “a front-line treatment,” he said.

    “What is the additional benefit of legalizing marijuana?” George said.
    “And even with the Marinol, it should play a small role in any treatment.”

    Potential for Abuse

    It’s estimated about one-half of 1 percent of Michigan residents,
    between 40,000 and 50,000 people, would be eligible for
    medical-marijuana use.

    “There is such widespread use of marijuana that having a very few
    patients use it legally isn’t that big of a problem,” Jones said.

    Other area legislators disagree.

    “Everybody’s going to have a backache,” Jelinek said of the potential
    for people faking chronic pain or other serious health problems.

    Schuitmaker said she “sympathizes with suffering individuals,” but
    still can’t support the initiative.

    “This would be legalizing a drug that has had a detrimental effect on
    society and be the first step to the legalization of marijuana for
    nonmedical uses,” she said. “It’s a slippery slope.”

    The proposal calls for registered medical users to keep the marijuana
    in a secure, locked location. Users who give or sell their marijuana
    to those who are not authorized to have it could be subject to stiff
    fines and possible jail time. Users also would have to register
    themselves with the state and carry a state-issued ID card indicating
    they are a registered medical user.

    Even with such controls, some lawmakers question how effective
    enforcement and regulation will be, especially if the number of
    medical marijuana users increases.

    “There are other options out there for very sick people (besides
    marijuana). By not supporting this, it’s not like we’re denying a
    dying patient relief,” said Hoogendyk, who recently announced he will
    challenge Democratic Sen. Carl Levin in the U.S. Senate.

    **********************************************************************

    Excerpt from ‘Debate Continues Whether Risks of Medical Marijuana
    Outweigh the Benefits’ published March 23rd:

    The chief medical officer of Kalamazoo County might use marijuana to
    alleviate the pain of his glaucoma — if it were legal.

    In 2000, Richard Tooker, 54, was diagnosed with pigmentary glaucoma, a
    rare eye disease where fluid buildup inside the eye can lead to
    intense pain. Blindness is also possible.

    “I would consider taking it, if it were legal, for medical use,” he
    said. “I want to keep my vision.”

    Studies have shown marijuana can lessen pressure in the eyes of those
    with glaucoma.

    Tooker said he would have to consult with legal counsel before he used
    the drug. That’s because, even if Michigan voters in November decide
    to allow medical marijuana use by seriously ill patients, it still
    would be illegal under federal law.

    Users of medical marijuana, as well as others who support its use, say
    the drug offers relief to those suffering debilitating conditions.
    They also say it would be cheaper than buying the drug off the street
    and that use and production can be controlled if properly regulated.

    But questions remain.

    How would the appropriate dose be established for those who are deemed
    eligible users? Are there possible negative health effects from using
    the drug for medical reasons? Do alternatives to medical marijuana
    already exist?

    “On the balance, it’s a good thing,” Tooker said of medical marijuana.
    “And if we’re going to legalize marijuana for medical use in Michigan,
    let’s legalize it across the country. It’s a dicey, difficult issue.”

    State Sen. Tom George, R-Texas Township, worked for Hospice of Greater
    Kalamazoo and sometimes prescribed a synthetic — and legal – — form
    of marijuana called Marinol.

    But the drug is not cheap.

    [snip]

    George, an anesthesiologist, opposes the ballot initiative because of
    the availability of Marinol and the possible health risks of medical
    marijuana.

    “Marinol is better than smokeable marijuana because Marinol does not
    contain the additional chemicals, impurities and hazards associated
    with smoke,” George said in a statement this month to the Senate.
    “Also, the resulting THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) blood levels and
    hence, the effects, are more predictable with Marinol than smokeable
    marijuana.”

    George said other drugs being developed would include THC, the main
    active component of marijuana. One drug is called Sativex, which if
    approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, could be used as a
    treatment for patients with advanced cancers.

    Approved in November by the FDA for clinical testing, the drug would
    be administered as an oral spray.

    “I’m telling you, as a former hospice physician, it is of no benefit
    to legalize smokeable marijuana,” George said.

    The FDA agrees.

    “There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for
    treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana,” the
    agency said in a statement in 2006.

    But Marinol, available since 1986, has its problems, said Ruth Hoppe,
    head of the Michigan chapter of the American College of Physicians,
    the nation’s second largest physicians group.

    Marinol is absorbed slowly into the body, she said, and a patient
    experiencing extreme nausea might not be able to use it because the
    pill must be swallowed to be effective.

    “We need to look at other routes of delivery,” Hoppe
    said.

    Potential for Abuse?

    Smoking anything is harmful to one’s health, Hoppe said. But that
    doesn’t mean marijuana doesn’t have its place as a legitimate medical
    treatment or supplement to other medications.

    The American College of Physicians recently released a position paper
    on medical marijuana. It concluded that, although more research needs
    to be done, “reports suggest numerous potential medical uses for marijuana.”

    “For patients with AIDS or those undergoing chemotherapy, who suffer
    severe pain, nausea and appetite loss, cannabinoid drugs may provide
    symptom relief not found in any other medication,” the position paper
    said.

    The federal government, however, puts marijuana in the same class as
    LSD, heroin, mescaline, psychedelic mushrooms and ecstasy.

    “Marijuana has a high potential for abuse, has no currently accepted
    medical use in treatment in the United States, and has a lack of
    accepted safety for use under medical supervision,” the 2006 FDA
    report said.

    The government’s classification of marijuana hinders study of the drug
    for medical use, Hoppe said. The American College of Physicians is
    recommending reclassifying the drug to allow for more study.

    “I can see a day when marijuana is seen as a legitimate medical
    treatment, especially in conjunction with other medications,” Hoppe
    said. “There is value in this drug.”

    ‘Trial and Error’ Doses

    Marinol comes in doses of 2.5 milligrams, 5 milligrams and 10
    milligrams. Determining the proper dose of marijuana from plants is
    less scientific because it can be smoked, drunk, eaten or inhaled
    through a vaporizer.

    Tooker, who is open to the medical uses for marijuana, said he opposes
    smoking it. He said “trial and error” would be the only way to
    determine what the appropriate dose of marijuana would be for a patient.

    Dianne Byrum, a former state legislator and spokeswoman for the
    Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care, said the dose level would
    depend on the patient’s needs and symptoms.

    “This would be a recommendation, not a prescription,” she
    said.

    She also said smoking marijuana would not be harmful, especially for
    patients with terminal conditions.

    [snip]

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #361 Use Medical Marijuana – Lose Your Job

    Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008
    Subject: #361 Use Medical Marijuana – Lose Your Job

    USE MEDICAL MARIJUANA – LOSE YOUR JOB

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #361 – Sunday, 27 Jan 2008

    In the latest blow to medical marijuana rights, the California Supreme
    Court ruled Thursday that employers can fire workers who test positive
    for the drug, even when it is used under a physician’s advice.

    “Nothing in the text or history of the Compassionate Use Act suggests
    the voters intended the measure to address the respective rights and
    duties of employers and employees,” wrote Justice Kathryn Mickle
    Werdegar in the 15-page opinion. “Under California law, an employer
    may require pre-employment drug tests and take illegal drug use into
    consideration in making employment decisions…. The Compassionate Use
    Act does not eliminate marijuana’s potential for abuse or the
    employer’s legitimate interest in whether an employee uses the drug.”
    The decision is on line here: http://drugsense.org/url/NDVd3p20lJ

    “The majority’s holding disrespects the will of California’s voters,”
    wrote Justice Joyce L. Kennard, whose dissent was joined by Justice
    Carlos R. Moreno, calling the decision “conspicuously lacking in
    compassion.” The voters “surely never intended that persons who
    availed themselves” of the medical marijuana act “would thereby
    disqualify themselves from employment.” Kennard wrote.

    Thus five of the seven justices – who will never face a drug test –
    showed their contempt for the people of California.

    Daily newspapers throughout California, as well as major national
    newspapers, covered the story. Please write letters to the editor to
    your local newspapers giving your views about the decision. A sample
    of the coverage may be found at this link:

    http://www.mapinc.org/topic/RagingWire

    **********************************************************************

    Style guides for writing effective letters to the editor are
    available at MAP’s Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    **********************************************************************

    Please Send Us a Copy of Your Letter

    Please send copies of your letters to the sent letter list (
    [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or email a copy to
    [email protected] if you are not subscribed.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent letters and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see:

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #360 John Walters Caught Lying – Again

    Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008
    Subject: #360 John Walters Caught Lying – Again

    JOHN WALTERS CAUGHT LYING – AGAIN

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #360 – Thursday, 24 Jan 2008

    One of the U.S. government’s most persistently dishonest appointed
    officials – John Walters, the Director of the Office of National Drug
    Control Policy (ONDCP) – has been caught in yet another outright lie
    to the North American media.

    His office’s first major press release of 2008 made a disturbing
    announcement. According to Drug Czar Walters, there is a “dangerous
    new drug threat coming from Canada.” The drug? – so called “Extreme
    Ecstasy.”

    In a news release distributed in the U.S. and Canada, Walters warned
    that the use of ecstasy is being fueled by Canadian producers
    smuggling the illegal designer drug — which is increasingly laced
    with crystal meth — into the U.S.

    “Historic progress against ecstasy availability and use is in jeopardy
    of being rolled back by Canadian criminal organizations” Walters said
    in the release.

    Scott Burns, the primary spokesperson for Walters’ ONDCP office,
    echoed the alarming cry with “They are remarketing and packaging it
    and trying to glamorize it.”

    Certainly gives the guise of being important information for Americans
    – especially parents of teenagers, right? Unfortunately, it seems that
    John Walters and the ONDCP created “extreme ecstasy” out of their own
    imaginations.

    The U.S. Drug Czar has been caught lying – again. And this time, the
    direct rebuttal of his lies comes from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

    Less than two weeks after the January 4th ONDCP press release, the
    head of the RCMP’s national drug branch sternly rebuked the ONDCP claims.

    Supt. Paul Nadeau said he doesn’t know why Walters would make such
    fictional statements without checking facts with Canadian officials.
    He added that he himself has never heard of “extreme Ecstasy…. it
    would appear that it’s a term that somebody came up with in a
    boardroom in Washington, D.C.”

    Please write a letter to newspapers that carry coverage of the false
    claims.

    Let your local and state or provincial media know that the United
    States Drug Czar is a very unreliable and frankly dishonest source of
    accurate information.

    **********************************************************************

    Wire services sent versions of the RCMP rebuttals of the ONDCP claims
    to Canadian and United States media this past Monday, January 21st.
    The Canadian Press wire service version:

    VANCOUVER (CP) – The head of the RCMP’s national drug branch is
    debunking claims by the U.S. drug czar, who claims organized crime
    rings in Canada are dumping dangerous, methamphetamine-laced “extreme
    ecstasy” into his country.

    Supt. Paul Nadeau said he doesn’t know why John Walters, of the White
    House Office of National Drug Control Policy, would make such
    statements in a widely distributed news release without checking facts
    with Canadian officials.

    “I shook my head when I read the release that they put out,” said
    Nadeau, who’s never heard of extreme ecstasy.

    “That term is unknown to us, certainly in Canada, and I can tell you
    that I’ve spoken to law enforcement people in the U.S. and they’ve
    never heard of it either so it would appear that it’s a term that
    somebody came up with in a boardroom in Washington, D.C.”

    The release has generated huge media buzz in the U.S., with some news
    outlets using names such as “turbo-charged ecstasy,” which is
    supposedly flowing across the border from Canada.

    In the release, Walters warns public health and safety leaders that
    more than 55 per cent of ecstasy samples seized in the U.S. last year
    contained meth, a stimulant that affects the central nervous system.

    “This extreme ecstasy is a disturbing development in what has been one
    of the most significant international achievements against the illicit
    drug trade,” Walters said.

    “Cutting their product with less expensive methamphetamine boosts
    profits for Canadian ecstasy producers, likely increases the addictive
    potential of their product and effectively gives a dangerous
    ‘facelift’ to a designer drug that had fallen out of fashion with
    young American drug users.”

    Nadeau said there’s nothing new about ecstasy – the so-called love
    drug that gained popularity during the 1990s rave scene – being laced
    with methamphetamine or other stimulants and that it’s been happening
    for the last decade.

    **********************************************************************

    The following links find news clippings about ecstasy and the Drug Czar:

    http://www.mapinc.org/mdma.htm

    http://www.mapinc.org/walters.htm

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #359 Marc Emery Needs Your Support

    Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008
    Subject: #359 Marc Emery Needs Your Support

    MARC EMERY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #359 – Wednesday, 16 Jan 2008

    Newspapers across Canada and in the United States have been publishing
    items about Marc Emery, Vancouver’s self-styled Prince of Pot. While
    there is hope that a deal may be reached to allow Marc to serve five
    years jail time in Canada as opposed to perhaps a decades long term in
    United States, the deal is not final as of the date of this alert. He
    hopes that a deal will also save his two co-defendants, Michelle
    Rainey and Greg Williams, from prison time.

    Columnist Ian Mulgrew wrote in the Vancouver Sun:

    “He has run in federal, provincial and civic elections promoting his
    pro-cannabis platform. He has championed legal marijuana at
    parliamentary hearings, on national television, at celebrity
    conferences, in his own magazine, Cannabis Culture, and on his own
    Internet channel, Pot TV.

    “Health Canada even recommended medical marijuana patients buy their
    seeds from Emery. From 1998 until his arrest, Emery even paid
    provincial and federal taxes as a “marijuana seed vendor” totalling
    nearly $600,000.

    “He is being hounded because of his success. The political landscape
    has changed dramatically as a result of Emery’s politicking for
    cannabis. Emery challenged a law he disagrees with using exactly the
    non-violent, democratic processes we urge our children to embrace and
    of which we are so proud.”

    DEA administrator Karen Tandy in a press release on the day of
    Emery’s, July 29th, 2005, stated:

    “Today’s DEA arrest of Marc Scott Emery, publisher of Cannabis Culture
    magazine, and the founder of a marijuana legalization group, is a
    significant blow not only to the marijuana trafficking trade in the
    U.S. and Canada, but also to the marijuana legalization movement….
    Drug legalization lobbyists now have one less pot of money to rely
    on.”

    Tandy’s statement is accurate. Though there are hundreds of vendors
    selling marijuana seeds in Canada, Marc was unique in his superb
    financial support of marijuana legalization efforts on both sides of
    the border. Thus in the time of need of Marc and his co-defendants
    your letters of support to newspapers may help make a difference.

    MAP has already archived news coverage on this ruling from across
    North America. These, and additional clippings during the days ahead,
    may be found at:

    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Marc+Emery

    Your letters to newspapers that print anything about Marc will help
    send a signal about simple justice.

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for personal tips on how
    to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #358 Drug Cop Kills Woman, Wounds Baby

    Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008
    Subject: #358 Drug Cop Kills Woman, Wounds Baby

    DRUG COP KILLS WOMAN, WOUNDS BABY

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #358 – Tuesday, 8 Jan 2008

    The War on Drugs and a relentless policy of drug prohibition does not
    just increase violence in our communities among those involved with
    the illicit drug trade. It also increases undue violence and death
    among police and innocent bystanders. Over the past two decades,
    police forces across the USA have revamped their operations so that
    even routine search warrants are carried out by paramilitary SWAT teams.

    On Friday, Jan 4, the paramilitary SWAT unit of the Lima OH police
    department (city population 41,000) elected to serve a warrant at a
    home where they knew in advance that children were present. Still,
    they decided to go forward with the nighttime raid just after 8 p.m.
    Friday.

    The result was deadly.

    A SWAT team officer shot and killed Tarika Wilson. Her 1-year-old
    son, Sincere Wilson, also was shot.

    The man wanted in the arrest warrant was found immediately upon entry
    by the officers and arrested. An unidentified officer then ascended
    stairs to the second floor where he encountered Ms. Wilson holding her
    baby in her arms. He then shot and killed her, while wounding the
    infant.

    Such shooting by police of unarmed civilians nationwide continues to
    be reported far too often for the interest of general community health
    and safety. Further, the majority of such killings by police are
    waged against minority race civilians, despite the fact that all races
    use illicit drugs in virtually equal percentages.

    Perhaps the worst consequence of these police shootings of unarmed
    civilians is that it is very rare for the shooter cops to either be
    charged with a crime or even disciplined. Most police agencies seem
    to view such killing and injury to civilians as simple “collateral
    damage” in the never-ending War on Drugs.

    Please consider writing and sending a Letter to the Editor directed to
    the newspapers covering this story. Please use appropriate language
    to criticize the excessive force used by local police departments and
    encourage the newspapers to persist with coverage of the story in as
    much detail as possible.

    If you elect to write to more than one newspaper, we strongly suggest
    at least some modification of your message so that each newspaper
    receives a unique letter.

    Letters of 200 words or less have the best chance of print unless
    otherwise noted in MAP headers.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do.

    **********************************************************************

    MAP is archiving news and opinion coverage about this breaking news
    story which may be found at a link which updates every 24 hours:

    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Tarika+Wilson

    Radley Balko of Reason magazine is one of many notable national
    writers who has carefully detailed the rising use of paramilitary
    actions by U.S. police against civilians in the name of drug
    prohibition.

    His July 2006 report for The Cato Institute – “Overkill – The Rise of
    Paramilitary Police Raids In America” may be found here:

    http://drugsense.org/url/29ukwQCK

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for personal tips on how
    to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #357 2007 In Review

    Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007
    Subject: #357 2007 In Review

    2007 IN REVIEW

    *******************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE***********************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #357 – Monday, 31 December 2007

    2007 saw almost fifteen thousand new news clippings added to the
    www.mapinc.org archives.

    Over a half million different readers from about 125 countries
    accessed the clippings during the year. Based on a formula which
    recognizes that older clippings may have been accessed more than the
    more recent ones, selections of the 600 most read clippings by areas
    of the world are provided at the following links:

    http://mapinc.org/find?369 2007 in Review – Australasia

    http://mapinc.org/find?370 2007 in Review – Asia

    http://mapinc.org/find?366 2007 in Review – Canada

    http://mapinc.org/find?368 2007 in Review – South
    America

    http://mapinc.org/find?367 2007 in Review – United
    Kingdom

    http://mapinc.org/find?365 2007 in Review – United
    States

    The year 2007 was good for our Letter to The Editor writing activists,
    with about 2,230 letters printed that we know of as shown at
    http://mapinc.org/lte/

    The year also saw a nice upgrade in the online look of the DrugSense
    Weekly http://www.drugsense.org/current.htm

    Among the best kept secrets in the reform community is the 30,000 plus
    record Media Contact On Demand database, which received a facelift
    during 2007 for ease of use and for which the data is continuously
    crawled – computer programs are checking the web for changes – and
    updated http://www.mapinc.org/mcod/

    During the year DrugSense switched from using Paltalk to TeamSpeak for
    on line voice chats because the server software resides on our own
    server and because the program works as well on MAC and Linux
    computers as on Windows PCs. Besides MAP/DrugSense meeting rooms, both
    Law Enforcement Against Prohibition and the Ohio Patient Network have
    meeting rooms. Details about the software are at http://www.mapinc.org/resource/teamspeak/

    It has also been a busy year for the DrugSense webmastering/website
    hosting team supporting 125 reform websites and over 200 email lists
    and forums. Among the major projects of the year were these:

    – Major upgrades of The Drug Truth Network http://www.drugtruth.net
    and the LEAP websites http://www.leap.cc

    – Adding new websites http://thepotlawhasfallen.ca/,
    http://compassionatecanadians.com/, http://www.illinoisnorml.org/, and
    http://chemicalbigotry.org/, with others in the works.

    Oh, we have probably left out something we did during the past year
    that is important to you, but it is hard to keep on top of all that
    happens at DrugSense.

    On behalf of the MAP/DrugSense family of activists we wish you all the
    best for the New Year!

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP/DrugSense Family of Activists

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #356 Crack Vs Powder Disparity

    Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007
    Subject: #356 Crack Vs Powder Disparity

    CRACK VS POWDER DISPARITY

    *********************PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE*************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #356 – Saturday, 29 December 2007

    The past month realized a long overdue alteration in federal
    sentencing guidelines pertaining to drug law offenders convicted of
    possession and/or distribution of cocaine.

    For two long decades, federal laws have mandated that those offenders
    found with crack cocaine – should be sentenced to much more draconian
    prison time than those who were convicted of involvement with the more
    commonly used powder form of cocaine. Most notably, sentencing
    guidelines were founded on the basis of product weight. Crack-related
    sentences on par to powder sentences were triggered by weights as
    small as a 1/100 ratio.

    Most defense lawyers and civil rights advocates say the lopsided
    perception of crack versus cocaine is rooted in racism. Four out of
    every five crack defendants are black, while most powdered-cocaine
    defendants are white.

    MAP has been archiving news and opinion coverage on this important
    story line over the past few weeks. Additionally, fresh coverage is
    seeing print across the U.S. this week.

    Please consider writing and sending a Letter to the Editor directed to
    the newspapers closest to your hometown which have printed coverage of
    this story line and to the major newspapers as the articles and
    opinions are printed.

    Target news clippings may be found at this MAP Bookmark:

    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Sentencing+Commission

    If you elect to write to more than one newspaper, we strongly suggest
    at least some modification of your message so that each newspaper
    receives a unique letter. Letters of 200 words or less have the best
    chance of print unless otherwise noted in MAP headers.

    As a number of the clippings suggest, the disparity will not be
    totally removed until congress acts. Please inform your members of
    congress about your views.

    Thanks for your effort and support.

    It’s not what others do it’s what YOU do

    **********************************************************************

    Additional suggestions for writing LTEs are at our Media Activism Center:

    http://www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides

    Or contact MAP’s Media Activism Facilitator for personal tips on how
    to write LTEs that get printed.

    [email protected]

    **********************************************************************

    PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER

    Please post a copy of your letter or report your action to the sent
    letter list ( [email protected] ) if you are subscribed, or by
    E-mailing a copy directly to [email protected] if you are not
    subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list so others
    can learn from your efforts.

    Subscribing to the Sent LTE list ( [email protected] ) will help you
    to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or
    approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing
    efforts.

    To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see

    http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The MAP Media Activism Team www.mapinc.org/resource

    =.

  • Focus Alerts

    #355 Volunteers Needed

    Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007
    Subject: Volunteers Needed

    WHAT: Editor Cyber Training Session

    WHO: Media Awareness Project, Inc (www.MAPinc.org)

    WHERE: From the Comfort of Your Keyboard

    WHEN: NOW! As soon as a few volunteers are ready.

    WHY: Reform Drug Policy!

    Our Drug News Archive grows by 30 to 70 articles per day using a
    well-tuned, semi-automated process. Our Editors are the dedicated
    people who process the hundreds of articles that are sent to us.

    We are currently organizing a training session by collecting a list of
    volunteers interested in becoming a part of our team. Our web-based,
    self-paced training course makes it easy to learn the few steps it
    takes to receive and process articles.

    Please contact Jo-D Harrison, [email protected] , if you would like
    additional information.

    **********************************************************************

    The emailed version of this request contains an additional appeal that
    is automatic and may be disregarded.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: The editors at MAP team.

    =.