• Drug Policy - Hot Off The 'Net

    By Huge Margins, Voters Want Drug Penalties Reduced

    A whopping 72% of California voters support reducing the penalty for possession of a small amount of illegal drugs for personal use from a felony to a misdemeanor

    A brand new poll this week finds that a whopping 72% of California voters support reducing the penalty for possession of a small amount of illegal drugs for personal use from a felony to a misdemeanor, including a solid majority who support this reform strongly. The March 21-24 survey of 800 California general election voters was conducted by Lake Research Partners and commissioned by the Drug Policy Alliance, the ACLU of Northern California and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. Poll results and analysis are available online.

  • Cannabis & Hemp - Drug Policy - Hot Off The 'Net

    Pot Laws Ruled Unconstitutional

    An Ontario Superior Court judge has ruled that the federal medical marijuana program is unconstitutional, giving the government three months to fix the problem before pot is effectively legalized.

    In an April 11 ruling, Justice Donald Taliano found that doctors across the country have “massively boycotted” the medical marijuana program and largely refuse to sign off on forms giving sick people access to necessary medication.

    As a result, legitimately sick people cannot access medical marijuana through appropriate means and must resort to illegal actions.

    Doctors’ “overwhelming refusal to participate in the medicinal marijuana program completely undermines the effectiveness of the program,” the judge wrote in his ruling.

    “The effect of this blind delegation is that seriously ill people who need marijuana to treat their symptoms are branded criminals simply because they are unable to overcome the barriers to legal access put in place by the legislative scheme.”

    Taliano declared the program to be invalid, as well as the criminal laws prohibiting possession and production of cannabis. He suspended his ruling for three months, giving Ottawa until mid-July to fix the program or face the prospect of effectively legalizing possession and production of cannabis.

    Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n241/a08.html

    Pubdate: Wed, 13 Apr 2011
    Source: Toronto Star (CN ON)
    Copyright: 2011 The Toronto Star
    Contact: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.thestar.com/
    Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/456
    Author: Jennifer Yang
    Referenced: The Decision http://mapinc.org/url/Q7Itqn7O
    Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis – Canada)

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    LEGALIZE MARIJUANA AND BE DONE WITH IT

    So the new legislation “that would allow those caught with small
    amounts of marijuana to avoid punishment altogether if they can
    convince a judge that they used the drug out of medical necessity” is
    supposed to be a “middle ground on marijuana?” Get real. This is yet
    another excuse to put off what should have been done long ago:
    legalization, not just for medicinal use, but for all citizens.

    The fact of the matter is that marijuana is safer than alcohol or
    tobacco, yet its use can cause one to lose their job, be expelled from
    schools and universities, and even land in jail. We spend an enormous
    amount of money to enforce marijuana laws, as evidenced by the 759,593
    arrests for possession alone in 2009. That translates to huge sums of
    money spent on unnecessary law enforcement and a prison population
    filled with people who are hardly criminals (and are forced to survive
    in a system that only creates more criminals). Regulation would also
    bring in a new source of tax revenue, as well as taking a huge cash
    crop away from drug cartels that terrorize Mexico and other parts of
    the world.

    So please, don’t insult our intelligence by telling us that the
    proposed legislation is a “middle ground.” We shouldn’t even have to
    establish a middle ground. The support for legalization is based in
    fact, while its opponents have long used fear and lies at a great cost
    to our society.

    Joel Beller, Owings Mills

    Pubdate: Wed, 30 Mar 2011

    Source: Baltimore Sun (MD)

  • Drug Policy - Question of the Week

    What is domestic surveillance?

    Drug Policy Question of the Week – 4-4-11

    As answered by Mary Jane Borden, Editor of Drug War Facts for the Drug Truth Network on 4-4-11. http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/3331

    Question of the Week What is domestic surveillance?

    In a 2003 report, the American Civil Liberties Union warned,

    “In recent years – in no small part as the result of the failed “war on drugs” – Fourth Amendment principles have been steadily eroding. … The courts have allowed for increased surveillance and searches ….”

    The Department of Defense defines “Electronic Surveillance” as,

    “Acquisition of a nonpublic communication by electronic means without the consent of a person who is a party to an electronic communication.”

    It calls “Domestic Activities” those

    “that take place within the United States that do not involve a significant connection with a foreign power, organization, or person.”

    and indicates, that

    “Information may be collected about a United States person who is reasonably believed to be engaged in international narcotics activities.”

    Illicit drugs are often smuggled from other countries.

    The American Constitution Society worries that

    “There has been a massive shift from surveillance and intelligence-gathering based on a factual predicate—such as specific information or a lead about a suspicious person or event—to surveillance and intelligence-gathering intended to obtain vast troves of data on millions of people.”

    The American Civil Liberties Union confirms that

    “Data companies collect information from courthouses and other public sources, as well as marketing data – sometimes including extremely personal information [concerning Americans]…”.

    Citing Senator Sam Ervin the chief author of the 1974 Privacy Act,

    “When the Government knows all of our secrets, we stand naked before official power. Stripped of our privacy, we lose our rights and privileges. The Bill of Rights then becomes just so many words.”

    These facts and others like them can be found in the Domestic Surveillance section of the Interdiction of Drugs and Military Participation Chapters of Drug War Facts at www.drugwarfacts.org.

  • Drug Policy - Question of the Week

    What is naloxone?

    Drug Policy Question of the Week – 3-26-11

    As answered by Mary Jane Borden, Editor of Drug War Facts for the Drug Truth Network on 3-26-11. http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/3320

    Question of the Week: What is naloxone?

    A Drug Profile for Naloxone HCl from the Arizona Department of Health Services describes the drug as a

    “narcotic (opioid) agonist” marketed under the name Narcan. Its adult dosages come in IV, intra-nasal, and continuous IV infusion forms. As an antidote to opioid overdose, Naloxone “Reverses respiratory depression secondary to narcotics.”

    According to a Drexel University Law Review article,

    “The drug “blocks the effects of opiates by binding to three types of opioid receptors in the central nervous system. It is standard practice for first responders to inject naloxone when summoned to the scene of drug overdose”

    A study in the Canadian Journal for Emergency Medicine, stated,

    “Respiratory depression, the primary cause of death in opioid overdose, is due to direct inhibition of the brainstem respiratory centre and decreased responsiveness to carbon dioxide.”

    “Heroin [an opioid] is particularly toxic because of high lipid solubility, which allows it to cross the blood–brain barrier within seconds and achieve high brain levels.

    “Naloxone is also lipid soluble and enters the brain rapidly. Reversal of respiratory depression is evident 3–4 minutes after IV and 5–6 minutes after subcutaneous administration.”

    According to a 2005 article in the Journal of Urban Health,

    “Naloxone precipitates acute withdrawal symptoms in opiate-dependent persons, but has no effect on nonopiate users; serious adverse effects are rare and naloxone has no abuse potential.”

    The report goes on to say,

    “Fatal heroin overdose has become a leading cause of death among injection drug users. Several recent feasibility studies have concluded that naloxone distribution programs for heroin injectors should be implemented to decrease heroin overdose deaths.”

    These facts and others like them can be found in the Naloxone section of the Methadone Maintenance & Buprenorphine Chapters of Drug War Facts at www.drugwarfacts.org.

  • Focus Alerts

    ALERT: #467 Michigan Marihuana Act Under Attack

    MICHIGAN MARIHUANA ACT UNDER ATTACK

    **********************************************************************

    DrugSense FOCUS Alert #467 – Sunday, April 3rd, 2011

    More than 1.3 million adults read the Sunday Detroit Free Press so
    what it prints is influential.

    Today two items focused on medicinal marijuana.

    The first, an in depth editorial, is at
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n218/a09.html

    The second, a detailed article, is at
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11.n219.a01.html

    Please consider writing LTEs to the Michigan newspapers shown here
    http://www.drugsense.org/cms/geoview/n-us-mi

    To follow press clippings about Michigan cannabis use this link
    http://www.mapinc.org/find?275

    And please send this Alert to others who may be interested. You may
    also send it as a link to this Alert from the DrugSense Blog
    http://drugsense.org/blog/category/wycd/alerts

    It Is Not What Others Do, It Is What You Do.

    **********************************************************************

    Prepared by: Richard Lake, Focus Alert Specialist www.mapinc.org

    ===
    .
    DrugSense provides many services at no charge, but they are not
    free to produce. Your contributions make DrugSense and its Media
    Awareness Project (MAP) happen. Please donate today. Our secure Web
    server at http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm accepts credit cards
    and Paypal. Or, mail your check or money order to:
    .
    DrugSense
    14252 Culver Drive #328
    Irvine, CA 92604-0326.
    (800) 266 5759
    .
    DrugSense is a 501c(3) non-profit organization dedicated to raising
    awareness about the expensive, ineffective, and destructive “War on
    Drugs.” Donations are tax deductible to the extent provided by law.

  • Letter of the Week

    Letter Of The Week

    DESPITE MARIJUANA, BRECKENRIDGE IS PLENTY SAFE

    Re. “Potheads ruining Breckenridge” by Lorie Willis, letters, March 21
    I would like to thank Lorie Willis of San Antonio, Texas for her
    pleasant description of Breckenridge. It is beautiful, and we do love
    it here. I am concerned about a few points in her letter and would
    like to share my opinion and some statistics with everyone.

    Firstly it was said that Breckenridge is now unsafe due to marijuana
    legalization. I went to www.neighborhoodscout.com to check the
    statistics. Breckenridge scored a 74 out of 100 for safety with only
    .64 violent crimes per year per 1,000 residents; where as a place like
    San Antonio, Texas scored a 4 out of 100 for safety with 6.87 violent
    crimes per 1,000 residents annually. Clearly Breckenridge is safer
    than not only San Antonio but 74 percent of all cities nationwide!

    Breckenridge residents voted over 70 percent in favor of legalizing
    marijuana, up from over 60 percent in 2006 when asked at the state
    level. Breckenridge residents have been consuming cannabis in high
    numbers since the late 70s, and its their charm and stewardship of
    this great land that attracted people like myself and Lorie to visit
    and live. I would argue we shouldn’t let a misconception about our
    cannabis use lead any of us away from the town of Breckenridge.

    Support for legalization grows daily not only in Breck and Summit
    County but in the nation and the world. As cannabis consumption rises
    and alcohol abuse drops Breckenridge will only become safer and more
    family friendly. As always stay classy, Breckenridge

    Brian Rogers

    Pubdate: Wed, 23 Mar 2011

    Source: Summit Daily News (CO)

    Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n000/a014.html

  • What You Can Do

    Help Return Marc Emery to Canada

    As many of you know, Marc Emery has been jailed in the United States for the last year serving out a five year sentence for distributing millions of cannabis seeds in an effort to raise money to support cannabis law reform.

    For the last several months he has been in Folkstown, GA, at the D Ray James correctional facility. His jail blogs are at http://www.cannabisculture.com/ and further information is available at http://www.freemarc.ca/.

    Marc is now being transferred to another facility, currently unknown. He continues to await a decision from the United States on his request to transfer back to Canada to serve out his sentence at home.

    We are seeking support for his request to serve his sentence in Canada. He meets all the relevant treaty criteria and suggests that US taxpayers need not be burdened with the cost of his incarceration, particularly when he never physically entered the US while engaging in the admittedly criminal conduct.

    If you are able to assist with building support from US officials, either at the state or federal level, please either contact me ([email protected]) or his wife Jodie ([email protected]). Information on how to contact the DOJ representative with conduct of his file is at the www.freemarc.ca website. Please note
    that a decision could come at any time, so we are racing the clock in some sense.

    Thank you in advance for your consideration.

    Kirk Tousaw,
    Barrister