• Drug Policy - Question of the Week

    What are adverse drug events?

    Drug Policy Question of the Week – 6-5-11

    As answered by Mary Jane Borden, Editor of Drug War Facts for the Drug Truth Network on 6-5-11. http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/3413

    Question of the Week: What are adverse drug events?

    An article in the Connecticut Law Review defines the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the agency that

    “regulates both the safety and effectiveness of prescription pharmaceuticals and certain medical devices. In addition to ensuring that prescription drugs are safe and effective before they are sold in interstate commerce, the FDA approves all information a manufacturer plans to provide physicians on a drug’s recommended use, contraindications, risks, and side-effects.”

    The FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is the regulatory body that oversees over-the-counter and prescription drugs, and biological therapeutics. This agency has produced several trendable reports, including a data briefing covering 1996 to 2006.

    This paper overviews the CDER’s Adverse Event Reporting System that compiles

    “voluntary adverse drug reaction reports from [healthcare practitioners] and required reports from manufacturers … this system forms “the basis of “signals” that there may be a potential for serious and unrecognized drug-associated events [or reactions].”

    Drug reaction numbers from this FDA system are now displayed in two Drug War Facts Tables, one called “Prescription Drug Product Approvals, Recalls and Adverse Event Reports” and the other named “AERS Patient Outcomes by Year,” both sourced directly from the FDA.

    Both of these tables reflect troubling statistics. The former table shows that Adverse Drug Event reports to the FDA concerning prescription drugs soared by almost +75% for the six years (2002-2007) compared to the prior six years (1996-2001). Further, and perhaps more disturbing, adverse reaction outcome “deaths” totaling over 370,000 and “serious outcomes” eclipsing 2,300,000 occurred during the ten years from 2000 to 2009 for the prescription drugs tracked by this FDA system.

    These facts and others like them can be found in the Regulation of Prescription Drugs section of the United States chapter of Drug War Facts at www.drugwarfacts.org.

  • Hot Off The 'Net

    Harm Reduction or Mixed Messages?

    By J.T. Junig, MD, PhD

    I’m curious what readers think about needle exchange programs, dosing rooms, and other means of harm reduction. Should we provide clean syringes and needles for drug addicts at taxpayer expense? Should the needles incorporate filters to protect people who dissolve and inject Suboxone—at the same time when many patients wait in line to get into a buprenorphine program in order to use the medication properly?

    I would also appreciate comments from anyone who is making use of needle exchange or similar programs—and from any readers who are diverting Suboxone. Set up a free, anonymous e-mail account and let me know why you are doing what you are doing—instead of using the medication properly and leaving the using days behind. If you are nervous about leaving an I.P. address on the Psych Central site, send me an e-mail—to [email protected] .

  • Drug Policy - Question of the Week

    What are clinical trials?

    Drug Policy Question of the Week – 5-28-11

    As answered by Mary Jane Borden, Editor of Drug War Facts for the Drug Truth Network on 5-28-11. http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/3403

    Question of the Week: What are Clinical Trials?

    Wikipedia defines clinical trials as,

    “a set of procedures in medical research conducted to allow safety and efficacy data to be collected for health interventions such as drugs, diagnostics, devices, and therapy protocols.”

    Clinical trials in the United States begin with the Food and Drug Administration or FDA that

    “regulates both the safety and effectiveness of prescription pharmaceuticals and certain medical devices.”

    The National Bureau of Economic Research overviews this process that,

    “begins when a firm files an Investigational New Drug [IND] application, which requests permission from the FDA to conduct clinical trials on humans … Once the FDA gives its approval, the firm may begin conducting clinical trials for the drug, which proceed in three phases.”

    “The goal of Phase I is to evaluate the drug’s safety and to obtain data on its pharmacologic properties. Typically, phase I trials enroll small numbers of healthy volunteers. Phase II trials then enroll slightly larger numbers of sick volunteers. The goal of these trials is to begin investigating a drug’s efficacy and optimal dosage, and to monitor the drug’s safety in diseased patents. Finally, Phase III testing typically involves larger numbers of sick patients and is the most costly stage of the approval process. Phase III testing seeks to establish more definitively the efficacy of a drug, as well as to discover any rare side effects. Upon the completion of Phase III testing, the firm submits a New Drug Application to the FDA, which is accompanied by the results of the clinical trials. The FDA may then reject the application, require further clinical testing, or approve the drug outright.”

    These facts and others like them can be found Regulation of Prescription Drugs section of the United States Chapter of Drug War Facts at www.drugwarfacts.org.

     

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    GRIEVING PARENTS: LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS

    Re: Heroin That Goes Far Beyond Junk, Joe O’Connor, May 13.

    As grieving parents of a son who died at age 19 in 1993 after
    ingesting some street heroin, may we offer our comments? When America
    prohibited alcohol, thousands were poisoned by adulterated market
    booze. When alcohol was legalized again, those incidents were
    drastically reduced.

    Today, our children are dying because of adulterated black market
    drugs. The carnage will end only when we come to our senses and allow
    users once again to purchase clean, cheap, quality-tested drugs at
    the corner store just as tobacco users now do.

    Let’s finish the job we started when we ended alcohol prohibition,
    follow the principles enshrined in the Charter and legalize all drugs.

    Eleanor and Alan Randell, Victoria.

    Pubdate: Tue, 17 May 2011

    Source: National Post (Canada)

    Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n304/a02.html

  • What You Can Do

    Petition to End the War on Drugs

    We call on you to end the war on drugs and the prohibition regime, and move towards a system based on decriminalisation, regulation, public health and education. This 50 year old policy has failed, fuels violent organised crime, devastates lives and is costing billions. It is time for a humane and effective approach.

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    HOW TO FIGHT DRUG CARTELS

    Two days ago, during a political discussion about border problems
    toward the end of a Sierra Club outing to look for Taylor’s
    checkerspot butterflies at the Beazell Memorial Forest in Oregon, I
    mentioned that the Mexican drug cartels have won. There is
    insufficient political and financial will to launch an effective
    fight against those gangs.

    I first heard this opinion from Charles Bowden in his book titled
    “Dreamland: The Way Out of Juarez.” Bowden wrote that the society in
    that city has gone through a metamorphosis and is now governed by drug cartels.

    Today’s Arizona Daily Star online has an article titled: “Mexican
    drug gangs assuming government roles.” If you want to read it, click
    this link:
    http://azstarnet.com/news/local/border/article_6f4c5a30-e69b-5626-8471-9b20caa59c25.html

    The solution: legalize drugs and tax them, just like cigarettes and alcohol.

    When the prohibition of alcohol was repealed, organized crime lost a
    major source of income and the number of violent crimes plummeted. It
    is obvious that present U.S. drug prohibition is not working.
    Continuing ineffective action is costly and does not solve the
    problem. It actually creates problems of overcrowded jails and
    courts. The drug cartels’ domination spills over into the U.S.’s
    southwestern communities and includes law enforcement corruption.

    Living in the Southwest became much more risky during the past
    decade. Oregon is way less dangerous than Arizona, only due to the
    distance from Mexico.

    Ricardo Small, Albany

    Pubdate: Tue, 10 May 2011

    Source: Albany Democrat-Herald (OR)